Search

Background: Disproportionate rates of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people are often attributed to risk-taking behaviours, but research rarely conducts direct comparison with their non-Indigenous peers to address this negative discourse. Methods: 'Let's Talk About It 2019' was a cross-sectional online survey of South Australians (16–29 years). It prioritised recruitment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander respondents to compare behaviours with non-Indigenous peers using multivariable Poisson regression models. Results: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (n = 231) and non-Indigenous (n = 2062) respondents reported similar condom use (40% vs 43%, P = 0.477) and sexual debut median ages (16 years vs 17 years). Higher proportions of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander respondents reported a recent health check (48% vs 38%, P = 0.002), STIs (60% vs 49%, P < 0.001) and HIV (37% vs 28%, P = 0.006) testing, STI diagnosis (29% vs 21%, P = 0.042), and intoxication during last sex (30% vs 18%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Behaviours associated with STI transmission were mostly similar among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous respondents. Higher STI/HIV testing among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander respondents suggests effectiveness of targeted programs. Interventions targeting substance use and condom use among all young people are needed. Future interventions need to focus beyond behaviours and explore social determinants of health and sexual networks as contributors to disproportionate STI rates. Sexually transmissible infections (STIs) rates among young Australians are increasing with young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples disproportionately affected. Similar patterns of key risk behaviours, and greater engagement in sexual health care among young Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples, refute suggestions that higher STI rates are caused by this population engaging in more risky behaviour compared to their non-Indigenous peers. Social determinants of health and STI rates among sexual networks should be priorities for future research and intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: International travel can increase the risk of exposure to infectious diseases including sexually transmissible infections (STI). Pre-travel medical consultation provides an opportunity for travel-related health risk assessments and advice. This study explored how travel medicine clinicians integrate sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services into clinical practice. Methods: A convenience sample of travel medicine clinicians completed a cross-sectional survey online or via hard-copy disseminated at an annual national Australian travel medicine conference. Results: Of the 67 respondents, most (n , 51; 76.1%) had a postgraduate qualification relevant to travel medicine and 55.2% (n , 37) had worked in travel medicine for over 10 years. Only 22.4% (n , 15) reported conducting a SRH history/STI risk assessment for all travel patients. STI testing pre-departure was conducted on patient request (48, 71.6%), if symptomatic (32, 47.8%) or based on risk history (28, 41.8%). SRH information pre-departure was most frequently provided if prompted by patient questions (n , 42; 62.7%), or based on the patient's history (n , 37; 55.2%). Over half the sample (n , 40; 59.7%) expressed interest in further training in SRH. Conclusion: Providing and engaging with additional training may assist travel medicine clinicians to take a more proactive approach to SRH consultations and STI testing. Additional research is needed to explore models of care that will allow comprehensive SRH and STI services to be integrated into standard pre- and post-travel care. International travel can increase the risk of exposure to infectious diseases including sexually transmissible infections and human immunodeficiency virus. This study explored how travel medicine clinicians integrate sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services into clinical practice. Our findings highlighted gaps in the provision of pre-travel consultation and training needs for SRH among travel medicine clinicians, and the potential for improved promotion of sexual health among travellers to provide important public health benefits for individuals and the wider community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Australia, like many high-income countries, is experiencing a resurgence of infectious syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis. Evaluations of public health notifications and clinical records suggest that healthcare systems may not be providing optimal care to women and their neonates. This study aims to explore the barriers to optimal management of syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis to identify key areas for improvement. Methods: Between 2021 and 2022, 34 healthcare workers (HCW) practicing in south-east Queensland (SEQ) Australia were recruited to complete semi-structured interviews regarding their perceptions towards management of syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis. Interviews were analysed thematically. Results: Thematic analysis identified four themes related to the management of syphilis in pregnancy. These included poor communication between disciplines, services, and teams from delivery through to management and post-delivery, lack of formal internal and external referral pathways, unclear and often complex maternal and congenital syphilis management procedures, and limited HCW knowledge of infectious syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis. Conclusion: As congenital syphilis numbers continue to rise in SEQ, it is imperative that healthcare systems and HCWs identify and address gaps in the provision of health care. Syphilis in pregnancy can have life-long health impacts for mothers and babies and is on the rise in many high-income countries such as Australia. Healthcare providers are vital in improving outcomes for mothers and babies, but our findings show optimal management is hindered by poor communication, unclear guidelines, and knowledge deficits. To improve the provision of care offered it is important for healthcare systems address this multi-faceted issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Increasing rates of syphilis in pregnancy (SiP) in Australia and other high-income countries, has led to the resurgence of congenital syphilis. Suboptimal syphilis screening during pregnancy has been identified as a key contributing factor. Methods: This study aimed to explore, from the perspective of multidisciplinary healthcare providers (HCPs), the barriers to optimal screening during the antenatal care (ANC) pathway. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 34 HCPs across multiple disciplines practising in south-east Queensland (SEQ) were analysed through a process of reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Barriers were found to occur at the system level of ANC, through difficulties in patient engagement in care, limitations in the current model of health care delivery and limitations in the communication pathways across health care disciplines; and at the individual HCP level, through HCP knowledge and awareness of epidemiological changes in syphilis in SEQ, and adequately assessing patient risk. Conclusion: It is imperative that the healthcare systems and HCPs involved in ANC address these barriers to improve screening in order to optimise management of women and prevent congenital syphilis cases in SEQ. Over the past decade, the rates of syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis are continuing to rise in south-east Queensland (SEQ). Screening for syphilis during antenatal care is an important factor for prevention. In our study, SEQ healthcare providers identified system-level and individual-level barriers that prevent adequate screening. It is important that these barriers be identified and addressed to improve screening to promote maternal health and prevent congenital syphilis in SEQ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 'Australian Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Management Guidelines For Use In Primary Care' (www.sti.guidelines.org.au) provide evidence-based, up-to-date guidance targeted at use in primary care settings. A major review of the guidelines was undertaken in 2020-22. All content was reviewed and updated by a multi-disciplinary group of clinical and non-clinical experts, and assessed for appropriateness of recommendations for key affected populations and organisational and jurisdictional suitability. The guidelines are divided into six main sections: (1) standard asymptomatic check-up; (2) sexual history; (3) contact tracing; (4) STIs and infections associated with sex; (5) STI syndromes; and (6) populations and situations. This paper highlights important aspects of the guidelines and provides the rationale for significant changes made during this major review process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]