Search

Sihem Lazreg,1 Mohamed Hosny,2 Muhammad A Ahad,3 Mazen M Sinjab,4 Riadh Messaoud,5 Shady T Awwad,6 Antoine Rousseau7 1Ophthalmology Cabinet, Blida, Algeria; 2Refractive and Cornea Service, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Anterior Segment Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Dr Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, DHCC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; 5Department of Ophthalmology, Tahar SFAR University Hospital, Mahdia, Tunisia; 6Department of Ophthalmology, American University of Beirut - Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Bicêtre Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceCorrespondence: Antoine Rousseau, Pierre Testas Building, Bicêtre Hospital, 78 Rue du Général Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France, Tel +33145213690, Email arousseau1010@gmail.comAbstract: In the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA), dry eye disease (DED) is often misdiagnosed or overlooked. This review summarizes a series of conversations with ophthalmologists in the region around a variety of climatic, lifestyle, and iatrogenic factors that contribute to specific features of DED in the MENA region. These considerations are further classified by patient lifestyle and surgical choices. All statements are based on discussions and formal voting to achieve consensus over three meetings. Overall, a deeper understanding of the disease characteristics of DED specific to MENA can better guide local eyecare practitioners on appropriate management and follow-up care. Additionally, population-based studies and patient and physician education on ocular surface diseases, together with the use of culturally appropriate and language-specific questionnaires can help ease the public health burden of DED in this region.Keywords: ocular surface, regional clinical practice, epidemiology, treatment, patient outcomes

Riadh Messaoud,1 Lamia El Fekih,2,3 Anis Mahmoud,1 Hager Ben Amor,4 Radhouane Bannour,5 Serge Doan,6,7 Moncef Khairallah41Department of Ophthalmology, Tahar Sfar University Hospital, Mahdia, Tunisia; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Internal Security Forces Hospital, La Marsa, Tunisia; 3Faculty of Medicine, Tunis-El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia; 4Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia; 5Ophthalmology Private Practice, Monastir, Tunisia; 6Department of Ophthalmology, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France; 7Fondation A de Rothschild, Paris, FrancePurpose: To evaluate the clinical improvement in ocular symptoms and signs in patients suffering from Demodex anterior blepharitis after using a novel cleansing wipe impregnated with 2.5% terpinen-4-ol and 0.2% hyaluronic acid.Study design: This was an exploratory, multicenter, open, randomized, two-parallel group comparative study.Methods: Forty-eight patients with Demodex anterior blepharitis were randomly assigned to apply the sterile wipe T1172 (Blephademodex®), either once daily (n=24, Group 1) or twice daily (n=24, Group 2) for 29 days. Overall ocular discomfort and other individual symptoms were measured using a 0–10 numeric rating scale at Day 8 and Day 29. Ocular signs, including eyelid margin hyperemia and number of cylindrical dandruff, were examined at slit lamp. Overall treatment performance by investigator, patient satisfaction and tolerance were evaluated with questionnaires.Results: Overall ocular discomfort was significantly reduced from baseline (p

Dominique Bremond-Gignac,1,2 Riadh Messaoud,3 Sihem Lazreg,4 Claude Speeg-Schatz,5 Didier Renault,6 Frédéric Chiambaretta7,8 On behalf of the Azithromycin Pediatric Study Group 1Ophthalmology Department, Centre St Victor, University Hospital of Amiens, Picardie Jules Verne University, Amiens, France; 2CNRS FR3636, Paris V University, France; 3Ophthalmology Department, Tahar Sfar University Hospital, Mahdia, Tunisia; 4Dar El Beida, Blida, Algeria; 5Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; 6Laboratoires THÉA, Clermont-Ferrand, France; 7Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France; 8EA 7281 R2D2, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France Purpose: To compare the efficacy of azithromycin 1.5% versus tobramycin 0.3% eyedrops on clinical ocular signs and symptoms of bacterial conjunctivitis in children and to assess the parents’ satisfaction regarding the dosing regimen.Patients and methods: An international, multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, controlled clinical trial conducted in children (1 day to 18 years old) with bulbar conjunctival hyperemia and purulent discharge. Azithromycin 1.5% was administered as 1 drop twice daily for 3 days, and tobramycin 0.3% as 1 drop every 2 hours for 2 days, then 4 times daily for 5 days.Results: A total of 286 patients (mean age: 3.2 years) were enrolled. In children with bacteriologically positive cultures (N=203), azithromycin produced a significantly greater improvement in conjunctival discharge (P