Search

William D Chey,1 Darren M Brenner,2 Brooks D Cash,3 Martin Hale,4 Jeremy Adler,5 Mansi S Jamindar,6 Carol B Rockett,6 June S Almenoff,6 Enoch Bortey,7 Jeffrey Gudin8 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 3Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; 4Gold Coast Research, L.L.C, Miami, FL, USA; 5Pacific Pain Medicine Consultants, Encinitas, CA, USA; 6Medical Affairs, RedHill Biopharma, Inc, Raleigh, NC, USA; 7Pharmaceutical Development Strategies, L.L.C, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 8Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USACorrespondence: June S Almenoff, Email jalmenoff@redhillus.comObjective: This study evaluates the onset, magnitude, and consistency of improvement of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) symptoms with naloxegol treatment.Methods: This was a pooled analysis of two Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies (KODIAC-04/05, NCT01309841/NCT01323790) in patients with chronic non-cancer pain and OIC treated with naloxegol 25mg or 12.5mg daily. This analysis assessed improvements in response rates, frequency of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) and complete SBMs (CSBM), OIC constipation symptoms (straining, stool consistency), time to first post-dose SBM and CSBM, and onset of adverse events over the 12-week period.Subjects: The population of 1337 subjects had a mean age of 52 years and mean duration of opioid use of 3.6 years at baseline. Mean SBM frequency was 1.4/week.Results: Naloxegol 25mg and 12.5mg demonstrated significantly higher response rates vs placebo (PBO) [41.9% (P < 0.001), 37.8% (P = 0.008), 29.4% respectively]. Rapid (within 1 week) and sustained (over 12 weeks) symptom improvement was significantly greater for naloxegol vs PBO (P < 0.05). Both doses showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in straining, stool consistency, number of SBMs and CSBMs/wk. Significantly shorter times to first post-dose SBM and CSBM were observed with naloxegol vs PBO (SBM HR: 25mg = 1.90, 12.5mg= 1.60; CSBM HR: 25mg = 1.42, 12.5mg = 1.36; P < 0.001 for each regimen). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the naloxegol 25mg group and were most frequently reported during the first week.Conclusion: In patients with chronic non-cancer pain, naloxegol 25mg and 12.5mg demonstrated significantly higher response rates and rapid and sustained improvements in OIC symptoms compared with PBO.Keywords: opioid-induced constipation, naloxegol, clinical trials

Darren M Brenner,1 Spencer D Dorn,2 Ronald P Fogel,3 Jennifer Christie,4 Adam P Laitman,5 Jonathan Rosenberg6 1Internal Medicine-Gastroenterology, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 3Digestive Health Center of Michigan, Chesterfield, MI, USA; 4Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; 5Salix Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 6GI Alliance of Illinois, Gurnee, IL, USACorrespondence: Darren M Brenner, MD, FACG, AGAF, RFF, Northwestern Memorial Hospital/Arkes Family Pavilion, 676 N St Clair Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA, Tel +1 312 695 8132, Fax +1 312 695 3999, Email Darren.Brenner@nm.orgPurpose: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) experience abdominal pain with altered bowel movements. Plecanatide is indicated as IBS-C treatment in adults. This integrated analysis further characterizes plecanatide efficacy and safety in IBS-C.Patients and Methods: Data pooled from 2 identically designed phase 3 trials included adults with IBS-C randomized to plecanatide 3 mg or 6 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. A daily diary recorded stool frequency/symptoms, with abdominal pain, bloating, cramping, discomfort, fullness, and straining intensity individually rated. Overall response (primary endpoint) was defined as ≥ 30% improvement from baseline in average worst abdominal pain severity and increase of ≥ 1 complete spontaneous bowel movement, during same week (composite), for ≥ 6 of 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included sustained response (overall response, plus meeting weekly composite criteria during ≥ 2 of last 4 treatment weeks) and changes from baseline in individual symptoms. Safety assessments included adverse event monitoring.Results: Overall, 2176 patients (74.0% female; mean [SD] age, 43.5 [14.1] years) were included in efficacy analyses (plecanatide 3 mg [n = 724], 6 mg [n = 723], placebo [n = 729]). A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved overall response with plecanatide 3 mg (25.6%) and 6 mg (26.7%) versus placebo (16.0%; both P < 0.001 vs placebo). A significantly greater percentage of patients were sustained responders with plecanatide 3 mg (24.3%) and 6 mg (25.6%) versus placebo (15.6%; both P < 0.001 vs placebo). Significant improvements from baseline in abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, abdominal pain, bloating, and cramping occurred as early as Week 1 (Week 2 for abdominal pain) with plecanatide and were maintained through Week 12 versus placebo. Diarrhea, the most common adverse event, occurred in 4.3% (3 mg), 4.0% (6 mg) and 1.0% (placebo) of patients, leading to study discontinuation in 1.2%, 1.4%, and 0 patients, respectively.Conclusion: Plecanatide is safe and effective for treating global and individual IBS-C symptoms.Keywords: abdominal pain, bloating, functional GI disorders, guanylate cyclase-C agonist, irritable bowel syndrome

Emily K Stern, Darren M Brenner Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA Abstract: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is an increasingly prevalent problem in the USA due to the growing use of opioids. A novel class of therapeutics, the peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), has been developed to mitigate the deleterious effects of opioids in the gastrointestinal tract while maintaining central analgesia and minimizing opioid withdrawal. This review aimed to summarize the literature on naldemedine, the third PAMORA to gain US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of OIC in adults with chronic noncancer pain-related syndromes. Naldemedine has a chemical structure similar to naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, with chemical modifications that limit its ability to cross the blood–brain barrier. Naldemedine was evaluated in two Phase II and three Phase III clinical trials prior to gaining FDA approval. In two pivotal identical Phase III trials, COMPOSE-I (NCT 01965158) and COMPOSE-II (NCT 01993940), patients receiving naldemedine were significantly more likely to respond when compared with placebo (COMPOSE-I: 47.6 vs 34.6%, P=0.002 and COMPOSE-II: 52.5 vs 33.6%, P

Lynn R Webster,1 Darren M Brenner,2 Andrew C Barrett,3 Craig Paterson,3 Enoch Bortey,3 William P Forbes3 1PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 3Salix, a Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA Background: Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone is efficacious and well tolerated for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) but may theoretically disrupt opioid-mediated analgesia. Methods: Opioid use, pain intensity, and opioid withdrawal (Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale [OOWS] and Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale [SOWS] scores) were reported in a randomized, double-blind trial with an open-label extension (RCT) and an open-label trial (OLT) evaluating safety in adults with chronic noncancer pain. In the RCT, patients taking ≥50 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily with 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Methylnaltrexone did not affect opioid-mediated analgesia in patients with chronic noncancer pain and OIC. Keywords: Relistor, mu-opioid receptor, antagonist, opioids, tolerance, withdrawal

Webster LR, Brenner DM, Barrett AC, Paterson C, Bortey E, Forbes WP. J Pain Res. 2015;8:771–780.Page 772, left column, line 34, the text “(≥45 mg/kg)” should read “(≥0.45 mg/kg)”.Page 773, left column, Pain intensity, line 4, the text “baseline (BL), day 1, weeks 2 and 4” should read “baseline (BL), weeks 2 and 4”.Page 779, left column, line 16, the text “(ie, 6 weeks)” should read “(ie, 4 weeks)”.Read the original article.