Search

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were largely excluded from the major clinical trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), despite the presence of AF in up to 40% of patients receiving CRT in clinical practice. AF appears to attenuate the response to CRT, by the combination of a reduction in biventricular pacing and the loss of atrioventricular synchrony. In addition, remodeling secondary to CRT may influence the progression of AF. Management options for patients with AF and CRT include rate control, with drugs or atrioventricular node ablation, or rhythm control, with electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic therapy, or AF catheter ablation. The evidence for these therapies in patients with CRT is largely limited to observational studies or inferred from randomized studies in the general heart failure population. In this review, we explore the complex interaction between AF, heart failure, and CRT and discuss the evidence for the treatment options in this difficult patient cohort.

In light of recent reports showing high incidence of silent cerebral infarcts and organized atrial arrhythmias following radiofrequency (RF) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, a review of its safety aspects is timely. Serious complications do occur during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) ablations and knowledge of their incidence is important when deciding whether to proceed with ablation. Evidence is emerging for the probable role of prophylactic ischemic scar ablation to prevent VT. This might increase the number of procedures performed. Here we look at the various complications of RF ablation and also the methods to minimize them. Electronic database was searched for relevant articles from 1990 to 2015. With better awareness and technological advancements in RF ablation the incidence of complications has improved considerably. In AF ablation it has decreased from 6% to less than 4% comprising of vascular complications, cardiac tamponade, stroke, phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) and death. Safety of SVT ablation has also improved with less than 1% incidence of AV node injury in AVNRT ablation. In VT ablation the incidence of major complications was 5–11%, up to 3.4%, up to 1.8% and 4.1–8.8% in patients with structural heart disease, without structural heart disease, prophylactic ablations and epicardial ablations respectively. Vascular and pericardial complications dominated endocardial and epicardial VT ablations respectively. Up to 3% mortality and similar rates of tamponade were reported in endocardial VT ablation. Recent reports about the high incidence of asymptomatic cerebral embolism during AF ablation are concerning, warranting more research into its etiology and prevention.

Background: in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), AF ablation improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), along with prognosis, in a variable percentage of patients. We aimed to investigate the predictors of LVEF recovery after AF ablation and to develop a prediction model for individualized assessment., Methods: we conducted an observational, retrospective, single-centre study on 111 consecutive patients with AF and HF with impaired LVEF (<50%) undergoing ablation. Patients were divided into Responder vs. Non-Responder according to the "Universal definition of HF". Clinical predictors were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and cross-validation technique. Independent predictors were used to build an internally validated prediction model., Results: Responders (54%) had significantly shorter QRS duration and less dilated left atrium. Persistent AF and absence of a known etiology were more frequent among Responders. AF recurrence was similar between the two groups (p = 0.2), but the percentage of patient with persistent AF after ablation was significantly lower among Responders (p < 0.001). Absence of known etiology, presence of persistent AF, left atrial volume index<50 mL/m 2 , and QRS < 120 msec were independent predictors of LVEF recovery and composed the Score (AUC 0.93;95%CI 0.88-0.98-p < 0.001). Patients with Score ≤ 1 had 90% likelihood of LVEF recovery, compared to 5% in patients with 3-6., Conclusions: Patients with wide QRS, known HF etiology, dilated left atrium, and paroxysmal AF were less likely to recover LVEF after AF ablation. A new score system based on the above-mentioned parameters adequately predicts LVEF recovery after AF ablation. These results warrant confirmation and prospective validation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Damage to extracardiac structures, including the esophagus and phrenic nerve, is a known complication of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Other adjacent structures, including the pulmonary bronchi and lung parenchyma, may be affected during CBA at the PV ostia., Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively study the bronchial effects of CBA in humans undergoing CBA for PV isolation., Methods: Ten patients undergoing CBA for AF under general anesthesia were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective observational study. Real-time bronchoscopy was performed during cryoablation of PVs adjacent to pulmonary bronchi to monitor for thermal injury. Patients were followed for the development of respiratory complaints postprocedure., Results: In 7 of 10 patients (70%) and in 13 of 22 freezes (59%), ice formation was visualized in the left mainstem bronchus during CBA in the left upper PV. Ice formation was not seen in the right mainstem bronchus during right upper PV CBA. The average time to ice formation was 89 seconds. There was no significant difference (P = -.45) in average minimum balloon temperature during freezes with ice formation (-48.5°C) and freezes without ice formation (-46.3°C). No patients went on to develop respiratory complications., Conclusion: Unrecognized ice formation occurs frequently in the left mainstem bronchus during CBA for AF. This information helps explain the source of cough and hemoptysis in some patients who undergo CBA. The long-term consequences of this novel finding and the implications for procedural safety are unknown., (Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with left ventricular diastolic impairment (LVDI) have higher rates of arrhythmia recurrence following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Past studies have implicated the posterior left atrium (LA) in atrial arrhythmia maintenance in conditions that cause LVDI. We prospectively compared posterior LA isolation (PLAI) with wide antral isolation (WAI) in patients with LVDI having AF ablation., Methods: We conducted a sub-study of a previously published large randomized control study that compared PLAI with WAI. Two hundred and twenty consecutive consenting patients referred for catheter ablation of AF (paroxysmal 135, persistent 48, long standing persistent 37) were recruited (female 43, mean age 59 ± 10 years). Transthoracic echocardiography identified 50 (23%) patients with LVDI and preserved left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction ≥ 50%). Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify independent predictors of atrial arrhythmia after ablation., Results: Patients were followed for median 4.6 (inter quartile range 4.0-5.5) years. Patients with LVDI having PLAI had better arrhythmia free survival than patients randomized to conventional ablation (Log rank P=0.028). The only independent predictor of recurrence utilizing Cox regression analysis was ablation strategy (2.3 [1.15-4.74], P=0.026)., Conclusion: Posterior isolation of the LA results in superior atrial arrhythmia free survival in patients with LVDI. Further investigation is required to determine potential mechanisms., Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.anzctr.org.au;ACTRN12606000467538., (Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)