Search

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive value of EEG reactivity assessment and confounders for neurological outcome after cardiac arrest., Methods: All consecutive patients admitted in a tertiary cardiac arrest center between 2007 and 2016 still alive 48 h after admission with at least one EEG recorded during coma. EEG reactivity was defined as a reproducible waveform change in amplitude or frequency following standardized stimulation. Each EEG was classified based on American Clinical Neurophysiology Society nomenclatures and classified in highly malignant (including status epilepticus), malignant, or benign EEG. We assessed the predictive values of EEG reactivity and sedation effect for neurologic outcome at ICU discharge using the Cerebral Performance Category scale (with CPC 1-2 assumed as favorable outcome and CPC 3-4-5 considered as poor outcome)., Results: Among 428 patients, a poor outcome was observed in 80% patients. The median time to EEG recording was 3 (1-4) days and 51% patients had a non-reactive EEG. The positive predictive value (PPV) of a non-reactive EEG to predict an unfavorable outcome was 97.1% (IC95% 93.6-98.9), increasing to 98.3% (IC95 94.1-99.8) when the EEG had been performed without sedation. In multivariate analysis, a non-reactive EEG was associated with poor outcome (OR 12.6 IC95% 4.7-33.6; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, concomitant sedation was not statistically associated with EEG non-reactivity. The PPV of a benign EEG to predict favorable outcome was 49.7% (IC95% 41.5-57.9), increasing to 66.2% (IC95% 54.3-76.8) when EEG was recorded earlier, with ongoing sedation., Conclusions: After cardiac arrest, absence of EEG reactivity was predictive of unfavorable outcome. By contrast, a benign EEG was slightly predictive of a favorable outcome. Reactivity assessment may have important implications in the neuroprognostication process after cardiac arrest and could be influenced by sedation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: After out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), the risk of recurrence during the early period is unclear and the indication for anti-arrhythmic treatment is debated. We assessed the incidence and predisposing factors for severe cardiac arrhythmias in this population., Design: Retrospective study in a cardiac arrest center., Settings: The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiac arrhythmias from hospital admission to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge in patients admitted after an OHCA associated with obstructive CAD. A major arrhythmia was defined as any arrhythmic event (auricular or ventricular) associated with cardiac arrest recurrence and/or severe arterial hypotension. Secondary outcomes were time from ICU admission to arrhythmia occurrence and all-cause in-ICU mortality. Risk factors for recurrence of a major arrhythmia were assessed using multivariate analysis., Patients: We included all consecutive OHCA patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) as initial rhythm associated with obstructive CAD, and who had a successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention., Intervention: None., Measurements and Main Results: Among 256 patients, a major arrhythmia occurred in 29 (11.3%), within the first 24 h in 79.3% of cases and were mostly VF (44.8%). Mortality rate was significantly increased in patients with major arrhythmia recurrence (69% vs 41%; p = 0.006). Factor significantly associated with recurrence of severe arrhythmia was male gender (OR 0.32 [0.12-0.92]; p = 0.034). Treatment with prophylactic anti-arrhythmic in the ICU was not associated with a change in the risk of recurrence (OR 0.85 [0.21-3.65], p = 0.82)., Conclusion: An early recurrence of major arrhythmia was observed in more than 10% of post-cardiac arrest patients. These events happened mostly within the first 24 h. The interest of prophylactic anti-arrhythmic treatment remains to be evaluated in this population., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Backgrounds: In survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent and is associated with numerous factors of definitive renal injury. We made the hypothesis that AKI after OHCA was a strong risk factor of long-term chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to evaluate long-term renal outcome of OHCA survivors according the occurrence of AKI in ICU., Methods: We used prospectively collected data from consecutive OHCA patients admitted between 2007 and 2012 in a tertiary medical ICU. AKI was defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Long-term creatinine level was the last blood creatinine assessment we were able to retrieve. The main outcome was the occurrence of CKD, defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) lower than 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 according to the MDRD equation. Long-term mortality was evaluated as well. Factors associated with CKD occurrence were evaluated by competing risk survival analysis (Fine Gray and Cox cause specific models)., Results: Among the 246 OHCA patients who were discharged alive, outcome of 133 patients was available (median age 55 [iqr 46, 68], 75.2% of male). During a median follow-up time of 1.8 [0.8-2.5] years, CKD occurred in 17 (12.7%) patients and 24 (18%) patients died. A previous history of arterial hypertension (sHR = 3.28[1.15;9.39], p = 0.027; CSH = 4.83 [1.57;14.9], p = 0.006), AKI during ICU stay (sHR = 3.72[1.40;9.84], p = 0.008; CSH = 5.41[1.79;16.3], p = 0.003) and an age higher than 55 (sHR = 6.13[1.55;24.3], p = 0.009; CSH = 2.16[1.72;43.8], p = 0.006) were independently associated with CKD occurrence. AKI was not associated with long-term mortality (sHR = 0.73 [0.27;1.99], p = 0.55; CSH = 0.75 [0.28;2.01], p = 0.57)., Conclusion: In OHCA survivors, CKD was a frequent long-term complication. AKI during ICU stay was a strong determinant of long-term CKD occurrence., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although guidelines on post-resuscitation care recommend the use of short-acting agents for sedation during targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest (CA), the potential advantages of this strategy have not been clinically demonstrated., Methods: We compared two sedation regimens (propofol-remifentanil, period P2, vs midazolam-fentanyl, period P1) among comatose TTM-treated CA survivors. Management protocol, apart from sedation and neuromuscular blockers use, did not change between the two periods. Baseline severity was assessed with Cardiac-Arrest-Hospital-Prognosis (CAHP) score. Time to awakening was measured starting from discontinuation of sedation at the end of rewarming. Awakening was defined as delayed when it occurred after more than 48 h., Results: 460 patients (134 in P2, 326 in P1) were included. CAHP score did not significantly differ between P2 and P1 (P = 0.93). Sixty percent of patients awoke in both periods (81/134 vs. 194/326, P = 0.85). Median time to awakening was 2.5 (IQR 1-9) hours in P2 vs. 17 (IQR 7-60) hours in P1. Awakening was delayed in 6% of patients in P2 vs. 29% in P1 (p < 0.001). After adjustment, P2 was associated with significantly lower odds of delayed awakening (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.2; P < 0.001). Patients in P2 had significantly more ventilator-free days (25 vs. 24 days; P = 0.007), and lower catecholamine-free days within day 28. Survival and favorable neurologic outcome at discharge did not differ across periods., Conclusions: During TTM following resuscitation from CA, sedation with propofol-remifentanil was associated with significantly earlier awakening and more ventilator-free days as compared with midazolam-fentanyl., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Respective proportions of final etiologies are disparate in cohorts of cardiac arrest patients, depending on examined population and diagnostic algorithms. In particular, prevalence and characteristics of sudden unexplained death syndrome (SUDS) are debated. We aimed at describing etiologies in a large cohort of aborted out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, in order to assess prevalence and outcome of SUDS., Patients and Methods: We analyzed data from our prospective registry of successfully resuscitated OHCA patients admitted to a cardiac arrest centre between January 2002 and December 2014. The in-ICU diagnostic strategy included early coronary angiogram, brain and chest CT scan. This was completed by an extensive diagnostic strategy, encompassing biological and toxicological tests, repeated electrocardiograms and echocardiography, MRI and pharmacologic tests. Two independent investigators reviewed each final diagnosis. Baseline characteristics were compared between subgroups of patients. Three-month mortality was compared between subgroups using univariate Kaplan-Meier curves., Results: Over the study period, 1657 patients were admitted to our unit after an aborted OHCA. The event was attributed to a non-cardiac and a cardiac cause in 478 (32.0%) and 978 (65.5%) patients, respectively. The main cause of cardiac related OHCA was ischemic heart disease (76.7%) while primary electrical diseases accounted for only 2.5%. Sudden unexplained deaths (SUDS) were observed in 37 (2.5%) patients., Conclusion: We observed that ischemic heart disease was by far the most common cause of cardiac arrest, while primary electrical diseases were much less frequent. SUDS accounted for a very small proportion of patients who suffered an aborted OHCA., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)