Search

Objective: The present study compares postoperative outcomes between patients with and without sickle cell disease (SCD) undergoing 1-to 3-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies., Methods: Patients who underwent 1-to 3-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies from 2010 to 2021 were identified using the PearlDiver database. Patients were separated into 1) SCD and 2) non-SCD groups and were propensity-matched 1:1 for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, surgical approach, and various comorbidities. Complications were separately analyzed by single- and multilevel procedures using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U testing., Results: Propensity-score matching identified 1934 SCD and non-SCD patients who underwent single-level fusion and 2094 SCD and non-SCD patients who underwent multilevel fusion. Across single-level fusions, those with SCD had a significantly higher risk of neurovascular compromise (P < 0.001), venous thromboembolism (P = 0.004), pneumonia (P = 0.032), urinary tract infections (P = 0.001), and greater postoperative opioid usage out to 12 months (P = 0.018). Across multilevel fusions, SCD carried higher risk for neurovascular compromise (P < 0.001), pneumonia (P = 0.010), and urinary tract infections (P < 0.001). All SCD patients had significantly higher opioid use at 1 month (P = 0.001) and at 6 months (P = 0.009) postoperatively., Conclusions: Patients with SCD undergoing lumbar spinal fusion demonstrate higher risks for coagulopathic, ischemic, and infectious-related complications, as well as long-term postoperative opioid use. Awareness of the unique complication profile in SCD patients may help guide surgeons in refining perioperative management strategies to optimize outcomes in patients with SCD., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Risk assessment is critically important in elective and high-risk interventions, particularly spine surgery. This narrative review describes the evolution of risk assessment from the earliest instruments focused on general surgical risk stratification, to more accurate and spine-specific risk calculators that quantified risk, to the current era of big data., Methods: The PubMed and SCOPUS databases were queried on October 11, 2023 using search terms to identify risk assessment tools (RATs) in spine surgery. A total of 108 manuscripts were included after screening with full-text review using the following inclusion criteria: 1) study population of adult spine surgical patients, 2) studies describing validation and subsequent performance of preoperative RATs, and 3) studies published in English., Results: Early RATs provided stratified patients into broad categories and allowed for improved communication between physicians. Subsequent risk calculators attempted to quantify risk by estimating general outcomes such as mortality, but then evolved to estimate spine-specific surgical complications. The integration of novel concepts such as invasiveness, frailty, genetic biomarkers, and sarcopenia led to the development of more sophisticated predictive models that estimate the risk of spine-specific complications and long-term outcomes., Conclusions: RATs have undergone a transformative shift from generalized risk stratification to quantitative predictive models. The next generation of tools will likely involve integration of radiographic and genetic biomarkers, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy of these models and better inform patients, surgeons, and payers., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We evaluated the contributions of chronological age, comorbidity burden, and/or frailty in predicting 90-day readmission in patients undergoing degenerative scoliosis surgery., Methods: Patients were identified through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database. Frailty was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining indicator. Comorbidity was assessed using the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Generalized linear mixed-effects models were created to predict readmission using age, frailty, and/or ECI. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared using DeLong's test., Results: A total of 8104 patients were identified. Readmission rate was 9.8%, with infection representing the most common cause (3.5%). Our first model utilized chronological age, ECI, and/or frailty as primary predictors. The combination of ECI + frailty + age performed best, but the inclusion of chronological age did not significantly improve performance compared to ECI + frailty alone (AUC 0.603 vs. 0.599, P = 0.290). A second model using only chronological age and frailty as primary predictors performed better, however the inclusion of chronological age worsened performance when compared to frailty alone (AUC 0.747 vs. 0.743, P = 0.043)., Conclusions: These data support frailty as a predictor of 90-day readmission within a nationally representative sample. Frailty alone performed better than combinations of ECI and age. Interestingly, the integration of chronological age did not dramatically improve the model's performance. Limitations include the use of a national registry and a single frailty index. This provides impetus to explore biological age, rather than chronological age, as a potential tool for surgical risk assessment., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In recent years, the use of intraoperative computer tomography-guided (CT-guided) navigation has gained significant popularity among health care providers who perform minimally invasive spine surgery. This review aims to identify and analyze trends in the literature related to the widespread adoption of CT-guided navigation in spine surgery, emphasizing the shift from conventional fluoroscopy-based techniques to CT-guided navigation., Methods: Articles pertaining to this study were identified via a database review and were hierarchically organized based on the number of citations. An "advanced document search" was performed on September 28th, 2022, utilizing Boolean search operator terms. The 25 most referenced articles were combined into a primary list after sorting results in descending order based on the total number of citations., Results: The "Top 25" list for intraoperative CT-guided navigation in spine surgery cumulatively received a total of 2742 citations, with an average of 12 new citations annually. The number of citations ranged from 246 for the most cited article to 60 for the 25th most cited article. The most cited article was a paper by Siewerdsen et al., with 246 total citations, averaging 15 new citations per year., Conclusions: Intraoperative CT-guided navigation is 1 of many technological advances that is used to increase surgical accuracy, and it has become an increasingly popular alternative to conventional fluoroscopy-based techniques. Given the increasing adoption of intraoperative CT-guided navigation in spine surgery, this review provides impactful evidence for its utility in spine surgery., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previously reported estimates of vertebral artery injuries (VAIs) during cervical spine surgery relied on self-reported survey studies and retrospective cohorts, which may not be reflective of national averages. The largest study to date reports an incidence of 0.07%; however, significant variation exists between different cervical spine procedures. This study aimed to identify the incidence of VAIs in patients undergoing cervical spine procedures for degenerative pathologies., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, a national insurance database was used to access data from the period 2010-2020 of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, anterior corpectomy, posterior cervical fusion (C3-C7), or C1-C2 posterior fusion for degenerative pathologies. Patients who experienced a VAI were identified, and frequencies for the different procedures were compared., Results: This study included 224,326 patients, and overall incidence of VAIs across all procedures was 0.03%. The highest incidence of VAIs was estimated in C1-C2 posterior fusion (0.12%-1.10%). The number of patients with VAIs after anterior corpectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and posterior fusion was 14 (0.06%), 43 (0.02%), and 26 (0.01%), respectively., Conclusions: This is the largest study to date to our knowledge that provides frequencies of VAIs in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery in the United States. The overall incidence of 0.03% is lower than previously reported estimates, but significant variability exists between procedures, which is an important consideration when counseling patients about risks of surgery., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Studies have reported the detrimental effects of depression following spine surgery; however, none have evaluated whether preoperative depression screening in patients with a history of depression is protective from adverse outcomes and lowers health care costs. We studied whether depression screenings/psychotherapy visits within 3 months before 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion were associated with lower medical complications, emergency department utilization, readmissions, and health care costs., Methods: The PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2020 was queried for depressive disorder (DD) patients undergoing primary 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion. Two cohorts were 1:5 ratio matched and included DD patients with (n = 2,622) and DD patients without (n = 13,058) a preoperative depression screen/psychotherapy visit within 3 months of lumbar fusion. A 90-day surveillance period was used to compare outcomes. Logistic regression models computed odds ratio (OR) of complications and readmissions. P value < 0.003 was significant., Results: DD patients without depression screening had significantly greater incidence and odds of experiencing medical complications (40.57% vs. 16.00%; OR 2.71, P < 0.0001). Rates of emergency department utilization were increased in patients without screening versus screening (15.78% vs. 4.23%; OR 4.25, P < 0.0001), despite no difference in readmissions (9.31% vs. 9.53%; OR 0.97, P = 0.721). Finally, 90-day reimbursements ($51,160 vs. $54,731) were significantly lower in the screened cohort (all P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Patients who underwent a preoperative depression screening within 3 months of lumbar fusion had decreased medical complications, emergency department utilization, and health care costs. Spine surgeons may use these data to counsel their patients with depression before surgical intervention., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Arthroplasty surgeons use the change in sacral slope (ΔSS) from sitting to standing as a measure of spinal motion. The relationship between ΔSS and the change in lumbar lordosis (ΔLL), an established spinal motion measure, has not been well studied. This study aims to determine the correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL., Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to a spine clinic from 2020 to 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively studied. Standing and sitting lateral radiographs were measured for SS and LL. Patients were divided using ΔSS and ΔLL into stiff (0°-9°), normal (10°-30°), or hypermobile (>30°) category. Patients with a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but a ΔLL-determined stiff spine were compared to the rest of the cohort., Results: Overall, 100 patients were included. Of these patients, 47% had the same classification when looking at ΔSS and ΔLL, whereas 53% had conflicting classifications. Twenty percent of patients had a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but ΔLL-determined stiff spine. The correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL was 0.510 ( P < .001). When isolating patients who underwent lumbar fusion, the correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL was 0.345 ( P < .001)., Conclusions: ΔSS has a moderate correlation with ΔLL in patients presenting for evaluation of their lumbar spine but low correlation in patients with lumbar fusion. In our cohort, 20% of patients had a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but a ΔLL-determined stiff spine, representing a potential high-risk dislocation cohort not captured by ΔSS alone. Arthroplasty surgeons should revisit classifying spinal motion based solely on ΔSS., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a well-recognized complication following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD); however, definitions for PJK and its clinical implications can significantly vary by study. This study compares multiple definitions of PJK and describes incidence and clinical significance by definition., Methods: From 2014 to 2019, patients with ASD who underwent spinal fusion were identified. Nine definitions of PJK were created based on previously established definitions using the following upper instrumented vertebra +2 (UIV+2) sagittal Cobb measurements: A= ≥10 postoperative AND preoperative, B = ≥10 postoperative, C = ≥10 preoperative, D = ≥15 postoperative AND preoperative, E = ≥15 postoperative, F = ≥15 preoperative, G = ≥20 postoperative AND preoperative, H = ≥20 postoperative, I = >20 preoperative. Incidence of PJK was calculated by definition. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated based on a receiver operating characteristic to assess ability to predict proximal junctional failure (PJF). Univariate analysis was performed to assess association with postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores., Results: Across 82 patients, the incidence of PJK and AUC by definition was as follows: A = 47%, 0.47; B = 72%, 0.65; C = 49%, 0.45; D = 27%, 0.46; E = 57%, 0.62; F = 27%, 0.46; G = 10%, 0.55; H = 40%, 0.71; I = 10%, 0.55. No definition was associated with postoperative ODI scores (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The incidence of PJK significantly decreased with stricter definitions. Definitions utilizing only postoperative UIV+2 values had higher incidences but were more likely to capture patients who developed PJF. No definition was associated with postoperative ODI scores. UIV+2 ≥20 was best in distinguishing patients who developed PJF., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: There are few published studies that investigate the surgical treatment of supination-adduction (SAD, AO/OTA 44A2.3) ankle fractures. The purpose of this study was to describe the complications and outcomes following operative fixation of SAD type 2 ankle fractures., Materials and Methods: We identified all SAD-2 ankle fractures that presented at our institution's two hospitals from 2006-2018. Demographics, operative data, and complications (deep infection, superficial infection, delayed union, failure of fixation, and unplanned reoperation) were recorded for all patients. Lastly, all included patients were contacted by telephone for the administration of an 8-question Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference questionnaire (PI). Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complication or poor functional outcome score., Results: 65 patients met inclusion criteria. The average time to surgery was 14 days and average follow-up was 20.5 (range: 0.4-60.9) weeks. There were 9 (13.8%) complications (4 deep infections, 3 superficial infections, 1 delayed union, 1 failure of fixation) and 6 unplanned reoperations. Univariate and multivariate analysis failed to identify any statistically significant risk factors for complication or reoperation. Eleven patients participated in the administration of PROMIS score questionnaires at a mean of 3.4 years postoperatively. The average PROMIS Physical Function T-score was 42.3 ± 11.3 and the average PROMIS Pain Interference T-score was 55.8 ± 7.8. Younger age was associated with a higher physical function score. The use of a direct medial approach to the medial malleolus was associated with a lower pain interference score., Conclusion: The overall complication rate for SAD (OTA/AO 44A2.3) type 2 ankle fractures is similar to that of the general ankle fracture population. We were unable to identify risk factors for complication or reoperation. Mean patient reported outcomes are within one standard deviation of the general population., Level of Evidence: III, retrospective cohort study., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Geoffrey Marecek is a consultant for Smith & Nephew, receives research support from BoneSupport AB, consulting fees from Globus Medical, DePuy Synthes, Nuvasive, Stryker and Zimmer Biomet, and he is a committee member for the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Western Orthopaedic Association. Dr. Ram Alluri has stock ownership in Stryker, ZimmerBiomet, Medtronic, Axogen. He has received grant funding from Arthrex, Trimmed, Accumed, American Foundation for Surgery of the Hand, and the Broad Foundation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe a novel construct for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis using headless cannulated screws as an intramedullary washer to augment 90/90 intraosseous wiring and compare the biomechanical properties of this construct with those of the 90/90 intraosseous wiring without headless screw augmentation., Methods: Biomechanical evaluation of augmented 90/90 intraosseous wiring with headless cannulated screws (group 1) or 90/90 intraosseous wiring without augmentation (group 2) for PIP joint arthrodesis was performed in 3 matched-pair cadaveric specimens (12 digits per group). Each group was loaded to 10 N in the sagittal and coronal planes and the resultant stiffness from the load-displacement curve was calculated. In extension, each group then underwent load to permanent deformation and load to catastrophic failure., Results: The augmented 90/90 intraosseous wiring with cannulated screws construct demonstrated significantly greater stiffness by 132%, 64%, 79%, and 75% in flexion, extension, ulnar, and radial displacement, respectively. During load to permanent deformation testing, a 42% greater force was required to create permanent deformation in group 1 compared than group 2. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups during load to catastrophic failure testing., Conclusions: Augmenting 90/90 intraosseous wiring for PIP joint arthrodesis with 2 headless cannulated screws in the sagittal plane that serve as intramedullary washers for the sagittal wire and posts for the coronal wire significantly increases stiffness in all directions as well as load to permanent deformation compared with 90/90 intraosseous wiring without cannulated screw augmentation., Clinical Relevance: Augmentation of the 90/90 intraosseous wire construct with headless cannulated screws can be considered in patients at risk for wire cutout or implant failure., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the biomechanical properties of second versus third metacarpal distal fixation when using a radiocarpal spanning distraction plate in an unstable distal radius fracture model., Methods: Biomechanical evaluation of the radiocarpal spanning distraction plate comparing second versus third metacarpal distal fixation was performed using a standardized model of an unstable wrist fracture in 10 matched-pair cadaveric specimens. Each fixation construct underwent a controlled cyclic loading protocol in flexion and extension. The resultant displacement and stiffness were calculated at the fracture site. After cyclic loading, each specimen was loaded to failure. The stiffness, maximum displacement, and load to failure were compared between the 2 groups., Results: Cyclic loading in flexion demonstrated that distal fixation to the third metacarpal resulted in greater stiffness compared with the second metacarpal. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regards to maximum displacement at the fracture site in flexion. Cyclic loading in extension demonstrated no significant difference in stiffness or maximum displacement between the 2 groups. The average load to failure was similar for both groups., Conclusions: Fixation to the third metacarpal resulted in greater stiffness in flexion. All other biomechanical parameters were similar when comparing distal fixation to the second or third metacarpal in distal radius fractures stabilized with a spanning internal distraction plate., Clinical Relevance: The treating surgeon should choose distal metacarpal fixation primarily based on fracture pattern, alignment, and soft tissue integrity. If a stiffer construct is desired, placement of the radiocarpal spanning plate at the third metacarpal is preferred., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Distal radius fractures remain among the most common fractures of the upper extremity. The indications for operative management continue to evolve based on outcomes from the most recent clinical studies. Advancements over the past decade have expanded the variety of fixation options available; however, the clinical superiority of a particular treatment modality remains without consensus. Each approach requires the use of unique surgical techniques, and the choice of a particular implant system should be based on the surgeon's familiarity with the implant design and its limitations. As our understanding of the management of distal radius fractures improves, so will our indications for each specific treatment modality., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)