Search

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulant prophylaxis is frequently recommended but underutilized partly due to the absence of studies assessing bleeding risk., Objectives: To determine the rate of severe (hospitalized) bleeding from thromboprophylaxis in patients treated for MM and identify clinical risk factors for bleeding in this population., Methods: Using the MarketScan database, we analyzed 6656 patients treated for MM between 2013 and 2021. Concomitant thromboprophylaxis was defined using prescription claims. Hospitalized bleeding was identified through the Cunningham algorithm. Bleeding rates were compared by thromboprophylaxis status, and Cox regression identified risk factors for bleeding., Results: Anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis was used in 6.6% (436) patients treated for MM. Patients on thromboprophylaxis had a higher rate of immunomodulatory-based therapy (63.8% vs 46.7%; P  < .01) and lower rate of antiplatelet use (2.1% vs 4.7%; P  < .01). Bleeding occurred in 1.4% of them during median follow-up of 1.3 years. Rate of severe bleeding was not different between those on prophylaxis (7.8 per 1000 person-years) and those not on prophylaxis (10.1 per 1000 person-years). No association was identified between thromboprophylaxis and bleeding. Factors associated with increased bleeding included age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38 per 10 years increase in age), comorbidity index (HR, 1.18 per SD increase), history of bleeding (HR, 1.54), hypertension (HR, 1.87), and renal disease (HR, 1.56)., Conclusion: Risk of serious bleeding from thromboprophylaxis in patients treated for MM was low, and concomitant anticoagulant therapy did not result in increased bleeding risk. Clinical risk factors for bleeding included age, comorbidity index, bleeding history, hypertension, and renal disease., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Thromboprophylaxis is thoroughly studied in MM. Contrarily, studies assessing the risk of bleeding in people with MM on anticoagulation are lacking., Objectives: To determine the rate of serious bleeding in patients with MM receiving anticoagulation for VTE and the clinical factors associated with bleeding risk., Methods: Using the MarketScan commercial database, we identified 1298 people with MM treated with anticoagulation for incident VTE events between 2011 and 2019. Hospitalized bleeding was identified using the Cunningham algorithm. Rates of bleeding were calculated and Cox regression identified risk factors for bleeding., Results: Bleeding occurred in 51 (3.9%) cases during median follow-up of 1.13 years. Rate of bleeding among patients with MM on anticoagulation was 24.0 per 1000 person-years. In adjusted regression, factors associated with increased bleeding included age (HR, 1.31 per 10-year increase; 95% CI, 1.03-1.65), Charlson comorbidity index (HR, 1.29 per SD increase; 95% CI, 1.02-1.58), use of antiplatelet agents (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.03-5.68), diabetes (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.06-3.26), and renal disease (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.05-3.16). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was 4.7%, 3.2%, and 3.4% for warfarin, low molecular weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants, respectively., Conclusion: In this real-world analysis, the rate of bleeding in people with MM on anticoagulation was comparable to those in other subsets of cancer-related VTE. Bleeding rate was lower with low molecular weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants than warfarin. Higher comorbidity index, diabetes, antiplatelet agent use, and renal disease were risk factors for serious bleeding., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Clonal hematopoiesis, a precursor to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), constitutes a novel cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, causing growing interest in cardiovascular outcomes in MDS. Rurality is associated with increased CVD but studies on cardiovascular geographic disparities in MDS are lacking., Methods: Using the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, we identified 52,750 MDS patients between 2001 and 2016. Rurality was defined using Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Cox regression estimated the association of rurality and cardiovascular death., Results: MDS incidence was equal in urban and rural populations (6.7 per 100,000). Crude probability of cardiovascular death was higher among rural MDS patients. Adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, insurance, and MDS risk (defined from histology), rural patients had 12% increased risk of CVD death compared to urban patients (HR=1.12, 95%CI 1.03-1.21). HR for CVD death was 1.22 (95%CI 1.01-1.5) in patients from the most rural areas (less than 2500 urban population). Among MDS patients younger than 65 years, rurality was associated with 25% increased risk of CVD death (HR=1.25, 95%CI 1.01-1.59)., Discussion: This population-based analysis suggests that rural residence is linked to higher burden of cardiovascular death in patients with MDS. The disparity is not explained by demographic factors or MDS risk. Interventions targeting CVD may improve outcomes in rural MDS patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In the United States, autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) has fallen out of favor over chemotherapy consolidation for non-high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) when allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is unfeasible, which is common in racial minorities because of donor registry under-representation and socioeconomic challenges. We compared autoHCT consolidation outcomes with chemotherapy alone in a minority-rich cohort in the Bronx., Patients and Methods: We identified adults with favorable or intermediate cytogenetic risk AML in first complete remission after induction at Montefiore Medical Center from 1999 to 2015, and analyzed 81 patients who received consolidation with ≥2 cycles of chemotherapy, of whom 28 received autoHCT., Results: The cohort predominantly consisted of ethnic/racial minorities (69%). Age, sex, race, presenting white cell count, and cytogenetic risk were similar between groups. The autoHCT group had longer relapse-free (RFS; 43 vs. 11 months; P = .003) and overall (OS) survival (not reached vs. 36 months; P = .043). Adjusted multivariable analysis showed significant benefit of autoHCT over chemotherapy alone for RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.75; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95; P = .027)., Conclusion: In this inner-city non-high-risk AML cohort, autoHCT provided OS and RFS benefit compared with chemotherapy alone. AutoHCT might constitute a valuable option for ethnic/racial minorities affected by significant barriers to alloHCT, whereas integration of measurable residual disease can help select patients more likely to benefit., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)