Search

Background: This retrospective cohort study explores a practical approach to acquiring pathogenic microorganisms in patients with bone and joint infections. Methods: From Aug 2018 to Mar 2022, 68 consecutive patients (87 cultures) with bone and joint infection were recruited in this study. All cultures followed the Peking University First Hospital Procedure of Culturing Pathogenic microorganisms for bone and joint infection. Tissue samples were obtained through fluoroscopy-guided biopsy or open debridement. Tissue samples were divided into manual homogenization (MH), manual mixture (MM), and pathological examination. The baseline, antibiotic exposure, laboratory, surgical, and microbial data were reviewed. Independent sample T-test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and Chi-square test were used to detect the difference between patients who received different processing measures. Results: The average age was 55.8± 2.4 years old. Thirty-nine patients were male. The total positive culture rate of the manual homogenization group was 80.5% (70/87). Thirty-five patients had mixed infections with more than one microorganism cultured. Staphylococci accounted for 60.23% of all microorganisms. Staphylococcus aureus (18.2%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (15.9%) were the two most common bacteria cultured in this study. Patients with positive culture in the manual mixture group had significantly higher WBC (p = 0.006), NE% (p = 0.024), ESR (p = 0.003), CRP (p = 0.020) and IL6 (0.050) compared to patients with negative culture. After tissue homogenization, only ESR is still statistically different. Patients without SIRS had a low positive culture rate (59.4%). Tissue homogenization could significantly increase the positive culture rate of patients without SIRS. Pre-culture antibiotic exposure was not an independent risk factor for culture results. Conclusion: Peking University First Hospital Procedure for Culturing Pathogenic microorganisms for Bone and Joint Infections was a practical approach for obtaining pathogenic microorganisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

aimed to investigate the effects of manual homogenization on the sensitivity of microbiological culture for patients with pyogenic spondylitis. Methods: From October 2018 to March 2021, patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided biopsy or open debridement due to pyogenic spondylitis were recruited. Their demographic data and baseline characteristics were recorded. Tissue samples were obtained through fluoroscopy-guided biopsy or open debridement. Tissue samples were divided into three parts: manual homogenization (MH), manual mixture (MM), and pathological examination. Sterile normal saline was set as the negative control to exclude false-positive culture results. The Chi-square test was used to detect the difference of microbiological culture results. Results: Twenty-four consecutive patients (33 tissue cultures) with pyogenic spondylitis treated in our department between October 2018 and March 2021 were recruited in this study. The average age was 61.7± 3.2 years old and 10 patients were female. The MH group had a significantly higher positive rate compared with the MM group in aerobic conditions: 78.8% (26 isolates) vs 54.5% (18 isolates), P=0.037 and anaerobic condition: 63.6% (21 isolates) vs 39.4% (13 isolates), P=0.049. The results of subgroup analyses showed that MH could improve the culture sensitivity for patients with previous antibiotics use and without paravertebral abscesses but not reach a significant level on statistics. Conclusion: Based on the present study, manual homogenization could improve the sensitivity of microbiological cultures for patients with pyogenic spondylitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative safety and efficacy of minimally invasive tubular surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Methods: A total of 161 consecutive patients with spinal metastasis between June 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 36 patients were included in this study, 14 patients underwent minimally invasive tubular surgery (M), and 22 patients underwent conventional surgery (C). T-test and chi-square tests were used to evaluate demographic and perioperative data differences between the two groups. Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between M and C groups except for the SINS (p=0.002) and preoperative Alb (p=0.026). There was no significant difference in operative time and complications between M and C groups (p< 0.05). The M group had less mean blood loss than the C group (1275 vs 718mL, p=0.045). Blood transfusion was comparable between the two groups (p< 0.05). The mean amount and drainage time were lower than the C group (141 vs 873mL, p< 0.001; 3.1 vs 7.0 days, P< 0.001). The mean postoperative hospitalization of the M group was 8.8 days, which was lower than the C group (11.3 days, p=0.045). Sub-analysis showed that for patients with hyper-vascular tumor, the M group had less mean amount and time of drainage compared with the C group (p< 0.05); for patients with hypo-vascular tumor, the mean blood loss and amount of blood transfusion were also reduced in M group (p< 0.05). The mean blood loss and drainage time of patients with hypo-vascular tumors were less than patients with hyper-vascular tumors in the M group (p< 0.05). Conclusion: In selected cases, minimally invasive tubular surgery is safe and effective for patients with spinal metastasis. Patients with hypo-vascular tumors were more suitable for this technique with less blood loss, fewer blood transfusions, minor drainage, and shorter postoperative hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of timing of surgery on neurological recovery for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).Methods: According to the timing of surgery, 75 patients with incomplete paraplegia caused by MSCC were assigned to 3 groups: within 3 days (group A), between 4 days and 7 days (group B), and after 7 days (group C). T-test, one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Chi-square test were used to evaluate the difference in the improvement of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and ambulatory status, the incidence of perioperative complications, surgical site infection, and the length of hospital stay between 3 groups.Results: Patients with incomplete paraplegia treated in our department had an average of 17.4±1.8 days delayed and most occurred before hospitalization (4.0±0.4 vs 13.2±1.8, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the AIS improvement between patients with different pre-op AIS. The timing of surgery was significantly correlated with AIS improvement (correlation coefficient=-0.257, P=0.019). Sub-analysis showed that patients who underwent surgery within 7 days (group A and group B) had significantly better AIS improvement compared with group C (improved at least 1 grade, P=0.043; improved more than 1 grade, P=0.039) and the surgery timing was more important for patients with AIS B and C. The timing of surgery was significantly correlated with the length of hospital stay (correlation coefficient=0.335, P=0.003). Patients of group C had the longest length of hospital stay (P=0.002). The incidence of perioperative complications and surgical site infection did not differ significantly between the 3 groups.Conclusion: Delay surgery was common in incomplete paraplegia patients with MSCC. Patients with AIS B and C who underwent surgery within 7 days had better AIS improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]