Search

Objective: The integration of end of life care into emergency work is gaining momentum, especially in Australia. Emergency doctors and nurses are increasingly required to make decisions regarding the provision of end of life care. The importance of end of life care for patients and their families in the emergency department is well documented, but ethical dilemmas that arise in end of life care provision are not widely researched., Methods: A qualitative interpretative design and phenomenological approach were used to create an understanding and meaning about ethical dilemmas faced by emergency nurses and doctors in end of life care. Sixteen doctors and nurses were purposively recruited through professional organisations. Data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using a qualitative seven stage thematic analysis., Results: The overarching constitutive pattern 'decision making processes' was conceptualised within the two identified major themes including: 1) Short-term (ST) versus Long-term (LT) ethical dilemmas and; 2) Individual versus community ethical dilemmas. These themes were uncovered using the phenomenological hermeneutic concepts of epoche (openness) to construct meaning and understanding for participants., Conclusions: In this study, the frequent experiences of ethical dilemmas by emergency doctors and nurses demonstrated that end of life care in the emergency department was challenging. The stated experiences were related to barriers that contributed to the complexities reported in making ethical decisions at the end of life. Therefore, an understanding of ethical principles is needed to navigate care for patients and their families for the best possible outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The number of people dying in emergency departments (EDs) is increasing. However, EDs are not well designed or resourced for safe and effective End-Of-Life (EOL) care encounters, and there is little evidence regarding clinicians' perceptions and experiences of providing such care when the death is sudden and unexpected., Aim: This study explored nurses' perceptions and experiences of caring for patients who die suddenly and unexpectedly in the ED., Methods: Open-end responses were collected as part of a larger descriptive survey design. The qualitative data were analysed thematically., Results: 211 ED nurse completed the online survey. Within the qualitative data, five themes were identified during analysis: 1) key elements of EOL care, 2) systemic and environmental barriers, 3) educational deficits, 4) role ambiguity, and 5) emotional impact. Participants identified communication, a standardised approach, and better educational preparedness as the most important elements of EOL care when the death was sudden and unexpected., Conclusions: ED nurses want to provide high quality care to dying patients and their families. However, their efforts are hampered by systemic and environmental barriers outside their control. There is a need for a culture shift to overcome the barriers that currently obstruct ED nurses from providing meaningful and effective EOL care in the ED., (Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Context: Despite limited clinical evidence, long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is used for the management of refractory breathlessness in people with life-limiting illnesses who are not necessarily hypoxemic., Objectives: The aim of this study was to understand caregiver factors associated with caring for someone with LTOT from the perspectives and experiences of caregivers themselves., Methods: The qualitative study used semistructured interviews. The study was conducted in two states in Australia. Participants (n = 20) were self-nominated caregivers of people receiving LTOT for refractory breathlessness in the palliative setting., Results: Data analyses established one overarching theme titled: "Oxygen giveth (something to help caregivers relieve breathlessness) and oxygen taketh away (from patients who lose some autonomy)." The theme captured caregivers' feelings of extreme distress in response to witnessing refractory breathlessness, and oxygen fulfilling several critical and beneficial roles in this context. In parallel, caregivers also explicitly and implicitly articulated several downsides to the use of LTOT., Conclusion: Caregivers find caring for someone with refractory breathlessness extremely distressing. The benefits of LTOT are often overestimated, whereas its potential harms are underestimated. As significant stakeholders of people receiving LTOT, caregivers should be provided with opportunities to collaborate with clinicians in evidence-based decision making, efforts should be made to provide them with information and education about the most effective pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies to manage refractory breathlessness in a palliative care setting including the appropriate use of LTOT to enable them to do so., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)