Search

Background: Echocardiography is currently the noninvasive method of choice to screen patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) for pulmonary hypertension (PH) by estimating systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). However, radiological options are also available by determining the main pulmonary artery (MPA) diameter in the setting of CT angiography. The aim of the present study was to compare cardiovascular biomarkers with the MPA diameter to allow other ways of detecting PH in patients with severe AS., Methods: One hundred ninety-four patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) were included in this study and were divided into two groups based on the CT-angiographically determined MPA diameter. In accordance with ESC guidelines, a cut-off value of 29 mm was determined in this study, with the absence of PH defined by an MPA diameter <29 mm (N79/194) and the presence of PH defined by an MPA diameter ≥29 mm (115/194). Immediately before interventional aortic valve replacement, blood samples were drawn from the subjects and relevant cardiovascular biomarkers such as BNP, cTnI, GDF-15, H-FABP, IGF-BP2 and suPAR were assessed., Results: Patients with an MPA diameter ≥29 mm had significantly higher BNP (P=0.004), cTnI (P=0.039) and H-FABP (P=0.015) plasma levels, whereas GDF-15 (P=0.140), IGF-BP2 (P=0.088) and suPAR (P=0.140) showed no significant differences. In addition, cut-off values were calculated to predict an MPA diameter ≥29 mm. Significant results were shown with 1634.00 pg/mL for BNP (P=0.004), with 16.50 pg/mL for cTnI (P=0.039) and with 1.16 ng/mL for H-FABP (P=0.016). In a combined biomarker analysis, the 2-way combination of BNP and IGF-BP2 (AUC 0.671; 95%CI 0.538-0.805; P=0.023) and the 3-way combination of BNP, H-FABP and IGF-BP2 (AUC 0.685; 95%CI 0.551-0.818; P=0.015) showed the best results. Biomarker follow-up at 3 and 12 months after TAVR did not require additional information gain. Regarding 1-year survival, no significant difference could be detected between patients with an MPA diameter<29 mm compared to patients with ≥29 mm (log-rank test: P=0.262)., Conclusions: The MPA diameter remains a controversial parameter for the detection of PH in patients with severe AS. Standing on its own, this non-invasive parameter may not be precise enough to detect PH accurately. Combining this parameter with several biomarkers did not provide significant additional information.

Introduction: Up to 50% of patients suffering from acute decompensated heart failure show normal or slightly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This syndrome, which is known as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with increasing age. Epidemiological studies could portrait an increasing importance and an even emerging prevalence in the past decades. Still, there is currently no evidenced based medical treatment option available. Our aims were to identify upcoming trends and emerging concepts and to point out important centers in the global research of HFpEF., Evidence Acquisition: We performed a bibliometric study on current science in the field of HFpEF to identify study characteristics, impact factors and the countries of origin of basic and clinical studies that were published within the years 2009 to 2016. We further prepared density equalizing maps for visualization of the obtained data., Evidence Synthesis: A total of 5413 studies was screened, of which 794 were found eligible. The scientific output in clinical studies rose from 25 in 2009 to 165 in 2016. Most of the publications had a clinical topic, followed by studies on new imaging techniques. Basic research trials were by far beyond. The USA, Japan and Germany were identified as the most important national contributors to global scientific output., Conclusions: This first bibliometric study in the field of HFpEF shows a substantial increase of research within the last decade, mainly in the USA, Japan, and continental Europe. As an ongoing therapeutic trend in this field, we identified RAAS-blockade and 5-phosphodiesterase-inhibition.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valuable treatment option for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and low-flow/low-gradient (LF/LG) aortic stenosis (AS). According to current literature, the presence of severe AS is unlikely in case of severely reduced LVEF and mean pressure gradient (meanPG) below 30 mmHg. However, a considerable number of patients presenting with typical clinical symptoms of severe AS, show gradients below 30 mmHg. We hypothesized, that these patients undergoing TAVI do have a measurable clinical benefit and an improved LVEF., Methods: In this single center retrospective cohort study, data from 1199 patients undergoing TAVI between 2013 and 2017 was analyzed. A 6-month follow-up was performed to assess changes in NT-proBNP, NYHA-class, and LVEF., Results: Thirty patients presented with LVEF<35%, an aortic valve area (AVA<1 cm 2 ), and a meanPG below 30 mmHg. Mean logistic EuroSCORE II was 24.05±10.9. Most patients (56%) showed improved NYHA-class upon follow-up. NT-proBNP-levels decreased from 3.901 pg/mL IQR 10.880 to 1.491 pg/mL IQR 2.245 (P<0.001). LVEF increased from 30% IQR 6.25 to 40% IQR 15 (P<0.001)., Conclusions: Based on our findings TAVI represents a valuable treatment option even in patients with LF/LG AS and PGmean below 30mmHg.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to provide an economic assessment of interventional vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in the context of cost-effectiveness. Aortic stenosis represents the most common form of degenerative valvular heart diseases. As life expectancy increases, an even emerging prevalence is expected. Over decades, surgical replacement was considered as the method of choice. Up to one third of the patients were not eligible for surgery, as their estimated peri-operative risk was too high. In the early 2000s a catheter-based technique has been developed, being an alternative treatment option for patients, considered to be inoperable., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic analysis of current literature was performed from September 2018 to December 2018. All suitable data in the field was obtained from Pubmed and Google/Google scholar. The search terms "TAVI AND costs," "TAVR and costs" and "aortic valve replacement AND costs" was entered in the search field, showing an overall amount of 317 publications. In a next step all obtained publications were screened by expert hand selection., Evidence Synthesis: Recently the Food and Drug Association (FDA) approved transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the low-risk setting. Nevertheless, concerns on the higher price remain. We performed an analysis of current literature on aortic stenosis and economic aspects. Out of 322 screened publications, 7 studies were found eligible by expert hand selection. Based on the predefined payment readiness of the analyzed healthcare system, TAVR appeared to have a slightly better cost effectiveness. Initial results within the early era seemed to be inconsistent. Recent publications showed, TAVR might be of more cost effectiveness when using the newest generation devices and a profound clinical experience is guaranteed., Conclusions: We assume, that TAVR will not only be the method of choice for the treatment of aortic stenosis in many patients. As the valves are getting cheaper, TAVR might even be superior to conventional heart surgery from an economic point of view.

Background: Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvulopathy in developed countries. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a therapeutic alternative in symptomatic patients at high or prohibitive perioperative risk. Predilatation by balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) under rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) has been a routine part of TAVI. However, both RVP and BAV carry substantial risks and an increasing number of interventional centers are performing TAVI without predilatation (direct TAVI). A transient decrease of left ventricular function and elevated markers of myocardial injury after TAVI with predilatation were observed in previous studies. In this study, we investigated whether direct TAVI was associated with a similar increase in cardiac biomarkers and decrease in ejection fraction in a cohort of our patients., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI without predilatation using a self-expanding system at a single center between April 2013 and December 2015 were followed up for one year and were retrospectively analyzed regarding mortality, safety and efficacy endpoints as well as common laboratory and echocardiographic parameters., Results: A total of 164 patients (83±6 years; 56% female) were included in the analysis. According to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) criteria the technical success rate was 96.3% and 89.1% of patients remained free of a combined safety endpoint at 30 days. Mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year were 3.0% (N.=5) and 10.4% (N.=17), respectively. TAVI without predilatation was highly effective in lowering aortic valve peak velocity from 4.4±0.6 m/s before to 1.7±0.5 m/s (P<0.01), and mean pressure gradient across the valve from 48.7±15.1 mmHg to 8.3±4.5 mmHg (<0.05). Left ventricular function remained unaltered after the intervention (51±10% prior to TAVI and 51±9% post TAVI), whereas high sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT), a well-established marker for myocardial injury, increased significantly from 26 ng/L (interquartile range=18.00-44.00) to 119 ng/L (interquartile range=73.25-166.00, P<0.001) during this time. Notably, an increase in the plasma levels of hs-TnT >15 times the upper limit of normal was associated with mortality both one month and one year after TAVI., Conclusions: TAVI without predilatation is feasible, safe and effective for aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high perioperative risk. In contrast to a cohort of patients who underwent TAVI with predilatation previously published by another center, our patients did not suffer from transient impairment of left ventricular function. As a marker of myocardial injury, hs-TnT showed a less pronounced increase than reported previously. This might be a marker for a prognostic benefit as hs-TnT has been shown to be a strong predictor of outcome in patients undergoing TAVI. We conclude that direct TAVI is a less invasive option involving less myocardial stress.

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common form of manifestation of atherosclerosis. PAD has a considerable impact on morbidity, hospitalization rates and health-care costs. Biomarkers have been introduced in many cardiovascular disease entities over the last years. However, an analysis on the correlation of biomarker levels and PAD is still lacking., Methods: A total of 106 patients were enrolled in this current study, 51 that were diagnosed with PAD and 55 with excluded coronary and peripheral artery disease as controls. During outpatient visits, plasma samples of all patients were obtained and analyzed for sST2 (hemodynamics and inflammation), galectin-3 (fibrosis and remodeling), GDF-15 (remodeling and inflammation), suPAR (inflammation), and fetuin-A (vascular calcification) by use of ELISA after informed consent., Results: Compared with controls, patients with PAD showed significantly higher levels of sST2 (5248 vs. 7503 pg/mL, P<0.001), suPAR (2267 vs. 2414 pg/mL, P=0.02), galectin-3 (2795 vs. 4494 pg/mL, P<0.001), and GDF-15 (549 vs. 767 pg/mL, P<0.001). Fetuin-A showed a trend towards lower levels in patients with PAD (117 vs. 100 ng/mL, P=0.119)., Conclusions: Circulating levels of sST2, suPAR, galectin-3, and GDF-15 were significantly elevated in PAD patients. In contrast, fetuin-A levels showed a decrease in PAD patients indicating increased vascular calcification. Thus, by incorporating different pathophysiological processes present in PAD, tested novel biomarkers facilitate a more precise diagnosis as well as a more accurate evaluation of disease severity and progression.