Search

To estimate future climate change impacts, usually high-resolution climate projections are necessary. Statistical and dynamical downscaling or a hybrid of both methods are mostly used to produce input datasets for impact modelers. In this study, we use the regional climate model (RCM) COSMO-CLM (CCLM) version 6.0 to identify the added value of dynamically downscaling a general circulation model (GCM) from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project (CMIP6) and its climate change projections' signal over Central Asia (CA). We use the MPI-ESM1-2-HR (at 1° spatial resolution) to drive the CCLM (at 0.22° horizontal resolution) for the historical period of 1985–2014 and the projection period of 2019–2100 under three different shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs): SSP1-2.6, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Using the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS) gridded observation dataset, we evaluate the CCLM performance over the historical period using a simulation driven by ERAInterim reanalysis. CCLM's added value, compared to its driving GCM, is significant over CA mountainous areas, which are at higher risk of extreme precipitation events. Furthermore, we downscale the CCLM for future climate projections. We present high-resolution maps of heavy precipitation changes based on CCLM and compare them with CMIP6 GCMs ensemble. Our analysis shows a significant increase in heavy precipitation intensity and frequency over CA areas that are already at risk of extreme climatic events in the present day. Finally, applying our single model high-resolution dynamical downscaling, we train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to map the low-resolution GCM simulations to the dynamically downscaled CCLM ones. We show that applied CNN could emulate the GCM-CCLM model chain over large CA areas. However, this specific emulator has shortcomings when applied to a new GCM-CCLM model chain. Our downscaling data and the pre-trained CNN model could be used by scientific communities interested in downscaling CMIP6 models and searching for a trade-off between the dynamical and statistical methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Paris, France, December 2015, the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) invited the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide a "special report in 2018 on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways". In Nairobi, Kenya, April 2016, the IPCC panel accepted the invitation. Here we describe the response devised within the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP) to provide tailored, cross-sectorally consistent impacts projections. The simulation protocol is designed to allow for (1) separation of the impacts of historical warming starting from pre-industrial conditions from other human drivers such as historical land-use changes (based on pre-industrial and historical impact model simulations); (2) quantification of the effects of additional warming up to 1.5 °C, including a potential overshoot and long-term effects up to 2299, compared to a no-mitigation scenario (based on the low-emissions Representative Concentration Pathway RCP2.6 and a no-mitigation pathway RCP6.0) with socio-economic conditions fixed at 2005 levels; and (3) assessment of the climate effects based on the same climate scenarios but accounting for simultaneous changes in socio-economic conditions following the middle-of-the-road Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP2, Fricko et al., 2016) and differential bio-energy requirements associated with the transformation of the energy system to comply with RCP2.6 compared to RCP6.0. With the aim of providing the scientific basis for an aggregation of impacts across sectors and analysis of cross-sectoral interactions that may dampen or amplify sectoral impacts, the protocol is designed to facilitate consistent impacts projections from a range of impact models across different sectors (global and regional hydrology, global crops, global vegetation, regional forests, global and regional marine ecosystems and fisheries, global and regional coastal infrastructure, energy supply and demand, health, and tropical cyclones). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Climate simulations are the fuel to drive hydrological models that are used to assess the impacts of climate change and variability on hydrological parameters, such as river discharges, soil moisture, and evapotranspiration. Unlike with cars, where we know which fuel the engine requires, we never know in advance what unexpected side-effects might be caused by the fuel we feed our models with. Sometimes we increase the fuel's octane number (bias-correction) to achieve better performance and find out that the model behaves differently but not always as was expected or desired. This study investigates the impacts of projected climate change on the hydrology of the Upper Blue Nile catchment using two model ensembles consisting of five global CMIP5 Earth System Models and ten Regional Climate Models (CORDEX Africa). WATCH forcing data were used to calibrate an eco-hydrological model and to bias-correct both model ensembles using slightly differing approaches. On the one hand it was found that the bias-correction methods considerably improved the performance of average rainfall characteristics in the reference period (1970-1999) in most of the cases. This also holds true for non-extreme discharge conditions between Q20 and Q80. On the other hand, bias-corrected simulations tend to overemphasise magnitudes of projected change signals and extremes. A general weakness of both uncorrected and bias-corrected simulations is the rather poor representation of high and low flows and their extremes, which were often deteriorated by bias-correction. This inaccuracy is a crucial deficiency for regional impact studies dealing with water management issues and it is therefore important to analyse model performance and characteristics, the effect of bias-correction, and eventually to exclude some climate models from the ensemble. However, the multi-model means of all ensembles project increasing average annual discharges in the Upper Blue Nile catchment and a shift in seasonal patterns, with decreasing discharges in June and July and increasing discharges from August to November. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In our first study on possible flood damages under climate change in Germany, we reported that a considerable increase in flood-related losses can be expected in a future warmer climate. However, the general significance of the study was limited by the fact that outcome of only one global climate model (GCM) was used as a large-scale climate driver, while many studies report that GCMs are often the largest source of uncertainty in impact modelling. Here we show that a much broader set of global and regional climate model combinations as climate drivers show trends which are in line with the original results and even give a stronger increase of damages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major river and flash floods and other hydro-meteorological extremes have accumulated worldwide over the last decade reminding the public as well as the private sector that climate related risks are likely to become even more damaging and prevalent as climate patterns change. However, information about current and future hydro-climatic extremes is often not available, and the complexity of the task and the associated uncertainty, considering different climate scenarios and models, aggravates the adaptation of any natural hazards related risk management. While not all low probability weather and flood events will lead to high impacts, others may accumulate by the interaction of several hydro-meteorological events. This will lead to a change of the level of risk, for example, to critical infrastructure.The methodology and model suite presented here was developed to estimate different perils such as heavy precipitation, heat waves, floods, and droughts under recent and future climate conditions. The focus is on extreme events, related damages and possible adaptation measures. The weather and climate module uses observed and regional climate model data to produce, using a probabilistic approach, long-term daily weather time series as they are representative under current and future climate conditions. They serve as input to the hydrological module, which translates the weather input under current and future conditions into runoff components, which are routed over the river network using a hydraulic model to assess the changes in future flood volumes and levels. A risk module translates the hydrological extremes into financial losses and a web-based Geographic Information System visualizes the simulation results.Using the example of the Danube basin, we quantify and discuss the different climate-related sources of uncertainty when projecting flood hazard and risk, and we show that robust trends and projections can be found. We also demonstrate how these results can be applied in adaptation strategies in the public and private sectors, for example when looking at critical infrastructure [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]