Search

Purpose: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is reduced in patients with high left ventricular (LV) scar burden, in particular when scar is located in the LV lateral wall or septum. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can identity scar, but is not feasible in all patients. This study investigates if myocardial metabolism by 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and contractile function by echocardiographic strain are alternatives to LGE-CMR., Methods: In a prospective multicenter study, 132 CRT candidates (91% with left bundle branch block) were studied by speckle tracking strain echocardiography, and 53 of these by FDG-PET. Regional myocardial FDG metabolism and peak systolic strain were compared to LGE-CMR as reference method., Results: Reduced FDG metabolism (<70% relative) precisely identified transmural scars (≥50% of myocardial volume) in the LV lateral wall, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.00). Reduced contractile function by strain identified transmural scars in the LV lateral wall with only moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.77, CI 0.71-0.84). However, absolute peak systolic strain >10% could rule out transmural scar with high sensitivity (80%) and high negative predictive value (96%). Neither FDG-PET nor strain identified septal scars (for both, AUC < 0.80)., Conclusions: In CRT candidates, FDG-PET is an excellent alternative to LGE-CMR to identify scar in the LV lateral wall. Furthermore, preserved strain in the LV lateral wall has good accuracy to rule out transmural scar. None of the modalities can identify septal scar., Clinical Trial Registration: The present study is part of the clinical study "Contractile Reserve in Dyssynchrony: A Novel Principle to Identify Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRID-CRT)", which was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02525185)., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate if contractile asymmetry between septum and left ventricular (LV) lateral wall drives heart failure development in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and whether the presence of lateral wall dysfunction affects potential for recovery of LV function with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)., Background: LBBB may induce or aggravate heart failure. Understanding the underlying mechanisms is important to optimize timing of CRT., Methods: In 76 nonischemic patients with LBBB and 11 controls, we measured strain using speckle-tracking echocardiography and regional work using pressure-strain analysis. Patients with LBBB were stratified according to LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥50% (EF preserved ), 36% to 49% (EF mid ), and ≤35% (EF low ). Sixty-four patients underwent CRT and were re-examined after 6 months., Results: Septal work was successively reduced from controls, through EF preserved , EF mid , and EF low (all p < 0.005), and showed a strong correlation to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; r = 0.84; p < 0.005). In contrast, LV lateral wall work was numerically increased in EF preserved and EF mid versus controls, and did not significantly correlate with LVEF in these groups. In EF low, however, LV lateral wall work was substantially reduced (p < 0.005). There was a moderate overall correlation between LV lateral wall work and LVEF (r = 0.58; p < 0.005). In CRT recipients, LVEF was normalized (≥50%) in 54% of patients with preserved LV lateral wall work, but only in 13% of patients with reduced LV lateral wall work (p < 0.005)., Conclusions: In early stages, LBBB-induced heart failure is associated with impaired septal function but preserved lateral wall function. The advent of LV lateral wall dysfunction may be an optimal time-point for CRT., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs Sletten and Aalen were supported by grants from the Norwegian Health Association. Dr Larsen was a recipient of a clinical research fellowships form the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority. Prof Voigt holds a personal research mandate of the Flemish Research Council. Prof Voigt and Dr Duchenne were further supported by a grant of the University of Leuven. Dr Smiseth is co-inventor, but since May 24, 2017 has had no financial relations to the patent “Method for myocardial segment work analysis,” which was used to calculate the myocardial work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose, (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Conflicting data exist about the relationship between cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and diastolic function. Aims of the study are to assess diastolic patterns in patients undergoing CRT according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and to evaluate the prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in CRT candidates. METHODS AND RESULTS: One-hundred ninety-three patients (age: 67 ± 11 years, QRS width: 167 ± 21 ms) were included in this multicentre prospective study. Mitral filling pattern, mitral tissue Doppler velocity, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and indexed left atrial volume were used to classify DD from grade I to III. CRT-response, defined as a reduction of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume > 15% at 6-month follow-up (FU), occurred in 132 (68%) patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of heart transplantation, LV assisted device implantation, or all-cause death during FU and occurred in 29 (15%) patients. CRT was associated with a degradation of DD in non-responders. At multivariable analysis corrected for clinical variables, QRS duration, mitral regurgitation, CRT-response and LV dyssynchrony, grade I DD was associated with a better outcome (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.96). Non-responders with grade II-III DD had the worse prognosis (HR 4.36, 95%CI: 2.10-9.06). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of DD in CRT candidates allows the prognostic stratification of patients, independently from CRT-response., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Myocardial external efficiency is the relation of mechanical energy generated by the left (or right) ventricle to the consumed chemical energy from aerobic metabolism. Efficiency can be calculated invasively, and, more importantly, noninvasively by using positron emission tomography, providing a single parameter by which to judge the adequacy of myocardial metabolism to generated mechanical output. This parameter has been found to be impaired in heart failure of myocardial or valvular etiology, and it changes in a characteristic manner with medical or interventional cardiac therapy. The authors discuss the concept, strengths, and limitations, known applications, and future perspectives of the use of myocardial efficiency., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate how LBBB and CRT modify RV free wall function by direct ventricular interaction., Background: Right ventricular (RV) function influences prognosis in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). There is, however, limited insight into how LBBB and CRT affect RV function., Methods: In 24 patients with LBBB with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, RV and left ventricular (LV) strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography was measured before and after CRT. Underlying mechanisms were studied in 16 anesthetized dogs with ultrasonic dimension crystals and micromanometers., Results: Patients with LBBB demonstrated distinct early systolic shortening in the RV free wall, which coincided with the typical abnormal early systolic septal shortening. In animals, this RV free wall contraction pattern resulted in reduced myocardial work as a large portion of the shortening occurred against low pressure during early systole, coinciding with abnormal leftward septal motion. RV systolic function was maintained by vigorous contraction in the late-activated LV lateral wall, which pushed the septum toward the RV. CRT reduced abnormal septal motion and increased RV free wall work because there was less inefficient shortening against low pressure., Conclusions: LBBB reduces workload on the RV free wall because of abnormal septal motion and delayed activation of the LV lateral wall. Restoring septal and LV function by CRT increases workload in RV free wall and may explain why patients with RV failure respond poorly to CRT. (Contractile Reserve in Dyssynchrony: A Novel Principle to Identify Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [CRID-CRT]; NCT02525185)., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate how regional left ventricular (LV) function modifies septal motion in left bundle branch block (LBBB)., Background: In LBBB, the interventricular septum often has marked pre-ejection shortening, followed by immediate relengthening (rebound stretch). This motion, often referred to as septal flash, is associated with positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)., Methods: In 10 anesthetized dogs, we induced LBBB by radiofrequency ablation and occluded the circumflex (CX) (n = 10) and left anterior descending (LAD) (n = 6) coronary arteries, respectively. Myocardial dimensions were measured by sonomicrometry and myocardial work by pressure-segment length analysis. In 40 heart failure patients with LBBB, including 20 with post-infarct scar and 20 with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial strain was measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography and myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis. Scar was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement., Results: During LBBB, each animal showed typical septal flash with pre-ejection shortening and rebound stretch, followed by reduced septal systolic shortening (p < 0.01). CX occlusion caused LV lateral wall dysfunction and abolished septal flash due to loss of rebound stretch (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, CX occlusion restored septal systolic shortening to a similar level as before induction of LBBB and substantially improved septal work (p < 0.001). LAD occlusion, however, accentuated septal flash by increasing rebound stretch (p < 0.05). Consistent with the experimental findings, septal flash was absent in patients with LV lateral wall scar due to lack of rebound stretch (p < 0.001), and septal systolic shortening and septal work far exceeded values in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.0001). Septal flash was present in most patients with anteroseptal scar., Conclusions: LV lateral wall dysfunction and scar abolished septal flash and markedly improved septal function in LBBB. Therefore, function and scar in the LV lateral wall should be taken into account when septal motion is used to evaluate dyssynchrony., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)