Search

Inquilinus limosus is an uncommon, poorly understood bacterium capable of infecting the respiratory tracts of people with cystic fibrosis. The transmission, clinical relevance and changes in antimicrobial resistance of I. limosus over time are unclear due to the low frequency of identification. We report three co-habiting brothers with cystic fibrosis who developed chronic I. limosus infection and document the clinical and microbiological features of the infections. Clinical evolution after Inquilinus infection varied but was associated with an initial decline in lung function. Familial clustering of this rare pathogen raises the possibility of cross-infection as a potential mechanism of transmission of Inquilinus between CF patients.

Background: A previous efficacy trial found benefit from inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in patients not admitted to hospital, but effectiveness in high-risk individuals is unknown. We aimed to establish whether inhaled budesonide reduces time to recovery and COVID-19-related hospital admissions or deaths among people at high risk of complications in the community., Methods: PRINCIPLE is a multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial done remotely from a central trial site and at primary care centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 65 years or older or 50 years or older with comorbidities, and unwell for up to 14 days with suspected COVID-19 but not admitted to hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to usual care, usual care plus inhaled budesonide (800 μg twice daily for 14 days), or usual care plus other interventions, and followed up for 28 days. Participants were aware of group assignment. The coprimary endpoints are time to first self-reported recovery and hospital admission or death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. The primary analysis population included all eligible SARS-CoV-2-positive participants randomly assigned to budesonide, usual care, and other interventions, from the start of the platform trial until the budesonide group was closed. This trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN86534580) and is ongoing., Findings: The trial began enrolment on April 2, 2020, with randomisation to budesonide from Nov 27, 2020, until March 31, 2021, when the prespecified time to recovery superiority criterion was met. 4700 participants were randomly assigned to budesonide (n=1073), usual care alone (n=1988), or other treatments (n=1639). The primary analysis model includes 2530 SARS-CoV-2-positive participants, with 787 in the budesonide group, 1069 in the usual care group, and 974 receiving other treatments. There was a benefit in time to first self-reported recovery of an estimated 2·94 days (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI] 1·19 to 5·12) in the budesonide group versus the usual care group (11·8 days [95% BCI 10·0 to 14·1] vs 14·7 days [12·3 to 18·0]; hazard ratio 1·21 [95% BCI 1·08 to 1·36]), with a probability of superiority greater than 0·999, meeting the prespecified superiority threshold of 0·99. For the hospital admission or death outcome, the estimated rate was 6·8% (95% BCI 4·1 to 10·2) in the budesonide group versus 8·8% (5·5 to 12·7) in the usual care group (estimated absolute difference 2·0% [95% BCI -0·2 to 4·5]; odds ratio 0·75 [95% BCI 0·55 to 1·03]), with a probability of superiority 0·963, below the prespecified superiority threshold of 0·975. Two participants in the budesonide group and four in the usual care group had serious adverse events (hospital admissions unrelated to COVID-19)., Interpretation: Inhaled budesonide improves time to recovery, with a chance of also reducing hospital admissions or deaths (although our results did not meet the superiority threshold), in people with COVID-19 in the community who are at higher risk of complications., Funding: National Institute of Health Research and United Kingdom Research Innovation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MB reports grants from AstraZeneca, personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and GlaxoSmithKline; and is a member of advisory boards for Albus Health and ProAxsis, outside the submitted work. DR reports being a former employee of GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. BRS, NB, MAD, MF, and CS report grants from The University of Oxford, for the University of Oxford's grant from the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and for statistical design and analyses for the PRINCIPLE trial during the conduct of the study. SdL is Director of the Oxford–Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre and reports that through his university he has had grants outside the submitted work from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Seqirus, and Takeda for vaccine-related research, and membership of advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Seqirus. MIA reports grants and personal fees from Prenetics outside the submitted work. PJB reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from Teva and Covis, during the conduct of the study. REKR reports grants from AstraZeneca and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi UK, and GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study. SR reports grants and non-financial support from Oxford respiratory NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), during the conduct of the study; and non-financial support from AstraZeneca and personal fees from the Australian Government Research Training Program, outside the submitted work. FDRH and CCB report grants from UK Research and Innovation, during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)