Search

Purpose: This review focuses on cerebral complications of hypertension, which include stroke, impairment of cognitive function, dementia, and possibly depression and anxiety. These conditions are major causes of morbidity and mortality in the elderly., Current Knowledge and Key Points: Not only elevated diastolic blood pressure, but also isolated systolic hypertension and elevated pulse pressure play an important role in the development of brain complications. Randomised placebo-controlled trials have provided evidence that reduction of hypertension decreases safely and effectively morbidity and mortality rates in the elderly. The new classes of drugs, in particular calcium-channels blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, have been shown to be as effective as the originally used diuretics and beta-blockers., Future Prospects and Projects: Several trials are currently in progress and should provide more information on the benefit of antihypertensive treatment in very elderly persons (Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial, HYVET) and secondary prevention of stroke (PROGRESS). The importance of assessing new dosages of the presently used antihypertensive drugs as well as the benefit of new classes of drugs is emphasised. Further trials specifically focusing on the prevention of dementia by antihypertensive drugs are needed to confirm the results of the Syst-Eur Vascular Dementia Project. The benefit of calcium antagonists in the prevention of dementia in elderly hypertensive patients should be assessed in the Dementia Prevention in Hypertension trial (DEPHY).

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of labetalol, an alpha and beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent in 32 patients aged from 72 to 97 years (mean = 85 years) with blood pressure (B.P.) greater than or equal to 160/95 mmHg. This study was carried out in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. After 6 weeks of treatment with labetalol (mean dose = 235 +/- 47.5 mg/day), the systolic pressure was lowered from 187 +/- 24 to 145 +/- 28 mmHg (p less than 0.001) and the diastolic pressure from 98 +/- 10 to 82 +/- 9 mmHg (p less than 0.001). Likewise, in the placebo group, both systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly reduced but the changes were significantly greater in the labetalol group, -33 +/- 26 versus -13 +/- 20 mmHg and -14 +/- 10 versus -8 +/- 14 mmHg respectively. Labetalol achieved B.P. control (160/95 mmHg) in 64% of the treated patients, compared to 40% in the placebo group. Two patients on labetalol discontinued their treatment due to side-effects (one bradycardia and one cutaneous reaction) compared with one patient on placebo (cardiac failure). Two other cases in the labetalol group had side-effects (one fatigue and one dizziness) which prevented increasing the treatment as necessary.