Search

Purpose: Cardiac toxicity is an important sequela of breast radiotherapy. However, the relationship between dose to cardiac structures and subsequent toxicity has not been well defined, partially due to variations in substructure delineation, which can lead to inconsistent dose reporting and the failure to detect potential correlations. Here we have developed a heart atlas and evaluated its effect on contour accuracy and concordance., Methods and Materials: A detailed cardiac computed tomography scan atlas was developed jointly by cardiology, cardiac radiology, and radiation oncology. Seven radiation oncologists were recruited to delineate the whole heart, left main and left anterior descending interventricular branches, and right coronary arteries on four cases before and after studying the atlas. Contour accuracy was assessed by percent overlap with gold standard atlas volumes. The concordance index was also calculated. Standard radiation fields were applied. Doses to observer-contoured cardiac structures were calculated and compared with gold standard contour doses. Pre- and post-atlas values were analyzed using a paired t test., Results: The cardiac atlas significantly improved contour accuracy and concordance. Percent overlap and concordance index of observer-contoured cardiac and gold standard volumes were 2.3-fold improved for all structures (p < 0.002). After application of the atlas, reported mean doses to the whole heart, left main artery, left anterior descending interventricular branch, and right coronary artery were within 0.1, 0.9, 2.6, and 0.6 Gy, respectively, of gold standard doses., Conclusions: This validated University of Michigan cardiac atlas may serve as a useful tool in future studies assessing cardiac toxicity and in clinical trials which include dose volume constraints to the heart., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We sought to determine whether African American men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era differed in initial presenting serum PSA levels (iPSA) compared to white men. Recent retrospective studies have demonstrated higher iPSA within the African American men than in white men at the time of diagnosis, suggestive of more advanced disease in African American men. Both biologic differences and/or sociologic factors have been postulated as explaining the noted differences in iPSA. We reviewed our institution's PSA-era experience to determine any association between race and iPSA., Materials and Methods: Between January 1990 and September 2001, 4519 patients representing a broad demographic sample were seen in the radiation oncology department of a university hospital or one of its four community affiliates. A total of 2332 eligible patients, with data on race, age, year of diagnosis, Gleason score, T stage, and iPSA, were analyzed. The patients were separated into the two following time periods for analysis, based on the new American Cancer Society screening guidelines: (1) 1991 to 1996 and (2) 1997 to 2001. The relationships between race and iPSA, T stage, Gleason score, and age are explored., Results: Of the 2332 patients analyzed, there were 1968 white men and 364 African American men. For the time period 1990 through 1996, the expected average (median) iPSA level was 10.5 (10.2) and 14.6 (15.8) for white men and African American men, respectively. For 1997 to 2001, the expected average iPSA level was 9.5 (8.4) and 10.8 (9.8), respectively. T stage distributions improved, independent of race, toward earlier stage at presentation. Gleason score distribution remained unchanged. African American men are 2.5-3.1 years younger than white men at diagnosis., Conclusions: An overall decline in iPSA has occurred in both racial groups over time. More importantly, racial differences in iPSA among men diagnosed in the later time period (1997 to 2001) are less pronounced compared to men diagnosed in the earlier time period (1990 to 1996). This racial convergence in iPSA over time suggests improved penetrance of PSA screening in the African American population. Our findings also suggest that studies comparing racial differences in iPSA should consider time period of diagnosis and possible sociologic changes during that period (i.e., access to medical care, socioeconomic status, and educational level). The American Cancer Society guideline to begin screening African Americans at an earlier age is appropriate.

Purpose: In Stage I seminoma, treatment with radiation therapy (RT) after radical inguinal orchiectomy reduces the likelihood of relapse by 15%, but does not improve survival, thus making quality of life an important outcome measure. The purpose of this study was to use utilities to assess the quality of life benefits associated with adjuvant RT in this setting., Materials and Methods: One hundred healthy men were interviewed using a utility assessment tool. Utilities for five health states were measured using the standard gamble technique: (A) adjuvant RT with 5% recurrence risk; (B) recurrence after RT, salvaged with chemotherapy; (C) orchiectomy alone with 20% recurrence risk; (D) recurrence after orchiectomy alone, salvaged with RT; and (E) recurrence after orchiectomy alone, salvaged with chemotherapy., Results: The median age was 25. Utilities were highest for nonrecurrent health states, and lowest for recurrence salvaged with chemotherapy. All differences in utilities between health states were significant, except between states A and C and B and E. Variability in utilities was not explained by the sociodemographic factors examined., Conclusions: Our results suggest that healthy males do not value the 15% reduction in recurrence risk achievable with adjuvant RT. However, they do predict that an actual recurrence, especially one requiring salvage chemotherapy, will lead to significant decline in quality of life. We intend to use these utilities to further evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RT in this setting.