Search

Leukapheresis is a resource-intensive and high-risk treatment with unclear benefits when used for leukostasis syndrome in hematologic malignancies. In this case report and literature review we discuss the pathophysiology of leukostasis syndrome associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and the rapidly evolving paradigm of CLL treatment through the lens of a 51-year-old man who was diagnosed with CLL. He presented with clinical manifestations of leukostasis syndrome with an absolute lymphocyte count of 522.6×109/L. We identified 15 additional cases of CLL-associated leukostasis syndrome in our literature review. Pulmonary and neurologic manifestations of leukostasis were most common. In combination with pharmacologic cytoreduction, leukapheresis was used successfully in most cases with few reports of complications. In the context of greater adoption of first line therapies for CLL that are known to induce transient leukocytosis, we explore leukapheresis as an adjunctive therapy that can rapidly reduce the lymphocyte count and in select instances possibly mitigate the effects of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hyperleukocytosis.

Zanubrutinib is an orally administered second-generation covalent inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase that was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic leukemia. It has been associated with significant major and minor bleeding events, including intracranial and GI hemorrhage and hematuria, with or without concurrent antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. We report a case of a 65-year-old man with relapsing chronic lymphocytic leukemia. He presented to us with repeated episodes of worsening dyspnea secondary to hemorrhagic pleural effusion 2 months after the initiation of zanubrutinib with concomitant apixaban use. On discontinuation of zanubrutinib after the second episode, he remained asymptomatic on further follow-up examination. Previously only described with the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, our case focuses attention on a rare adverse event and a first reported incidence, to our knowledge, of recurrent hemorrhagic pleural effusion associated with zanubrutinib in a patient with relapsing chronic lymphocytic leukemia., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is a distal, predominantly demyelinating, sensory or sensory-motor polyneuropathy most often developing in the context of an IgM-type monoclonal gammopathy due to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Rituximab is considered standard therapy for treatment naïve patients, but optimal treatment methods for relapsed/refractory patients have not been established. Case presentation: We demonstrate that tirabrutinib, a second-generation Burton kinase inhibitor, led to drastic improvements of polyneuropathy that were affirmed by nerve conduction studies in a rituximab-refractory anti-MAG neuropathy patient. Tirabrutinib continues to give excellent disease control with no apparent adverse events at 11 months since initiation, and the patient remains free of plasmapheresis sessions which were originally mandatory. Conclusion: Tirabrutinib is an extremely promising treatment option for anti-MAG neuropathy.

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has been validated as an effective drug to treat B cell malignancies. Combined therapies comprising ibrutinib and anti-CD20 antibodies like rituximab were designed as a backbone in many clinical trials. However, the off-target inhibition of ibrutinib on interleukin-2 (IL-2)-inducible T cell kinase (ITK) may reduce rituximab’s antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) efficacy. Orelabrutinib (Orel), a novel BTK inhibitor, was designed with high selectivity to BTK. In our study, we demonstrated in preclinical models that orelabrutinib in combination with rituximab could preserve NK-cell-mediated ADCC induced by rituximab and enhanced the apoptosis of tumor cells in vitro. The addition of orelabrutinib to rituximab had produced promising combined anti-tumor effects in B cell lymphomas in vivo. Collectively, combination therapy of orelabrutinib with rituximab would benefit patients with B cell lymphoma, especially those with relapsed or refractory disease.

Introduction: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that delivers monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to CD30+ cells and is safe and effective in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Although most patients respond to BV, only a minority will obtain a complete response (CR), and almost all patients eventually progress. Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor highly active in multiple subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma; limited data exist regarding its use in HL. It irreversibly inhibits interleukin-2-inducible kinase (ITK) with Th1 based immune responses. As we previously observed preclinical synergy between ibrutinib and BV, we hypothesized ibrutinib may enhance the antitumor activity of BV in HL. We designed and conducted a phase II trial of ibrutinib plus BV in patients with R/R HL, and herein report the final primary analysis of safety and efficacy., Methods: This was a multicenter phase II trial with a lead-in cohort in patients with r/r HL. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 15 years with r/r HL after at least one prior line of therapy. Treatment consisted of 1.8 mg/kg BV intravenously every 3 weeks and ibrutinib 560 mg PO daily (420 mg PO daily in the lead-in cohort). Prior BV was allowed if patients were not refractory. The primary endpoint was the CR rate according to Lugano 2014. Secondary endpoints included toxicities, overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR)., Results: The 39 patients were enrolled onto the study, of which 67% were male; the median age was 33 (range: 17-71). 38% had extranodal disease at baseline, 51% had advanced stage disease, 51% were refractory to the prior therapy, and 21% had prior BV. Of 36 patients who were evaluable for response, the CR rate was 33% and ORR 64%; median DOR was 25.5 months. Thirteen patients proceeded to autologous transplant and 3 patients proceeded to allogeneic transplant for consolidation after response. The most common adverse events were nausea (67%), peripheral neuropathy (62%), diarrhea (59%), fatigue (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (41%), rash (41%), elevated ALT (38%), anemia (36%), vomiting (36%), abdominal pain (33%), fever (33%), and hypertension (33%). Six patients experienced unacceptable toxicity, defined as Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity or non-resolving Gr 3/4 hematologic toxicity including one patient who died of multiorgan failure from suspected COVID-19 infection during cycle 1., Discussion: The combination of BV and ibrutinib was active in r/r HL; however, given significant toxicity, it cannot be recommended for future development., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) are among the most widely used therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and established a new expectation for efficacy and safety in the treatment of this disease. Currently there are 3 covalent inhibitors of BTK approved for the treatment of CLL: ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib. The first-in-class covalent BTK inhibitor is ibrutinib, which as monotherapy has excellent efficacy in the front-line setting with a 7-year progression free survival (PFS) of 59%. Ibrutinib-based therapies have also demonstrated superiority over standard chemoimmunotherapy in the front-line and the relapsed/refractory setting. Acalabrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor that has higher selectivity to BTK. Acalabrutinib has efficacy in both frontline and relapsed CLL and is associated with a decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation and hypertension when compared to ibrutinib. Like acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib was designed to be more selective for BTK than ibrutinib and to maximize BTK inhibition in tissues. Zanubrutinib has demonstrated clinical efficacy in first line and relapsed/refractory setting. These agents are indicated as monotherapy, with dosing until disease progression or intolerable toxicity, and are mainly differentiated by safety profile, although efficacy differences may exist as well. Combination with CD20 monoclonal antibodies and/or BCL2 inhibitors are alternative options for use. Here we will review efficacy and safety considerations with these agents., Competing Interests: Disclosure JAW: Consulting: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Genentech, Janssen, Loxo/Lilly, Merck, Newave, Pharmacyclics. The other authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Over the past decades, significant strides have been made in understanding the pathobiology, prognosis, and treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The heterogeneity observed in MCL's biology, genomics, and clinical manifestations, including indolent and aggressive forms, is intricately linked to factors such as the mutational status of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, epigenetic profiling, and Sox11 expression. Several intriguing subtypes of MCL, such as Cyclin D1-negative MCL, in situ mantle cell neoplasm, CCND1/IGH FISH-negative MCL, and the impact of karyotypic complexity on prognosis, have been explored. Notably, recent immunochemotherapy regimens have yielded long-lasting remissions in select patients. The therapeutic landscape for MCL is continuously evolving, with a shift towards nonchemotherapeutic agents like ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax. The introduction of BTK inhibitors has brought about a transformative change in MCL treatment. Nevertheless, the challenge of resistance to BTK inhibitors persists, prompting ongoing efforts to discover strategies for overcoming this resistance. These strategies encompass non-covalent BTK inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, BCL2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy, either as standalone treatments or in combination regimens. Furthermore, developing novel drugs holds promise for further improving the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. In this comprehensive review, we methodically encapsulate MCL's clinical and pathological attributes and the factors influencing prognosis. We also undertake an in-depth examination of stratified treatment alternatives. We investigate conceivable resistance mechanisms in MCL from a genetic standpoint and offer precise insights into various therapeutic approaches for relapsed or refractory MCL., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a unique CD20+, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the bone marrow and circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin M. The clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients are highly variable. High-level evidence supports integration of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to the chemotherapy backbone to treat WM. However, its contemporary management has become more nuanced, with deeper understanding of the pathophysiology and incorporation of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors to the treatment paradigm. Prior knowledge of the patients' MYD88 L265P and CXCR4 mutation status may aid in the treatment decision-making. Currently, the two frequently utilized approaches include fixed-duration chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitor-based continuous treatment until progression. Randomized trials comparing these two vastly divergent approaches are lacking. Recent studies demonstrating efficacy of B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2) inhibitors and non-covalent BTK inhibitors in patients, previously exposed to a covalent BTK inhibitor, are a testament to the rapidly expanding options against WM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Prashant Kapoor, MD is the principal investigator of trials for which Mayo Clinic has received research funding from Amgen, Regeneron, Bristol Myers Squibb, Loxo Pharmaceuticals, Ichnos, Karyopharm, Sanofi, AbbVie and GlaxoSmithKline. Prashant Kapoor has served on the Advisory Boards of BeiGene, Pharmacyclics, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Kite, Oncopeptides, Angitia Bio, GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie and Sanofi. S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD has no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Ibrutinib, a potent irreversible Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was approved by the FDA for treating mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Although ibrutinib exhibited excellent antitumor activity, it was associated with certain adverse reactions, with off-target effects against EGFR, Itk and Src family kinases. Our studies yielded a novel series of substituted benzyl pyrrolopyrimidine derivatives capable of potent inhibition of BTK. Compared with ibrutinib, compound 15c exhibited potent BTK inhibitory activity and enhanced antiproliferative activity, a 12-24-fold increase, against MCL cell lines, with IC 50 values lower than 1 μM. Low micromolar doses of 15c inhibited the BCR signaling pathway and strongly induced the apoptosis of Z138 cells. Ibrutinib and 15c induced autophagy in a dose-dependent manner in Z138 cells. Moreover, compound 15c induced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may be a reason for its potent antiproliferative activity. Importantly, compound 15c showed greater BTK selectivity than ibrutinib, indicating a potentially safer treatment of MCL., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a key component of the B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway and a clinically validated target for small molecule inhibitors such as ibrutinib in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Tirabrutinib (GS-4059/ONO-4059) is a selective, once daily, oral BTK inhibitor with clinical activity against many relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies., Methods: Covalent binding of tirabrutinib to BTK Cys-481 was assessed by LC-MSMS analysis of BTK using compound as a variable modification search parameter. Inhibition potency of tirabrutinib, ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and spebrutinib against BTK and related kinases was studied in a dose-dependent manner either after a fixed incubation time (as used in conventional IC 50 studies) or following a time course where inactivation kinetics were measured., Results: Tirabrutinib irreversibly and covalently binds to BTK Cys-481. The inactivation efficiency k inact /K i was measured and used to calculate selectivity among different kinases for each of the four inhibitors studied. Tirabrutinib showed a k inact /K i value of 2.4 ± 0.6 × 10 4  M -1  s -1 for BTK with selectivity against important off-targets., Conclusions: For the BTK inhibitors tested in this study, analysis of the inactivation kinetics yielded a more accurate measurement of potency and selectivity than conventional single-time point inhibition measurements. Subtle but clear differences were identified between clinically tested BTK inhibitors which may translate into differentiated clinical efficacy and safety., General Significance: This is the first study that offers a detailed side-by-side comparison of four clinically-relevant BTK inhibitors with respect to their inactivation of BTK and related kinases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors are current or former employees and shareholders of Gilead Sciences, Inc., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Preclinical studies have suggested a role for Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) as a potential therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and anti-AML activity in vivo has been demonstrated with BTK inhibitors., Patients and Methods: In this open-label phase 2a study, patients with AML were treated with ibrutinib 560 mg per day alone (cohort 1; n = 7), or ibrutinib in combination with either cytarabine 20 mg administered subcutaneously twice daily for 10 days of a 28-day cycle (cohort 2; n = 21) or azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 administered intravenously once daily on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle (cohort 3; n = 8). Best overall response (primary end point), overall survival, and safety were summarized., Results: A total of 36 patients were enrolled and received treatment; median duration of ibrutinib treatment was 5.4 weeks, and median time on study was 16 months. Of 24 patients evaluable for response, 1 partial remission (cohort 3) and 1 complete remission (cohort 2) were observed; the remaining responses were treatment failures. Median overall survival was 4.0 months in cohort 1, 2.2 months in cohort 2, 2.8 months in cohort 3, and 2.4 months for the overall population. No unexpected safety signals were identified. Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred in ≥ 10% of patients included AML progression, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, asthenia, and respiratory failure., Conclusion: Ibrutinib alone or in combination with cytarabine or azacitidine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. However, limited efficacy with ibrutinib was observed in patients with AML., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ibrutinib is a new-targeted therapy that irreversibly and specifically inhibits the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK), a key component of the signaling pathways of B cells. The results are very encouraging as monotherapy in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. Following the results of recent studies, ibrutinib is now available in France for these three diseases., (Copyright © 2015 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Three agents have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) within the past year. Ibrutinib and idelalisib block B-cell receptor signaling through inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ molecules respectively, interfering with several pathways required for leukemia cell survival. Idelalisib has shown efficacy in the relapsed setting and is currently approved by the FDA for use in combination with rituximab. Ibrutinib has been studied in patients with relapsed CLL and as frontline therapy. In the relapsed setting, these agents produce durable remissions, and might be preferable to re-treatment with chemoimmunotherapy for many patients. Ibrutinib is also effective treatment for patients with deletion 17p and is approved by the FDA as frontline therapy in this patient group, although it does not appear to completely abrogate this adverse prognostic factor. These agents have a unique side effect profile and longer follow-up is required to further understand tolerability and rare adverse effects. Obinutuzumab is a type-2 monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody which results in direct and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of leukemia cells. It is approved by the FDA for use in combination with chlorambucil, and has shown efficacy in the frontline setting in patients unfit for more intensive chemoimmunotherapy. It produces increased response rates and minimal residual disease negativity compared with chlorambucil/rituximab and is associated with an advantage in progression-free survival but not yet overall survival. These agents underscore our advancement in the understanding of the biology of CLL and will improve outcomes for many patients with CLL., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)