Search

The value of soluble receptor for tumor necrosis factor type II (sTNFRII) as a strong and early predictor of HIV disease progression was suggested. Recently it has been reported that sTNFRII may provide an indication of the HIV load. In this work we focused on the relationship between sTNFRII and HIV burden in 95 HIV-1+ patients without AIDS grouped according to the 1993 classification of the CDC as group A, n = 55, and group B, n = 40. Compared with healthy controls, higher values of sTNFRII were obtained in all groups of HIV-1 infected patients (P < 0.001), but we found no inverse correlation between sTNFRII and CD4+ lymphocyte counts in CDC group A and B of the disease, and no correlation with log RNA copy number in patients with CD4 T-cell counts > 499/microl. A correlation was obtained between sTNFRII and the viral load in patients with CD4 T-cell counts ranging from 200 to 499/microl, but only in CDC group B patients (P < 0.01, n = 26). There was no correlation between the variations of sTNFRII and HIV-1 RNA levels in 19 CDC group A and 15 CDC group B clinically stable patients in the course of a short follow up. The plasma level of sTNFRII do not appear as a valuable surrogate marker of the plasma level of HIV-1 RNA in patients. Further investigations are needed to define the mechanism of the raised level of sTNFRII in HIV-1 infected patients.

Interferon alpha (IFNalpha), a type I interferon, can be considered as a viral infection marker because this cytokine is induced during many viral infections. However, it is quite difficult to detect IFNalpha in sera. Investigations are interested in various intra-cellular IFNalpha-induced proteins as viral infection markers. However the activity of these enzymes increased not only in response to type I IFNs but also to type II IFN. MxA protein can be detected in the cytoplasm of IFNalpha/beta-treated cells, whereas other cytokines, including IFNgamma, are poor inducers. Using an immunochemiluminescent assay, we studied MxA protein in whole blood of 34 patients with various viral infections. The whole blood was drawn into sterile vacuum tubes containing heparin or EDTA. MxA values were relatively similar in heparin-treated samples and EDTA-treated samples, with differences not exceeding 1 ng/ml. The levels of MxA protein were compared in whole blood obtained by using two different lysis procedures. A correlation was found between the MxA levels obtained by using procedure I and procedure II, but higher amounts of MxA protein were found with procedure II. The second procedure is rapid and more convenient than the other and it is carried out in one step which reduce technical problems. High levels of MxA protein were found in peripheral blood cells of patients with acute viral infections (Rotavirus, Adenovirus, RSV, CMV), but MxA protein was not elevated in bacterial infections. The MxA levels were also studied in peripheral blood of 32 HCV positive patients. MxA protein was not found in most of IFNalpha-untreated patients, even those with high viral load. In contrast, high levels of MxA protein were found in IFNalpha-treated patients. MxA quantitation can be considered as a specific marker of acute viral infections, and could be useful in the management of treatment with IFNalpha.