Search

Background: Despite a large amount of literature focused on pharmacologic and surgical therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), little is known about clinical presentation and management of outpatient clinic patients. We aimed to conduct a tailored analysis of BPH-affected patients, comparing men with known BPH versus newly diagnosed. The analysis was made through International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and BPH Impact index (BII)., Methods: "Intensive prostate benefit" project working group designed a questionnaire prospectively administered by urologists to patients affected by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to BPH., Results: Overall, 3198 (64%) patients were previously diagnosed with BPH versus 1800 (36%) received a first diagnosis. Patients previously diagnosed with BPH were older (median 69 vs. 66 years) and more comorbid (P<0.001). Moreover, median IPSS score was higher in these patients (16 vs. 14), who also experienced a higher rate of severe symptoms (32.0% vs 21.5%, P<0.0001). At BII, concerns for one's health and time lost due to urinary problems were higher in patients previously diagnosed with BPH (P<0.0001). In these patients, a BPH-specific therapy was already established (88.5% vs. 75.1%) and a higher rate of therapy adherence (55.0% vs. 27.0%, P<0.0001) was observed. Roughly 90% of patients already taking BPH therapy changed their therapy after urological examination. In these patients, supplements/phytotherapeutics, alpha blockers, 5-alfa-reductase inhibitors, were prescribed in 32.8%, 37.4%, 17.4%, respectively., Conclusions: Patients with prior BPH diagnosis have severe LUTS that worsen over time, affecting quality of life despite treatment. LUTS management in primary care is crucial, emphasizing counseling for a healthy lifestyle, cardiovascular risk control, and medication adherence.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a higher prevalence of anxiety-depressive disorders in women with BPS/IC (bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis) than in women with chronic non-neoplastic pain with or without fibromyalgia, to examine possible correlations between urological and psychiatric symptoms., Methods: The patients included in the study were divided into two groups: 1) group 0: patients with an existing diagnosis of BPS/IC. BPS/IC was confirmed by reviewing medical record; group 1+2: patients with chronic non-neoplastic pain, suffering from fibromyalgia or other types of chronic pain (chronic arthralgia or lower back pain). Three questionnaires were administered: PHQ-9 to investigate psychological symptoms, O'Leary Saint (ICSI-ICPI) to investigate urological symptoms in women with BPS/IC and BPI to investigate specifically pain., Results: The survey included 69 patients, 42 patients had a diagnosis of BPS/IC while 27 of them had chronic non-neoplastic pain. The average PHQ-9 Score was 10.3 in BPS/IC group, considered as major depression (score between 10 and 14); the average score of PHQ-9 was 6.9 in group 1+2, as in sub-threshold depression (between 5-9)., Conclusions: The chronic pain of BPS/IC can affect mood more than in other painful conditions, as more than half of this population has a score that identifies depression with the PHQ-9 questionnaire, confirming the hypothesis that the syndrome is associated with a higher prevalence of an anxious-depressive condition.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate intra- and perioperative outcomes of a single high volume open radical prostatectomy (ORP) surgeon, during his learning curve period for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND)., Methods: The study included 264 intermediate-high risk prostate cancer patients, treated by ORP + ePLND or RARP + ePLND, prospectively collected. Descriptive statistics compared clinical and pathological variables between groups. Bivariate (Pearson) correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the number of lymph node (LN) removed, positive surgical margins (PSM), surgical time and the number of procedures performed per group., Results: pT stage and Gleason score (GS) were lower in RARP than in ORP group (both P=0.04), while PSM were more frequent in the RARP group (40% vs. 25%; P=0.02). However, PSM decreased with the increase of RARP procedures. The number of LNs removed was 25 and 22, in RARP and ORP group (P=0.03). However, LN+ rate did not differ between groups (11% vs. 16%; P=0.216). In the RARP group, overall surgical time and ePLND time decreased with the increase of surgical procedures (all P<0.001)., Conclusions: RARP requires significant learning curve to reduce operative room time and obtain PSM comparable to those of an ORP high-volume surgeon. On the contrary, the quality of ePLND during RARP seems to be not related to the number of procedures performed, allowing removal of a number of LNs that is clinically comparable to ORP.

The number of patients on chronic anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy requiring endoscopic urological surgery is increasing worldwide. Therefore, there is a strong demand to standardize the perioperative treatment of this cohort of patients, both from a surgical and cardiological point of view, balancing the risks of bleeding versus thrombosis, and the important possible clinical and medical legal repercussions therein. Although literature is scarce and the quality of evidence quite low, in line with other surgical specialties, guidelines and recommendations for the management of urological patients have begun to emerge. The aim of this review is to analyze current available literature and evidence on the most common endoscopic procedures performed in this high-risk group of patients, focusing on the perioperative management. In particular, to analyze the most frequently performed endoscopic procedures for the treatment of benign prostate enlargement (transurethral resection of the prostate, Thulium, Holmium and greenlight laser prostatectomy), bladder cancer (transurethral resection of the bladder), upper urinary tract urothelial cancer, and nephrolithiasis. Despite the lack of randomized studies, regardless of individual patient considerations, studies would support continuation of acetylsalicylic acid, which is recommended by cardiologists, in patients with intermediate/high risk of coronary thrombosis. In contrast, multiple studies found that bridging with light weight molecular weight heparin can potentially lead to more bleeding than continuation of the anticoagulant(s) and antiplatelet therapy, and caution with bridging is advised. All urologists should familiarize themselves with emerging guidelines and recommendations, and always be prepared to discuss specific cases or scenarios in a dedicated multidisciplinary team.

Background: Open prostatectomy (OP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) have traditionally been the most common surgical approaches for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia causing bladder outlet obstruction and have certainly passed the test of time. In time, many endoscopic surgical procedures have been described as an alternative mini-invasive treatment. Holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) guaranteed functional outcomes similar to OP and TURP with lower perioperative complication rates for any prostate size. With the development of different kinds of lasers (such as thulium, "green light" and diode) and bipolar energy, the feasibility of endoscopic enucleation using these energies has been explored., Evidence Acquisition: In this paper, recent techniques to perform true prostate enucleation have been reviewed through a search of PubMed and Web of Science, including articles published in the last 20 years in clinical journals. The review is based on a peer-review process of the authors after a structured data search. Search terms included "Thulium prostate enucleation, THULEP, TmLEP/Tm Yag enucleation" OR "Greenlight enucleation/prostate enucleation/vapo-enucleation/KTP prostate enucleation, PVP prostate enucleation, GreenLep/" OR "bipolar prostate enucleation" OR "HoLEP, Holmium prostate enucleation" OR "monopolar prostate enucleation" OR "Diode prostate enucleation" OR "DiLEP" OR "Eraser prostate enucleation" OR "ELEP"., Evidence Synthesis: Following the example of HoLEP, many techniques have been described in the literature using a variety of energy sources and instruments either in a pure enucleative or a hybrid (mixed) fashion. However, the levels of evidence are too low and follow-up still too short to offer solid recommendations., Conclusions: HoLEP has become the conceptual and practical paradigm for the wide spread of enucleation thanks to the evidence provided by the literature and excellent outcomes. Higher level of evidence is required to assess efficacy of alternative enucleative techniques.