Search

A terrestrial reference frame (TRF) is a basis for precise orbit determination of Earth-orbiting satellites, since it defines positions and velocities of stations, the tracking data of which are used to derive satellite positions. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame realization ITRF2014, as compared to its predecessor ITRF2008, on the quality of orbits, namely, on root-mean-square (rms) fits of observations and orbital arc overlaps of three altimetry satellites (TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1 , and Jason-2) in the time interval from August 1992 to April 2015 and on altimetry products computed using these orbits, such as single-satellite altimeter crossover differences, radial and geographically correlated mean sea surface height (SSH) errors and regional and global mean sea level trends. The satellite orbits are computed using satellite laser ranging (SLR) and Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) observations of a global network of stations. We have found that using ITRF2014 generally improves the orbit quality as compared to using ITRF2008. Thus, the mean values of the rms fits of SLR observations decreased (improved) by 2.4 % and 8.8 % for Jason-1 and Jason-2 , respectively, but are almost not impacted for TOPEX/Poseidon when using ITRF2014 instead of ITRF2008. The internal orbit consistency in the radial direction (as derived from arc overlaps) is reduced (improved) by 6.6 %, 2.3 %, and 5.9 % for TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1 , and Jason-2 , respectively. Single-satellite altimetry crossover analyses indicate reduction (improvement) in the absolute mean crossover differences by 0.2 mm (8.1 %) for TOPEX, 0.4 mm (17.7 %) for Jason-1 , and 0.6 mm (30.9 %) for Jason-2 with ITRF2014 instead of ITRF2008. The major improvement of the mean values of the rms of crossover differences (0.13 mm; 0.3 %) has been found for Jason-2. Multi-mission crossover analysis shows slight improvements in the standard deviations of radial errors: 0.1 %, 0.2 %, and 1.6 % for TOPEX, Jason-1 , and Jason-2 , respectively. The standard deviations of geographically correlated mean SSH errors improved by 1.1 % for Jason-1 and 5.4 % for Jason-2 and degraded by 1.3 % for TOPEX. The change from ITRF2008 to ITRF2014 orbits only has minor effects on the estimation of regional and global sea level trends over the 22-year time series from 1993 to 2015. However, on interannual timescales (3–8 years) large-scale coherent trend patterns are observed that seem to be connected to drifts between the origins of the tracking station networks. This leads to the changes in interannual global mean sea level of up to 0.06 mm yr -1 for TOPEX, 0.05 mm yr -1 for Jason-1 , and up to 0.12 mm yr -1 for Jason-2 , i.e., up to 4 % of the corresponding sea level signal based on altimetry for timescales of 3 to 8 years. The respective changes in the regional sea level trend on these timescales are up to 0.4 mm yr -1 in the time span from April 1993 to July 2008 and up to 1.0 mm yr -1 in the time span from July 2008 to April 2015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A terrestrial reference frame (TRF) is a basis for precise orbit determination of Earth orbiting satellites, since it defines positions and velocities of stations tracking data of which is used to derive satellite positions. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame realization ITRF2014, as compared to its predecessor ITRF2008, on the quality of orbits, namely, on root-mean-square (RMS) fits of observations and orbital arc overlaps of three altimetry satellites (TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1 and Jason-2) at the time interval from August 1992 till April 2015 and on altimetry products computed using these orbits, such as single-satellite altimeter crossover differences, radial and geographically correlated mean sea surface height (SSH) errors, regional and global mean sea level trends. The satellite orbits are computed using Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) and Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) observations of a global network of stations. We have found that using ITRF2014 generally improves orbit quality, as compared to using ITRF2008. Thus, the mean values of the RMS fits of SLR observations decreased (improved) by 2.4 and 8.8% for Jason-1 and Jason-2, respectively, but are almost not impacted for TOPEX/Poseidon, when using ITRF2014 instead of ITRF2008. The internal orbit consistency in the radial direction (as derived from arc overlaps) is reduced (improved) by 6.6%, 2.3%, and 5.9% for TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, and Jason-2, respectively. Single satellite altimetry crossover analysis indicates reduction (improvement) of the absolute mean crossover differences by 0.2mm (8.1%) for TOPEX/Poseidon, 0.4mm (17.7%) for Jason-1 and 0.6mm (30.9%) for Jason-2 with ITRF2014 instead of ITRF2008. The major improvement of the mean values of the RMS of crossover differences (0.13mm (0.3%)) has been found for Jason-2. Multi-mission crossover analysis shows slight improvements in the standard deviations of radial errors: 0.1%, 0.2% and 1.6% for TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1 and Jason-2, respectively. The standard deviations of geographically correlated mean SSH errors improved by 1.1% for Jason-1 and 5.4% for Jason-2 and degraded by 1.3% for TOPEX/Poseidon. The change from ITRF2008 to ITRF2014 orbits has only minor effects on the estimation of regional and global sea level trends over the 22 years time series from 1993 to 2015. However, on interannual time scales (3-8 years) large scale coherent trend patterns are observed that seem to be connected to drifts between the origins of the tracking stations networks. This leads to uncertainties of interannual global mean sea level of up to 0.06mmyr-1 for TOPEX/Poseidon, 0.05mmyr-1 for Jason-1, and up to 0.12mmyr-1 for Jason-2. The respective changes of regional sea level trend on these time scales reach maximum values of 0.4mmyr-1 for TOPEX/Poseidon, of 0.5mmyr-1 for Jason-1 and of 1.0mmyr-1 for Jason-2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we present an empirical model, named CH-Therm-2018, of the thermospheric mass density derived from 9-year (from August 2000 to July 2009) accelerometer measurements from the CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) satellite at altitudes from 460 to 310 km. The CHAMP dataset is divided into two 5-year periods with 1-year overlap (from August 2000 to July 2005 and from August 2004 to July 2009) to represent the high-to-moderate and moderate-to-low solar activity conditions, respectively. The CH-Therm-2018 model describes the thermospheric density as a function of seven key parameters, namely the height, solar flux index, season (day of year), magnetic local time, geographic latitude and longitude, as well as magnetic activity represented by the solar wind merging electric field. Predictions of the CH-Therm-2018 model agree well with CHAMP observations (within 20 %) and show different features of thermospheric mass density during the two solar activity levels, e.g., the March-September equinox asymmetry and the longitudinal wave pattern. From the analysis of satellite laser ranging (SLR) observations of the ANDE-Pollux satellite during August-September 2009, we estimate 6 h scaling factors of the thermospheric mass density provided by our model and obtain the median value equal to 1:267±0:60. Subsequently, we scale up our CHTherm-2018 mass density predictions by a scale factor of 1.267. We further compare the CH-Therm-2018 predictions with the Naval Research Laboratory Mass Spectrometer Incoherent Scatter Radar Extended (NRLMSISE-00) model. The result shows that our model better predicts the density evolution during the last solar minimum (2008-2009) than the NRLMSISE-00 model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interannual to decadal sea level trends are indicators of climate variability and change. A major source of global and regional sea level data is satellite radar altimetry, which relies on precise knowledge of the satellite's orbit. Here, we assess the error budget of the radial orbit component for the TOPEX/Poseidon mission for the period 1993 to 2004 from a set of different orbit solutions. The errors for seasonal, interannual (5-year), and decadal periods are estimated on global and regional scales based on radial orbit differences from three state-of-the-art orbit solutions provided by different research teams: the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), the Groupe de Recherche de Géodésie Spatiale (GRGS), and the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The global mean sea level error related to orbit uncertainties is of the order of 1mm (8% of the global mean sea level variability) with negligible contributions on the annual and decadal timescales. In contrast, the orbitrelated error of the interannual trend is 0.1mmyr-1 (27% of the corresponding sea level variability) and might hamper the estimation of an acceleration of the global mean sea level rise. For regional scales, the gridded orbit-related error is up to 11 mm, and for about half the ocean the orbit error accounts for at least 10% of the observed sea level variability. The seasonal orbit error amounts to 10% of the observed seasonal sea level signal in the Southern Ocean. At interannual and decadal timescales, the orbit-related trend uncertainties reach regionally more than 1mmyr-1. The interannual trend errors account for 10% of the observed sea level signal in the tropical Atlantic and the south-eastern Pacific. For decadal scales, the orbit-related trend errors are prominent in a several regions including the South Atlantic, western North Atlantic, central Pacific, South Australian Basin, and the Mediterranean Sea. Based on a set of test orbits calculated at GFZ, the sources of the observed orbit-related errors are further investigated. The main contributors on all timescales are uncertainties in Earth's time-variable gravity field models and on annual to interannual timescales discrepancies of the tracking station subnetworks, i.e. satellite laser ranging (SLR) and Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sea Level is a very sensitive index of climate change since it integrates the impacts of ocean warming and ice mass loss from glaciers and the ice sheets. Sea Level has been listed as an Essential Climate Variable (ECV) by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS). During the past 25 years, the sea level ECV has been measured from space by different altimetry missions that have provided global and regional observations of sea level variations. As part of the Climate Change Initiative (CCI) program of the European Space Agency (ESA) (established in 2010), the Sea Level project (SL_cci) aimed at providing an accurate and homogeneous long-term satellite-based sea level record. At the end of the first phase of the project (2010-2013), an initial version (v1.1) of the sea level ECV has been made available to users (Ablain et al., 2015). During the second phase (2014-2017), improved altimeter standards have been selected to produce new sea level products (called SL_cci v2.0) based on 9 altimeter missions for the period 1993-2015 (https://doi.org/10.5270/esa-sea_level_cci-1993_2015-v_2.0-201612). Corresponding orbit solutions, geophysical corrections and altimeter standards used in this v2.0 dataset are described in details in Quartly et al. (2017). The present paper focuses on the description of the SL_cci v2.0 ECV and associated uncertainty and discusses how it has been validated. Various approaches have been used for the quality assessment such as internal validation, comparisons with sea level records from other groups and with in-situ measurements, sea level budget closure analyses and comparisons with model outputs. Compared to the previous version of the sea level ECV, we show that use of improved geophysical corrections, careful bias reduction between missions and inclusion of new altimeter missions lead to improved sea level products with reduced uncertainties at different spatial and temporal scales. However, there is still room for improvement since the uncertainties remain larger than the GCOS requirements. Perspectives for subsequent evolutions are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract. Sea level is an essential climate variable (ECV) that has a direct effect on many people through inundations of coastal areas, and it is also a clear indicator of climate changes due to external forcing factors and internal climate variability. Regional patterns of sea level change inform us on ocean circulation variations in response to natural climate modes such as El Niño and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and anthropogenic forcing. Comparing numerical climate models to a consistent set of observations enables us to assess the performance of these models and help us to understand and predict these phenomena, and thereby alleviate some of the environmental conditions associated with them. All such studies rely on the existence of long-term consistent high-accuracy datasets of sea level. The Climate Change Initiative (CCI) of the European Space Agency was established in 2010 to provide improved time series of some ECVs, including sea level, with the purpose of providing such data openly to all to enable the widest possible utilisation of such data. Now in its second phase, the Sea Level CCI project (SL_cci) merges data from nine different altimeter missions in a clear, consistent and well-documented manner, selecting the most appropriate satellite orbits and geophysical corrections in order to further reduce the error budget. This paper summarises the corrections required, the provenance of corrections and the evaluation of options that have been adopted for the recently released v2.0 dataset (https://doi.org/10.5270/esa-sea_level_cci-1993_2015-v_2.0-201612). This information enables scientists and other users to clearly understand which corrections have been applied and their effects on the sea level dataset. The overall result of these changes is that the rate of rise of global mean sea level (GMSL) still equates to ∼ 3.2 mm yr−1 during 1992–2015, but there is now greater confidence in this result as the errors associated with several of the corrections have been reduced. Compared with v1.1 of the SL_cci dataset, the new rate of change is 0.2 mm yr−1 less during 1993 to 2001 and 0.2 mm yr−1 higher during 2002 to 2014. Application of new correction models brought a reduction of altimeter crossover variances for most corrections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interannual to decadal sea level trends are indicators of climate variability and change. A major source of global and regional sea level data is satellite radar altimetry, which relies on precise knowledge of the satellite's orbit. Here, we assess the error budget of the radial orbit component for the TOPEX/Poseidon mission for the period 1993 to 2004 from a set of different orbit solutions. Upper bound errors for seasonal, interannual (5 years), and decadal periods are estimated on global and regional scales based on radial orbit differences from three state-of-the-art orbit solutions provided by different research teams (GFZ, GSFC, and GRGS). The global mean sea level error related to the orbit is of the order of 7 mm (more than 10 % of the sea level variability) with negligible contributions on the annual and decadal time scale. In contrast, the orbit related error of the interannual trend is 0.1 mm/year (18 % of the corresponding sea level variability) and might hamper the estimation of an acceleration of the global mean sea level rise. For regional scales, the gridded orbit related error is up to 11 mm and for about half the ocean the orbit error accounts for at least 10 % of the observed sea level variability. The seasonal orbit error amounts to 10 % of the observed seasonal sea level signal in the Southern Ocean. At interannual and decadal time scales, the orbit related trend uncertainties reach regionally more than 1 mm/year. The interannual trend errors account for 10 % of the observed sea level signal in the Tropical Atlantic and the south-eastern Pacific. For decadal scales, the orbit related trend errors are prominent in a couple of regions including: South Atlantic, western North Atlantic, central Pacific, South Australian Basin, and Mediterranean Sea. Based on a set of test orbits calculated at GFZ, the sources of the observed orbit related errors are further investigated. Main contributors on all time scales are uncertainties in Earth's time variable gravity field models and on annual to interannual time scales discrepancies of the tracking station sub-networks, i.e., SLR and DORIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]