Search

Background: Multiple investigators have described an increased incidence of thromboembolic events in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Data concerning hemostatic complications in children hospitalized for COVID-19/multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are scant., Objectives: To share our experience in managing SARS-CoV-2-associated pro-coagulant state in hospitalized children., Methods: D-dimer values were recorded at diagnosis in children hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2-related manifestations. In moderately to critically ill patients and MIS-C cases, coagulation and inflammatory markers were checked at multiple time points and median results were compared. Pro-thrombotic risk factors were appraised for each child and thromboprophylaxis was started in selected cases., Results: Thirty-five patients were prospectively enrolled. D-dimer values did not discriminate COVID-19 of differing severity, whereas were markedly different between the COVID-19 and the MIS-C cohorts. In both cohorts, D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels increased upon clinical worsening but were not accompanied by decreased fibrinogen or platelet values, with all parameters returning to normal upon disease resolution. Six patients had multiple thrombotic risk factors and were started on pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. No deaths or thrombotic or bleeding complications occurred., Conclusions: COVID-19 pediatric patients show mildly altered coagulation and inflammatory parameters; on the other hand, MIS-C cases showed laboratory signs of an inflammatory driven pro-coagulant status. Universal anticoagulant prophylaxis in hospitalized children with SARS-CoV-2-related manifestations is not warranted, but may be offered to patients with other pro-thrombotic risk factors in the context of a multi-modal therapeutic approach., (© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Deep neck infection (DNI) is a severe occurrence in children. We've examined the presenting signs and symptoms, the value of single diagnostic procedures, the rate of complications and the impact of the therapeutic options on the final outcome, in children with a DNI. We retrospectively evaluated patients, aged 0-18 years, who were admitted for a DNI, from January 2006 through December 2012, at Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy. We subdivided them on the basis of type of treatment: pharmacological treatment alone or antimicrobial treatment plus surgery. An univariate analysis has been performed to examine the differences between the two groups. Sixty patients (32 males, 28 females) with diagnosis of DNI were enrolled; 33 children only received medical treatment (group 1), whereas 27 patients underwent also surgical interventions (group 2). The mean abscess size was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p = 0.01). The predominant organisms were Streptococcus sp. (11 cases, 52.4%, mostly Streptococcus pyogenes). The most frequent antibiotic regimen was a β lactam alone (either III generation cephalosporin or amoxicillin/clavulanate). The duration of intravenous antibiotic varied between the two groups, without statistical significance (p = 0.052); whereas the oral antibiotic administration was significantly shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.0003). Three patients (5%) developed complications. This research confirms that the medical approach, with high doses of intravenous antibiotics for a minimum of 5 days, could be a tolerable and safe option for the treatment of patients with stable condition and/or small DNIs., (Copyright © 2014 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)