Search

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a medical condition that can lead to intracranial hypertension, negatively impacting patients’ outcomes. This review article explores the underlying pathophysiology that causes increased intracranial pressure (ICP) during hospitalization. Hydrocephalus, brain swelling, and intracranial hematoma could produce an ICP rise. Although cerebrospinal fluid withdrawal via an external ventricular drain is commonly used, ICP monitoring is not always consistently practiced. Indications for ICP monitoring include neurological deterioration, hydrocephalus, brain swelling, intracranial masses, and the need for cerebrospinal fluid drainage. This review emphasizes the importance of ICP monitoring and presents findings from the Synapse-ICU study, which supports a correlation between ICP monitoring and treatment with better patient outcomes. The review also discusses various therapeutic strategies for managing increased ICP and identifies potential areas for future research.

Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and its management in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is variable worldwide. The present study aimed to explore the practice of ICP monitoring, its variability across countries, and the association with 6-month outcomes in aSAH. Methods: This was a preplanned subanalysis of SYNAPSE-ICU, a multicenter, international, prospective, observational cohort study focused on patients diagnosed with aSAH. We evaluated the variability in ICP monitoring across countries through a logistic regression model adjusted for case-mix and considered countries as a random effect. The association between ICP probe insertion and 6-month mortality and a poor neurological outcome, defined as an Glasgow Outcome Score Extended ≤ 4, was assessed by using a propensity score approach. Results: A total of 423 patients with aSAH from 92 centers across 32 countries were included in this analysis. ICP monitoring was used in 295 (69.7%) patients. Significant between-country variability in ICP insertion was observed, with an incidence ranging between 4.7% and 79.9% (median odd ratio 3.04). The median duration of ICP monitoring was 12 days (first quartile [Q1] through third quartile [Q3] range 8–18), with an overall daily median ICP value of 14 mm Hg (Q1–Q3 10–19) and a median maximum value of 21 mm Hg (Q1–Q3 16–30). Patients monitored with ICP received more aggressive therapy treatments compared with non-monitored patients (therapy intensity level, TIL, score 10.33 [standard deviation 3.61] vs. 6.3 [standard deviation 4.19], p < 0.001). In more severe patients, ICP monitoring was significantly associated with better 6-month outcome (poor neurological outcome: odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.02–0.53, p = 0.0113; mortality: hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.13–0.49, p < 0.0001). However, no significant effect was observed in patients with both reactive pupils. Conclusions: Our cohort demonstrated high variability in