Search

Accurately estimating the surface melt volume of the Antarctic Ice Sheet is challenging and has hitherto relied on climate modeling or observations from satellite remote sensing. Each of these methods has its limitations, especially in regions with high surface melt. This study aims to demonstrate the potential of improving surface melt simulations with a regional climate model by deploying a deep learning model. A deep-learning-based framework has been developed to correct surface melt from the regional atmospheric climate model version 2.3p2 (RACMO2), using meteorological observations from automatic weather stations (AWSs) and surface albedo from satellite imagery. The framework includes three steps: (1) training a deep multilayer perceptron (MLP) model using AWS observations, (2) correcting Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) albedo observations, and (3) using these two to correct the RACMO2 surface melt simulations. Using observations from three AWSs at the Larsen B and C ice shelves, Antarctica, cross-validation shows a high accuracy (root-mean-square error of 0.95 mm w.e. d -1 , mean absolute error of 0.42 mm w.e. d -1 , and a coefficient of determination of 0.95). Moreover, the deep MLP model outperforms conventional machine learning models and a shallow MLP model. When applying the trained deep MLP model over the entire Larsen Ice Shelf, the resulting corrected RACMO2 surface melt shows a better correlation with the AWS observations for two out of three AWSs. However, for one location (AWS 18), the deep MLP model does not show improved agreement with AWS observations; this is likely because surface melt is largely driven by factors (e.g., air temperature, topography, katabatic wind) other than albedo within the corresponding coarse-resolution model pixels. Our study demonstrates the opportunity to improve surface melt simulations using deep learning combined with satellite albedo observations. However, more work is required to refine the method, especially for complicated and heterogeneous terrains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of clouds on the surface mass balance of ice sheets remains a point of debate as there is no scientific consensus on the role of the cloud radiative effect (CRE) on the two major ice sheets. For the Greenland Ice Sheet, for example, conflicting studies argue either that clouds reduce surface melt through their radiative effect by blocking short-wave radiation (cloud cooling) or enhance surface melt by reducing meltwater refreezing (cloud warming). For the Antarctic Ice Sheet, on the other hand, the impact of the CRE effects on the ice sheet remain poorly quantified, although it can play a major role on the melt processes on ice shelves.To assess the impact of the CRE on surface snow and firn conditions on both ice sheets, simulations have been performed with SNOWPACK, a physically-based snow model forced with and without cloud radiative forcing. For this purpose, a state-of-the-art hybrid dataset has been created to represent the cloud forcing on the surface mass balance. This hybrid data set is a combination of CloudSat-CALIPSO satellite observations and data from the regional climate model, RACMO2.3. The combination of both data sets results in an observation-based forcing dataset with higher temporal resolution than the satellite observations can provide. Simulations are performed such that the response of the firn can be separated in a short-term and long-term component.Results show that the seasonal variation of the CRE is positive throughout the year, which implies a net cloud warming. Additionally, the simulations highlight that cloud cooling and cloud warming occur on different time scales: the first being a more direct, short-term effect and the latter having a long-term effect by initiating a feedback response that changes firn conditions. The long-term response of the firn to the CRE is shown to be dominant in summer, enhancing meltwater production and runoff by initializing a melt-albedo feedback.The long-term CRE impact on firn conditions during the melt season highlights the importance of the (initial) firn conditions when performing cloud radiation studies. It calls for the need of either detailed information of the firn surface layers or the inclusion of a snow-model that can accurately model firn response in such studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]