Search

Initially considered as a kind of radiobiological law, the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, which by definition supports the absence of any threshold for cancer risk induction after irradiation, is nowadays more reasonably described as a pragmatic and prudent approach by the International Organizations. However, it remains today a dogma in radiological protection. Actually, this model had been essentially developed for the radiological protection of a general population against low, and sometimes very low, doses of irradiation. Radiation oncologists are dealing with a totally different situation since they deliver, on purpose, high doses of radiations in more or less limited volumes of the body of cancer patients, patients for whom no other alternatives do exist to get rid of their malignant tumors. Simultaneously, the radiation oncologists inevitably give low and even very low doses at distance from the so-called target volumes. In such a specific situation, what is the carcinogenicity of these low doses and the relevance of the LNT model in radiotherapy? Thus, this paper addresses three critical questions: 1) what is the risk acceptability of the radiation doses delivered by radiotherapy of malignant tumors? 2) what is the real carcinogenic risk of (very) low doses delivered at distance from the target volume? 3) are the clinical radiotherapy data, i.e., the number of second primary cancers, accumulated since more than a century, consistent with the LNT model? In conclusion, the LNT model appears to be poorly adapted to the high doses locally delivered to cancer patients and dramatically overestimates, in most cases, the risk of secondary radio-induced cancers. In fine, the real risk of the LNT model in radiotherapy would be to promote radiophobia in cancer patients and to see some of them turning away from a life-saving treatment.

Forte des travaux pionniers de ses figures historiques emblématiques comme Pierre et Marie Curie, Claudius Regaud ou Antoine Lacassagne, la radiobiologie française se trouve aujourd’hui dans une situation dramatique en matière de ressources humaines et d’expertise, comme la plupart des pays développés. Pourtant, les progrès considérables dans la thérapie des cancers et dans le radiodiagnostic, les enjeux de Défense Nationale et de l’exploration spatiale ainsi qu’une attente sociétale grandissante pour une évaluation objective des risques liés aux radiations ionisantes devrait encourager nos institutions à maintenir et préserver le savoir et le savoir-faire des radiobiologistes. Sans proposer un catalogue des thèmes et des laboratoires, l’objectif de cet article, est de mieux analyser et comprendre l’évolution historique et scientifique de la radiobiologie française pour mieux en dégager les enjeux de demain.