1. Use of medication lists: A population-based approach to increase the prevalence of medication lists within a region in Germany. A pre-post study
- Author
-
Beate Strauß, Cornelia Mahler, Gerda Bernhard, Ulrich Wehrmann, Joachim Szecsenyi, Hanna M. Seidling, Walter E. Haefeli, and Cornelia Straßner
- Subjects
050101 languages & linguistics ,Prescription Drugs ,Population ,MEDLINE ,02 engineering and technology ,Population based ,Drug treatment ,Information campaign ,General Practitioners ,Germany ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Humans ,Medicine ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Pharmacology (medical) ,education ,Aged ,Pharmacology ,Response rate (survey) ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Data Collection ,05 social sciences ,020201 artificial intelligence & image processing ,business ,Medication list ,Demography - Abstract
Objectives Patient-centered medication lists are a useful documentation method to support safe drug treatment, but they are still inconsistently used and are of varying quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an information campaign on the prevalence and use of medication lists. Material and methods We launched a population-based, low-threshold information campaign within a large region in Germany in order to sensitize the population to the use of medication lists. A survey was sent out at baseline and after 18 months to 5,340 citizens aged ≥ 65 years, covering ~ 4% of the region's population. Results The response rate was 49.4% (N = 2,640) at baseline and 45.4% (N = 2,427) at follow-up. Sociodemographic details of respondents were similar at both time-points as was the possession rate of a medication list among participants with regular medicine intake (51.6%, N = 1,181/2,288 vs. 51.4%, N = 1,082/2,107). Combining baseline and follow-up data, respondents indicated that their general practitioner was involved in issuing the list most often (N = 1,668/2,263, 73.7%), however, in 195 cases (8.6%), respondents indicated being solely responsible for the list. The majority (90.8%, N = 2,055/2,263) indicated having their list in use for longer than 1 year, but for only half of those, the list was updated within the last year. After the intervention, 6% of the respondents indicated being familiar with the campaign those being more likely to possess a list (69.7% N = 83/119 vs. 50.2% N = 999/1,988). Conclusion The campaign did not change overall possession rate, but respondents who were familiar with the campaign were more likely to possess such a list.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF