Search

Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes for patients with FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma, leading to their regulatory approval in multiple countries. However, as with many targeted therapies, acquired resistance limits their efficacy. A comprehensive, multimodal approach is crucial to characterizing resistance patterns to FGFR inhibitors., Patients and Methods: This study integrated data from six investigative strategies: cell-free DNA, tissue biopsy, rapid autopsy, statistical genomics, in vitro and in vivo studies, and pharmacology. We characterized the diversity, clonality, frequency, and mechanisms of acquired resistance to FGFR inhibitors in patients with FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma. Clinical samples were analyzed longitudinally as part of routine care across 10 institutions., Results: Among 138 patients evaluated, 77 met eligibility, yielding a total of 486 clinical samples. Patients with clinical benefit exhibited a significantly higher rate of FGFR2 kinase domain mutations compared to those without clinical benefit (65% vs 10%, p<0.0001). We identified 26 distinct FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, with 63% of patients harboring multiple. While IC50 assessments indicated strong potency of pan-FGFR inhibitors against common resistance mutations, pharmacokinetic studies revealed that low clinically achievable drug concentrations may underly polyclonal resistance. Molecular brake and gatekeeper mutations predominated, with 94% of patients with FGFR2 mutations exhibiting one or both, whereas mutations at the cysteine residue targeted by covalent inhibitors were rare. Statistical genomics and functional studies demonstrated that mutation frequencies were driven by their combined effects on drug binding and kinase activity rather than intrinsic mutational processes., Conclusion: Our multimodal analysis led to a model characterizing the biology of acquired resistance, informing the rational design of next-generation FGFR inhibitors. FGFR inhibitors should be small, high-affinity, and selective for specific FGFR family members. Tinengotinib, a novel small molecule inhibitor with these characteristics, exhibited preclinical and clinical activity against key resistance mutations. This integrated approach offers a blueprint for advancing drug resistance research across cancer types., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction/background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in prostate cancer (PCa). Better biomarkers are needed to predict responses to ICIs. We sought to demonstrate that a panel-based mutational signature identifies mismatch repair (MMR) deficient (MMRd) PCa and is a biomarker of response to pembrolizumab., Patients and Methods: Clinico-genomic data was obtained for 2664 patients with PCa sequenced at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK). Clinical outcomes were collected for patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) treated with pembrolizumab at DFCI. SigMA was used to characterize tumors as MMRd or MMR proficient (MMRp). The concordance between MMRd with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) was assessed. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected for patients treated with pembrolizumab. Event-time distributions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology., Results: Across both cohorts, 100% (DFCI: 12/12; MSK: 43/43) of MSI-H tumors were MMRd. However, 14% (2/14) and 9.1% (6/66) of MMRd tumors in the DFCI and MSK cohorts respectively were microsatellite stable (MSS), and 26% (17/66) were MSI-indeterminate in the MSK cohort. Among patients treated with pembrolizumab, those with MMRd (n = 5) versus MMRp (n = 14) mCRPC experienced markedly improved rPFS (HR = 0.088, 95% CI: 0.011-0.70; P = .0064) and OS (HR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.014-0.80; P = .010) from start of treatment. Four patients with MMRd experienced remissions of >= 2.5 years., Conclusion: SigMA detects additional cases of MMRd as compared to MSI testing in PCa and identifies patients likely to experience durable response to pembrolizumab., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The antibody-drug conjugates sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) are standard monotherapies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Given the different targets and payloads, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of SG + EV in a phase I trial in mUC (NCT04724018)., Patients and Methods: Patients with mUC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 who had progressed on platinum and/or immunotherapy were enrolled. SG + EV were administered on days 1 + 8 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1. The number of patients treated at each of four pre-specified dose levels (DLs) and the maximum tolerated doses in combination (MTD) were determined using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints., Results: Between May 2021 and April 2023, 24 patients were enrolled; 1 patient never started therapy and was excluded from the analysis. Median age was 70 years (range 41-88 years); 11 patients received ≥3 lines of therapy. Seventy-eight percent (18/23) of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) regardless of attribution at any DL, with one grade 5 AE (pneumonitis possibly related to EV). The recommended phase II doses are SG 8 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support; MTDs are SG 10 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg. The objective response rate was 70% (16/23, 95% confidence interval 47% to 87%) with three complete responses; three patients had progressive disease as best response. With a median follow-up of 14 months, 9/23 patients have ongoing response including 6 responses lasting over 12 months., Conclusions: The combination of SG + EV was assessed at different DLs and a safe dose for phase II was identified. The combination had encouraging activity in patients with mUC with high response rates, including clinically significant complete responses. Additional study of this combination is warranted., Competing Interests: Disclosure BAM reports consulting fees from BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Gilead, Pfizer, SeaGen and research funding to institution from BMS, Exelixis, Pfizer, SeaGen. GPS reports consulting fees from, Genentech, EMD Serono, Merck, Astrazeneca, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, Astrazeneca, Exelixis, Janssen, Bicycle Therapeutics, Pfizer, Gilead, Scholar Rock, G1 Therapeutics, Eli Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Lucence Health, IMV, Vial, Syapse, Tempus, Ellipses Pharma, PrecisCa, Primum. He serves on scientific advisory board for Suba Therapeutics, Syapse, Servier, Merck, Syncorp and reports research support to institution from Sanofi, Astrazeneca, Gilead, Helsinn, Lucence, BMS, EMD Serono, Jazz Therapeutics. He is a paid speaker for BIO – INFORMAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ONCOLOGIA Ltda, OLE Forum (Mexico), Seagen, Gilead, Natera, Exelixis, Janssen, Bayer, Aveo and serves on data safety monitoring committee honorarium for Mereo. His spouse is employed by Myriad. XG reports consulting fees from Bayer, Flare Therapeutics, Myovant, PathAI, PureTech Bio, Silverback Therapeutics. CMM reports consulting fees from Aadi Bioscience, Synthekine and research funding to institution from BMS. XXW reports consulting fees from Novartis and research funding to institution from BMS. JEB reports speaker honoraria from Guardant Health with consulting fees from Guardant Health, Genome Medical, Oncotect, Precede, TracerDx, Musculo, JucaBio. He has equity in Cityblock Health, Genome Medical, Oncotect, Precede, TracerDx, Musculo and institutional patent filed on methods to detect neuroendocrine prostate cancer through tissue-informed cell-free DNA methylation analysis. SAB reports consulting fees from BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Seagen. PKR reports research funding to institution from Bayer, Telix, and Lilly. MDM reports scientific advisory boards for Merck and Janssen. TKC reports consulting fees from Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, HiberCell, IQVA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Nuscan, Novartis, Oncohost, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, CME events (Peerview, OncLive, MJH, CCO and others), outside the submitted work. He has institutional patents filed on molecular alterations and immunotherapy response/toxicity, and ctDNA and equity in Tempest, Pionyr, Osel, Precede Bio, CureResponse, InnDura Therapeutics, Primium. He is supported in part by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE (2P50CA101942-16) and Program 5P30CA006516-56, the Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School and the Trust Family, Michael Brigham, Pan Mass Challenge, Hinda, Arthur Marcus Fund, and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at DFCI. JB reports personal and institutional financial interests with Genentech, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Merck, Takeda, Eisai, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Gilead, Ipsen, and Pierre-Fabre, trial sponsorship through Associació per a la Recerca Oncológia (APRO), royalties from UpToDate, stocks from Rainier Therapeutics, and a nonfinancial interest as President of APRO. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Targeted therapies have transformed clinical management of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis is an attractive approach for cancer genomic profiling that overcomes many limitations of traditional tissue-based analysis. We examined cfDNA as a tool to inform clinical management of patients with advanced BTC and generate novel insights into BTC tumor biology., Patients and Methods: We analyzed next-generation sequencing data of 2068 cfDNA samples from 1671 patients with advanced BTC generated with Guardant360. We carried out clinical annotation on a multi-institutional subset (n = 225) to assess intra-patient cfDNA-tumor concordance and the association of cfDNA variant allele fraction (VAF) with clinical outcomes., Results: Genetic alterations were detected in cfDNA in 84% of patients, with targetable alterations detected in 44% of patients. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations, and BRAF V600E were clonal in the majority of cases, affirming these targetable alterations as early driver events in BTC. Concordance between cfDNA and tissue for mutation detection was high for IDH1 mutations (87%) and BRAF V600E (100%), and low for FGFR2 fusions (18%). cfDNA analysis uncovered novel putative mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies, including mutation of the cysteine residue (FGFR2 C492F) to which covalent FGFR inhibitors bind. High pre-treatment cfDNA VAF was associated with poor prognosis and shorter response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Finally, we report the frequency of promising targets in advanced BTC currently under investigation in other advanced solid tumors, including KRAS G12C (1.0%), KRAS G12D (5.1%), PIK3CA mutations (6.8%), and ERBB2 amplifications (4.9%)., Conclusions: These findings from the largest and most comprehensive study to date of cfDNA from patients with advanced BTC highlight the utility of cfDNA analysis in current management of this disease. Characterization of oncogenic drivers and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance in this study will inform drug development efforts to reduce mortality for patients with BTC., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) variant analysis is commonly used in many cancer subtypes. Cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) has shown high sensitivity for cancer detection. To date, studies have not compared the sensitivity of both methods in a single cancer subtype., Methods: cfDNA from 40 metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients was subjected to targeted panel variant analysis. For 34 of 40, cfMeDIP-seq was also performed. A separate cohort of 38 mRCC patients were used in cfMeDIP-seq analysis to train an RCC classifier., Results: cfDNA variant analysis detected 21 candidate variants in 11 of 40 mRCC patients (28%), after exclusion of 2 germline variants and 6 variants reflecting clonal hematopoiesis. Among 23 patients with parallel tumor sequencing, cfDNA analysis alone identified variants in 9 patients (39%), while cfDNA analysis focused on tumor sequencing variant findings improved the sensitivity to 52%. In 34 mRCC patients undergoing cfMeDIP-seq, cfDNA variant analysis identified variants in 7 (21%), while cfMeDIP-seq detected all mRCC cases (100% sensitivity) with 88% specificity in 34 control subjects. In 5 patients with cfDNA variants and serial samples, variant frequency correlated with response to therapy., Conclusion: cfMeDIP-seq is significantly more sensitive for mRCC detection than cfDNA variant analysis. However, cfDNA variant analysis may be useful for monitoring response to therapy.

Purpose: To date, there has not been a large, systematic evaluation of the prevalence of germline risk variants in urothelial carcinoma (UC)., Methods: We evaluated the frequency of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in 1038 patients with high-risk UC who underwent targeted clinical germline testing. Case-control enrichment analysis was performed to screen for pathogenic variant enrichment in 17 DNA repair genes in 1038 UC patients relative to cancer-free individuals., Results: Among 1038 patients with UC, the cumulative frequency of patients with pathogenic variants was 24%; 18.6% of patients harbored ≥1 actionable germline variant with preventive or therapeutic utility. MSH2 (34/969, 3.5%) and BRCA1/2 (38/867, 4.4%) germline variants had the highest frequency. Germline variants in DNA damage repair genes accounted for 78% of pathogenic germline variants. Compared to the cancer-free cohort, UC patients had significant variant enrichment in MSH2 (odds ratio [OR]: 15.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-32.7, p < 0.0001), MLH1 (OR: 15.9, 95% CI: 4.4-67.7, p < 0.0001), BRCA2 (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 3.2-9.6, p < 0.0001), and ATM (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.8-8.3, p = 0.02)., Conclusion: In this study, 24% of UC patients harbored pathogenic germline variants and 18.6% had clinically actionable variants. MLH1 and MSH2 were validated as UC risk genes while ATM and BRCA2 were highlighted as potential UC predisposition genes. This work emphasizes the utility of germline testing in selected high-risk UC cohorts.