Search

The article discusses the ionic gelation of cationic chitosan (CS) with anionic hyaluronic acid (HA) sodium salt to form nanoparticles in the range of 125 nm. The particles were further functionalized with cetuximab to endow it with the ability to spatially target the tumor over-expressing EGFR. Solid-state characterization of the particles using XRD, FTIR, and DSC revealed the formation of stable nanoparticles with Cabazitaxel loaded in the amorphous nanostructure. XPS study used to assess the surface characteristics indicated that the cetuximab was successfully anchored on the surface of the particle. The prepared CS-HA-Cmab-NP elicited a pH-responsive drug release behavior due to the presence of CS in the matrix. In vitro performance of the nanoparticles was evaluated on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines showed overall increase in efficacy. In vivo pharmacokinetic and anti-tumor effect evaluated in female Sprague Dawley rats indicated that the Cmab-conjugated nanoparticles improved half-life of cabazitaxel and tumor reduction capability with higher survival rate and lower reduction in body weight. The results indicate that CS/HA nanoparticles anchored with cetuximab show enhanced efficacy in reducing the breast cancer tumor in DMBA-induced breast tumor model through spatial targeting, consequently reducing the systemic toxicity.

Liver fibrosis, developed in almost all chronic liver injuries. Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) have been thought to contribute to cirrhosis and liver fibrosis. Therefore, using a rat model of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver fibrogenesis, we investigated the preventive effects of cetuximab, an inhibitor of the EGF receptor (EGFR). Ameliorative effects of cetuximab were examined in rats, brought on by biweekly doses of 50 mg/kg of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). There were a total of 24 male Long Evans rats split up into four distinct groups such as control, CCl4, control+cetuximab and CCl4+cetuximab. After two weeks of treatment with cetuximab (100 μg/kg), samples of tissue and blood were taken after all the rats had been sacrificed. Plasma samples were examined for the biochemical indicators of inflammation and oxidative stress. Histological staining on liver sections was performed for morphologic pathologies, and related genes expressions analysis were done with RT-PCR in liver tissue. The findings showed that cetuximab could raise the levels of glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) and considerably lower the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), malondialdehyde (MDA), and nitric oxide (NO). Sirius red staining and hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) displayed that cetuximab therapy reduced the inflammatory cells infiltration and enhanced fibrotic lesions. In the meantime, cetuximab therapy also dramatically reduces the expression of genes linked to inflammation in the liver tissue, including NF-кB, iNOS, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β. To sum up, the anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antioxidant properties of cetuximab confer curative efficacy against liver fibrosis.

Background: Radiotherapy combined with fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with a 20–25% pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Cetuximab increases the efficacy of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck carcinomas. The aim of this phase I/II trial was to determine the optimal doses and the pCR rate with chemoradiotherapy (C-RT) plus cetuximab. Methods: A 45-Gy radiotherapy regimen was delivered over 5 weeks. The phase I study determined the dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose of 5FU-cisplatin plus cetuximab. The phase II trial aimed to exhibit a pCR rate > 20 % (25 % expected), requiring 33 patients (6 from phase I part plus 27 in phase II part). pCR was defined as ypT0Nx. Results: The phase I study established the following recommended doses: weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 one week before, and 250 mg/m2 during radiotherapy); 5FU (500 mg/m2/day, d1-d4) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m2, d1) during week 1 and 5. In the phase II part, 32 patients received C-RT before surgery, 31 patients underwent surgery, and resection was achieved in 27 patients. A pCR was achieved in five patients (18.5 %) out of 27. After a median follow-up of 19 months, the median progression-free survival was 13.7 months, and the median overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: Adding cetuximab to preoperative C-RT was toxic and did not achieve a pCR > 20 % as required. The recommended doses, determined during the phase I part, could explain these disappointing results due to a reduction in chemotherapy dose-intensity. Trial registration: This trial was registered with EudraCT number 2006-004770-27.

Sinonasal NUT carcinoma (NC) is an exceptionally rare and fatal form of cancer, and the literature on this pathology is scarce. In this article, we report a case of ethmoidal NUT carcinoma, initially locally advanced then metastatic. Our case is the first to test immunotherapy and anti-EGFR in metastatic sinonasal NUT carcinoma.This is a 47-year-old man diagnosed with ethmoidal NUT carcinoma cT4N0M0. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) was started with 5 cycles of TCF (Docetaxel 40 mg/m2 CDDP 40mg/m2 and 5FU 2000mg/m2), resulting in a discrete partial metabolic response, followed by radiotherapy (RT) (total dose, 70 Gy; 2 Gy × 35 Fractions). The PET scan re-evaluated at 2 months showed no tumor response and metastatic bone progression. In view of the epidermoid component of the histology, treatment with Nivolumab was introduced, but failed after 6 cycles, followed by Carboplatin (AUC 2), Paclitaxel (80mg/m2) 3 weeks out of 4 and Cetuximab (500mg/m2) twice monthly, but failed after 3 cycles, and finally Vinorebline (30mg) 3 times weekly, stopped early due to deterioration in general condition. The patient died 17 months after initial diagnosis.

Background: While the triplet combination of encorafenib (ENCO), binimetinib (BINI), plus cetuximab (CET) yielded a higher response rate compared with the doublet combination of ENCO plus CET, no significant survival benefits of the triplet combination were observed in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), according to the BEACON CRC study. Although ENCO plus CET is the standard second-line therapy, poor prognoses are expected after disease progression. Trial design: BAYONET is a single-arm multicenter phase II trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of staged combination with ENCO, BINI, plus CET for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC refractory to ENCO plus CET. The main inclusion criteria are as follows: RAS wild-type/BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC;

Purpose: There is evidence that adding cetuximab can overcome resistance to irinotecan, but a similar analysis with Panitumumab isn't readily available. This study evaluated the activity of each anti-EGFR plus irinotecan as a salvage third-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who progressed to irinotecan monotherapy and were exposed to an anti-EGFR antibody as a third line of treatment. This study was conducted at a single cancer center in Brazil. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate, stratified by primary tumor sidedness, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Results: This analysis included 412 patients who had progressed on irinotecan and were KRAS wild-type. One hundred eighty-two received Irinotecan plus Cetuximab (I + C group) and 230 Irinotecan plus Panitumumab (I + P group). There was no significant difference in median overall survival between treatment groups (9.1 months [I + C] vs 10.1 months [I + P]; p = 0.76). There was also no difference in progression-free survival (3.63 months [I + C] vs 3.73 months [I + P]; p = 0.19) and objective response rate (23.0 % [I + C] vs 22.3 % [I + P]; p = 0.97). Patients with right-sided tumors had worse overall survival than left-sided (6.2 months vs 10.1 months; p = 0.003) but presented a better objective response rate with panitumumab (8.3 % [I + P] vs 3.3 % [I + C]). There were more infusion reactions with cetuximab. Conclusions: Panitumumab and cetuximab have similar activity when combined with irinotecan as treatment for patients with disease progression with an irinotecan regimen, potentially rescuing the irinotecan activity.

Background: The aim of the study was to explore the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with previously irradiated but unresectable recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (rHNSCC) treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus cetuximab at a single institute in Taiwan. Methods: From February 2016 to March 2019, 74 patients with previously irradiated but unresectable rHNSCC were treated with SBRT plus cetuximab. All patients received irradiation to the gross tumor and/or nodal area with 40–50 Gy in five fractions, with each fraction interval ≥2 days over a 2-week period by using the CyberKnife M6 machine. An18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan was performed before treatment for treatment target delineation (n = 74) and 2 months later for response evaluation (n = 60). The median follow-up time was 9 months (range 1–36 months). Results: The treatment response rate was complete response: 25.0%, partial response: 41.7%, stable disease: 11.7%, and progressive disease: 21.7% based on the criteria of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (n = 72) and complete metabolic response: 21.7%, partial metabolic response: 51.7%, stable metabolic disease: 13.3%, and progressive metabolic disease: 13.3% based on PET-CT (n = 60), respectively. The 1-/2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 42.8%/22.0% and 40.5%/19.0%, respectively. In the logistic regression model, a re-irradiation interval >12 months was observed to be the only significant prognostic factor for a favorable treatment response. In the Cox proportional hazards model, a re-irradiation interval >12 months and gross tumor volume (GTV) ≦ 50 ml were favorable prognostic factors of OS and PFS. Conclusion: SBRT plus cetuximab provides a promising salvage strategy for those patients with previously irradiated but unresectable rHNSCC, especially those with a re-irradiation interval >12 months or GTV ≦ 50 ml.

Purpose: Addressing the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-pathway by the competitive receptor ligand cetuximab is a promising strategy in pancreatic cancer. In the prospective randomized controlled phase II PARC-study (PARC: Pancreatic cancer treatment with radiotherapy (RT) and cetuximab), we evaluated safety and efficacy of a trimodal treatment scheme consisting of cetuximab, gemcitabine and RT in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: Between January 2005 and April 2007, 68 patients with inoperable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomized in either trimodal therapy followed by gemcitabine maintenance (Arm A) or in trimodal therapy followed by gemcitabine plus cetuximab maintenance (Arm B). Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) was performed with a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and with a simultaneous integrated boost to the gross tumor (54 Gy). Within the trimodal therapy, gemcitabine and cetuximab were administered weekly. Maintenance therapy consisted of gemcitabine only or gemcitabine plus cetuximab. Toxicity, overall survival (OS), secondary resection rate, local control and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Results: With a median followup time of 13 months (range: 2 – 184 months), one patient is still alive and one patient is lost to follow-up. Nausea and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were the most important higher-graded (>°II) acute and late non-hematological toxicity (13% and 7%). Median OS was 13.1 months without significant difference between both treatment arms (Arm A: 11.9 months; Arm B: 14.2 months). Compared to historical data, cetuximab did not improve OS. One- and two-year local control rates were 76.6% and 68.9%. Local tumor control and secondary resection rate (Arm A: 4%; Arm B: 16%) were significantly improved in Arm B. Median PFS was 6.8 months with distant metastasis as main treatment failure. Conclusion: Trimodal therapy consisting of IMRT, gemcitabine and cetuximab can be considered safe and feasible. Compared to historical data, cetuximab does not improve treatment efficacy in LAPC patients treated with chemoradiation.

Since the introduction of Cetuximab as a biological molecule against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), its use in the cancers of head and neck region is widely explored. With the recognition that EGFR expression is associated with radioresistance and poor prognosis, incorporation of an anti-EGFR agent along with Radiotherapy (RT) is a logical and attractive option. Cetuximab in combination with RT as Bio-Radiotherapy (BRT) is considered one of the standard treatment modalities in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers (LA-HNSCC). Many important phase-III clinical trials were undertaken simultaneously, where the use of Cetuximab BRT was tested in various clinical scenarios with different hypothesis. With the studies still ongoing and the results awaited, its use was continued in clinical practice. Today the results are out and definitely not encouraging. After the initial success, Cetuximab has miserably failed to win over cisplatin based chemoradiation which is the current standard of care in LA-HNSCC. Hence, it is the need of the hour to re-evaluate and define the present role of Cetuximab in the definitive management of LA-HNSCC in the light of the latest clinical evidence..

Introduction: Bevacizumab and antiepidermal growth factor receptor-blocking (anti-EGFR) agents plus chemotherapy are first-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Conversion surgery may improve outcomes; however, the extent to which it explains the difference in mortality rates among treatments is unclear. Herein, we aimed to assess the effects of conversion surgery on survival outcomes of patients with unresectable mCRC treated with bevacizumab and anti-EGFR agents., Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab and anti-EGFR agents as first-line therapy. We estimated the direct and indirect effects of treatments by comparing the mortality risk associated with targeted therapy type. Hazard ratios (HR) and the corresponding confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Mediation analysis was used to estimate hazard ratio differences, and the proportion mediated., Results: A total of 5,106 patients were included. The natural indirect effect of conversion surgery reduced mortality risk (HR: 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97), with a mediated proportion of 42% after propensity score adjustment. In subgroup analyses, KRAS wild-type (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97), left tumor sidedness (HR: 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), and liver resection (HR: 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) were associated with reduced risks of mortality. The controlled and total direct effects of targeted therapy were associated with reduced mortality risk in the anti-EGFR-treated group compared to those in the bevacizumab-treated group; however, this effect was not statistically significant., Conclusion: Conversion surgery may account for the difference in survival outcomes between users of the anti-EGFR agents and bevacizumab., Competing Interests: Disclosure None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Colorectal cancers (CRC) with BRAF V600E mutation exhibit limited chemotherapy response and a poor prognosis. Safety and efficacy of the VIC (Vemurafenib/Irinotecan/Cetuximab) regimen in the first-line setting for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC remain undetermined., Methods: In the prospective cohort study, the untreated, BRAF V600E-mutated, unresectable or metastatic CRC patients were enrolled. The VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy were compared in the first-line setting. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated., Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis, 38 patients received VIC regimen and 40 received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. The ORR and DCR in the VIC group were significantly higher than in the bevacizumab-therapy group (ORR: 63.2% vs. 37.5%, P = .025; DCR: 94.7% vs. 75.0%, P = .019). The VIC regimen significantly outperformed bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in both PFS (11.9 vs. 7.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.87; P = .010) and OS (25.3 vs. 14.6 months; HR = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P = .011). In the VIC group, the conversion resection rate for liver metastases was 34.8% (8 of 23 patients), and for unresectable local CRC it was 54.5% (6 of 11 patients). The adverse events rates of Grade 3 to 4 were 34.2% and 32.5% for the VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy respectively., Conclusions: Among Asian patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, the VIC regimen showed favorable outcomes compared to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in terms of tumor response and oncological survival, with a tolerable and manageable toxicity profile in the first-line setting., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Patient-derived tumor organoids recapitulate the characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) and provide an ideal platform for preclinical evaluation of personalized treatment options. We aimed to model the acquisition of chemotolerance during first-line combination chemotherapy in metastatic CRC organoids. Methods: We performed next-generation sequencing to study the evolution of KRAS wild-type CRC organoids during adaptation to irinotecan-based chemotherapy combined with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 protein (Cas9)-editing showed the specific effect of KRASG12D acquisition in drug-tolerant organoids. Compound treatment strategies involving Aurora kinase A (AURKA) inhibition were assessed for their capability to induce apoptosis in a drug-persister background. Immunohistochemical detection of AURKA was performed on a patient-matched cohort of primary tumors and derived liver metastases. Results: Adaptation to combination chemotherapy was accompanied by transcriptomic rather than gene mutational alterations in CRC organoids. Drug-tolerant cells evaded apoptosis and up-regulated MYC (c-myelocytomatosis oncogene product)/E2F1 (E2 family transcription factor 1) and/or interferon-α–related gene expression. Introduction of KRASG12D further increased the resilience of drug-persister CRC organoids against combination therapy. AURKA inhibition restored an apoptotic response in drug-tolerant KRAS–wild-type organoids. In dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)– pathway blockade-primed CRC organoids expressing KRASG12D, AURKA inhibition augmented apoptosis in cases that had acquired increased c-MYC protein levels during chemotolerance development. In patient-matched CRC cohorts, AURKA expression was increased in primary tumors and derived liver metastases. Conclusions: Our study emphasizes the potential of patient-derived CRC organoids in modeling chemotherapy tolerance ex vivo. The applied therapeutic strategy of dual EGFR pathway blockade in combination with AURKA inhibition may prove effective for second-line treatment of chemotolerant CRC liver metastases with acquired KRAS mutation and increased AURKA/c-MYC expression.

Introduction: We present the results of a phase 2a trial of first-line avelumab (anti–programmed death-ligand 1 antibody) plus cetuximab (anti–EGFR antibody) in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC. Methods: Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous NSCLC received avelumab 800 mg (d 1 and 8), cetuximab 250 mg/m2 (d 1) and 500 mg/m2 (d 8), cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (d 1), and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (d 1 and 8) for four 3-week cycles, followed by avelumab 800 mg and cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the best overall response; the secondary end points were progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. Efficacy analyses were reported from an updated data cutoff. Results: A total of 43 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 6.6 months for the primary analyses and 9.2 months for the efficacy analyses. In the efficacy analyses, 15 patients had a confirmed partial response (objective response rate, 34.9% [95% confidence interval: 21.0%–50.9%]), and the median duration of response was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval: 4.2–12.5 mo). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months and 10.0 months, respectively. In the safety analyses (primary analysis), 38 patients (88.4%) had a treatment-related adverse event, of whom 24 (55.8%) had a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event. Conclusions: The combination of avelumab + cetuximab and chemotherapy showed antitumor activity and tolerable safety; however, the ORR was not improved compared with those reported for current standards of care (NCT03717155).

To overcome poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity of triptolide (TPL), a natural compound that exhibits potent anticancer activities, we developed a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) to specifically deliver TPL to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-overexpressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and others. The ADC (Cet-TPL) is made by conjugation of TPL to lysine residues of cetuximab (Cet), a clinically available anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. Studies of antitumor efficacy demonstrated that Cet-TPL drastically suppressed in vitro proliferation and in vivo growth of these EGFR-overexpressing cancers, including NSCLC A549 and H1299 cells and two patient-derived xenografts, and head and neck squamous carcinoma UM-SCC6 cell, while it did not inhibit the proliferation and growth of NSCLC H520 that rarely expresses EGFR. Furthermore, immunofluorescence analysis revealed that Cet-TPL was effectively internalized and transported into lysosomes of EGFR-overexpressing cells. Cet-TPL effectively led to degradation of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and demethylation of histone H3 lysines, and significantly induced apoptosis in these EGFR-overexpressing cancers. Compared with TPL, Cet, or their combination, Cet-TPL displayed higher target-specific cytotoxicity against EGFR-expressing cancers and much lower in vivo toxicity. In addition, Cet-TPL efficiently suppressed the activated EGFR pathway in UM-SCC6 cancer cells. Taken together, Cet-TPL represents a potent targeting therapeutic agent against EGFR-overexpressing NSCLC and others.

Lack of effective targeted therapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) underscores the urgent need for identifying new treatment approaches for this challenging disease. We sought to assess the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy for first-line treatment in patients with metastatic ESCC. In this randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II clinical trial, patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel-cisplatin (TP) (paclitaxel [175 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 of every 3-week cycle] and cisplatin [75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of every 3-week cycle]) and TP plus cetuximab (CTP) (cetuximab, 400 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of week 1, followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly), respectively. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 89 tumor samples for biomarker exploration. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 22.6 months, median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8–7.0) in patients administered CTP versus 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.0–5.3) in the TP group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40–0.93; p = 0.02). Median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.9–13.1) in the CTP group and 10.5 months (95% CI: 9.0–13.2) in the TP arm (HR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.67–1.44; p = 0.91). The most common reported greater than or equal to grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (35.2% versus 22.4%) and leukopenia (25.4% versus 13.2%). In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification tumors (15.7%), PFS was improved with CTP compared with TP treatment (HR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01–0.98; p = 0.018). First-line CTP significantly improves PFS, with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic ESCC.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: After the development of acquired resistance to osimertinib, the standard-of-care treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC is chemotherapy. Whether afatinib, a pan-ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active after progression on osimertinib is unknown. Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received afatinib-containing therapy after progression on osimertinib. Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of afatinib. Results: After progression on first (N=3) or second-line plus (N=12) osimertinib, 15 patients received afatinib monotherapy (N=3), afatinib and cetuximab (N=10), or afatinib and bevacizumab (N=2). The objective response rate was 6.7% and disease control rate was 53.3%. Median PFS was 2.5 months and median OS was 7.7 months. Median PFS of ≥ 6 months versus < 6 months on osimertinib was associated with a significantly greater median PFS on afatinib (4.0 versus 1.4 months; P=0.003), although there was no significant difference in median OS (9.3 versus 6.6 months; P=0.123). Best response of stable disease/partial response versus progressive disease on osimertinib was associated with a significantly greater median PFS on afatinib (3.4 versus 1.6 months; P=0.036) and a significantly greater median OS (8.7 versus 4.6 months; P=0.017). Conclusion: Afatinib-containing therapy had limited activity in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on osimertinib in this cohort of mostly second-line plus osimertinib. Response and longer PFS to prior osimertinib may be predictive of response to afatinib. Strategies based on osimertinib resistance mechanisms may further define the role of subsequent afatinib.

Objective: Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a systemic therapy currently used in the treatment of patients with lymphoma. RIT complexes consist of a targeting molecule, commonly an antibody, radionuclide chelates and a linker which can be a nanoparticle platform. Nanoparticles facilitate the attachment of multiple radionuclides and targeting groups to a single complex. Here the target affinity, duration of target association and inhibition of colony formation of Cetuximab-resistant tumour cells with Cetuximab-targeted [177Lu]-AuNPs were investigated. Dose distribution in xenografts derived from EGFR-overexpressing cells was also determined. Methods: Cetuximab-targeted [177Lu]-AuNPs were generated by functionalising 15nm AuNPs with the chelator DOTA and Cetuximab and radiolabelling with 177LuCl3. KDis, a measure of affinity, was determined by competitive binding to EGFR expressing cells. Radio-sensitivity was determined in EGFR expressing tumour cells including the Cetuximab resistant cell line HCT116 using a colony formation assay. Dose distribution was measured in sections from xenografts grown in nude mice using autoradiography. Results: KDis for the complex binding to EGFR on MDA-MB-468 cells was 20 nM. Loss of cell associated [177Lu] activity was biphasic with loss of about 50% of activity in about 4 h. Remaining activity dissociated over a period of about 4 days. HCT8 and MDA-MB-468, but not HCT116 cells were sensitive to the growth inhibitory effect of Cetuximab. However, treatment with Cetuximab-targeted [177Lu]-AuNPs inhibited colony formation in all 3 cell lines. Dose distribution across sections from xenografts was found to demonstrate a co-efficient of variation of 15%. Conclusion: Cetuximab-targeted [177Lu]-AuNPs demonstrate high affinity for EGFR and could be an effective treatment for Cetuximab-resistant colorectal cancer cells. A strategy involving pre-treatment with receptor targeted[177Lu] to improve RIT therapeutic ratios has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes.

Background: Cetuximab (chimeric monoclonal antibody to human epidermal growth factor receptor) is used to treat colorectal and head and neck cancers. Due to cross-reactivity with galactose-α-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal), it can induce hypersensitivity even at first administration. We aimed to determine the incidence and clinical manifestation of cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis, and to establish a means of predicting its incidence in patients ahead of treatment. Methods: Nationwide and single-center pharmacovigilance data from 2010 to 2017 were collected from the Korea Institute of Drug Safety-Korea Adverse Event Reporting System and Severance Regional Pharmacovigilance Center. Patients scheduled for cetuximab administration were enrolled prospectively. A skin prick test was carried out and serum IgE specific to cetuximab and cross-reactive allergens were measured. Reactions were monitored after cetuximab infusion. Results: Over 8 years, there were 23 reports of anaphylaxis nationwide. In a single-center study, incidence of cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis was 1.1%. Most anaphylaxis occurred at first injection (93.3%), even under pretreatment with anti-allergic drugs. Four of 64 patients (6.3%) experienced severe anaphylaxis. The median cetuximab-specific IgE titer was 6.9 kUA/L in patients experiencing anaphylaxis and 0 kUA/L in those who did not (P

Many patients fail to respond to EGFR-targeted therapeutics, and personalized diagnostics is needed to identify putative responders. We investigated 1630 colorectal and lung squamous carcinomas and 1357 normal lung and colon samples and observed huge variation in EGFR pathway activation in both cancerous and healthy tissues, irrespectively on EGFR gene mutation status. We investigated whether human blood serum can affect squamous carcinoma cell growth and EGFR drug response. We demonstrate that human serum antagonizes the effects of EGFR-targeted drugs erlotinib and cetuximab on A431 squamous carcinoma cells by increasing IC50 by about 2- and 20-fold, respectively. The effects on clonogenicity varied significantly across the individual serum samples in every experiment, with up to 100% differences. EGF concentration could explain many effects of blood serum samples, and EGFR ligands-depleted serum showed lesser effect on drug sensitivity.

Background: Triplet chemotherapy plus cetuximab showed promising results in phase II trials in unsystematically selected RAS population. We evaluated FOLFIRINOX+cetuximab efficacy as first-line treatment in extended RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with FOLFIRINOX+cetuximab, using data from clinical trials and real-life practice. Extended mutation analysis was performed when RAS/BRAF status was unavailable. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Seventy patients (61.4 % male, median age 58.7 years) were analyzed. Eighty percent had left-sided mCRC and 97.1 % had liver metastases. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 13.3 and 48.5 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 85.7 %, with 20 % complete response. Primary tumor location did not affect OS and PFS. BRAF wild-type patients (n = 65) had longer PFS (13.3 vs. 6.0 months; p = 0.005) and OS (50.1 vs. 21.2 months; p = 0.007) than BRAF mutated patients (n = 5, including four BRAF V600E ). Median OS was significantly longer in resected patients (n = 39, 55.1 vs. 30.7 months; p = 0.030). Main toxicities were diarrhea (31.4 %) and neutropenia (21.4 %)., Conclusion: FOLFIRINOX+cetuximab provides good PFS, high response rate and prolonged disease control in initially unresectable extended RAS wild-type mCRC. This combination is particularly interesting for selected patients with liver-limited disease eligible to secondary resection., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition with cetuximab is a standard treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Activation of the receptor tyrosine kinases AXL, MET and VEGFR can mediate resistance to cetuximab. Cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor (MKI) targeting AXL/MET/VEGFR, has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models of HNSCC. This investigator- initiated phase I trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of cetuximab plus cabozantinib in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC., Materials and Methods: Patients received cetuximab concurrently with cabozantinib daily on a 28-day cycle. Using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, the primary endpoint was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of cabozantinib. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) RESULTS: Among the 20 patients enrolled, most had prior disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (95 %), platinum-based chemotherapy (95 %), and cetuximab (80 %). No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded and the MTD for cabozantinib was established to be 60 mg. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 65 % of patients (n = 13). ORR was 20 %, with 4 partial responses (PRs). Two PRs were observed in cetuximab-naïve patients (n = 4), with an ORR of 50 % in this subgroup. In the overall population, DCR was 75 %, median PFS was 3.4 months and median OS was 8.1 months., Conclusion: Cetuximab plus cabozantinib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile and preliminary efficacy in patients with heavily treated R/M HNSCC. The combination of cetuximab with MKIs targeting the AXL/MET/VEGFR axis warrants further investigation, including in cetuximab-naïve patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: An important unmet need for new treatment options remains for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC) previously treated with both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody. Retrospective studies suggest that previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor might augment the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy. Here, we conducted a phase II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel plus biweekly cetuximab for patients in this setting., Patients and Methods: This was a single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial. Key eligibility criteria were R/M-HNSCC, and previous treatment with both platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1 antibody. Paclitaxel plus biweekly cetuximab consisted of weekly paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 (days 1, 8, 15) and biweekly cetuximab 500 mg/m 2 (days 1, 15) with a cycle of 28 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0)., Results: Between August 2020 and August 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, of whom 33 were assessable for response. ORR was 69.6% (95% confidence interval 51.2% to 84.4%). With a median follow-up period for survivors of 16.6 months, median PFS and OS were 5.5 and 13.3 months, respectively. DCR was 93.7%. Twenty-three patients (65%) experienced grade 3 or 4 AEs, including neutropenia (34%), infection (14%), leukopenia (11%), mucositis (8%), and pneumonitis (8%). Eight patients discontinued study treatment due to treatment-related AEs, and no treatment-related death was observed., Conclusions: Paclitaxel plus biweekly cetuximab showed highly encouraging efficacy and manageable toxicities in R/M-HNSCC patients previously treated with both platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1 antibody. This combination therapy warrants further investigation in this setting., Competing Interests: Disclosure TK has received invited speaker fees from Shionogi, Merck Biopharma, and Nihon Medi-Physics. NK’s institution reports receiving research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bayer, Lilly, GSK, and Adlai Nortye; NK has received invited speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Eli Lilly, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, and Eisai, and advisory board fees from Ono Pharmaceutical and Adlai Nortye. SB has received invited speaker fees from MSD, ONO Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Chugai Pharmaceutical. YI has received invited speaker fees from Daiichi Sankyo and MSD. NS has received invited speaker fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Merck Biopharma, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, and Medicon, and advisory board fees from Kyowa Kirin and Daiichi Sankyo. HSa’s institution reports receiving research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, and Asahi Kasei; HSa has received invited speaker fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and Yakult Honsha. KT has reported receiving invited speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Merck Biopharma, Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Novartis. HH’s institution has received research funding from Guardant Health Japan, IQVIA, Eisai, Syneos Health, EP-CRSU, EPS, Shionogi, Nippon Kayaku, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Sanofi, Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, SRL Medisearch, Janssen Pharmaceutical, PRA Health Sciences, CMIC, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer R&D Japan G.K., Ascent Development Services, Labcorp Development Japan, Eisai, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical, Bayer, and Pfizer Japan; HH has received invited speaker fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, Daiichi Sankyo, 3H Clinical Trial, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Amgen, MSD, Sysmex, Pfizer Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. TO’s department has reported receiving grants from MSD and Merck Biopharma; TO has received invited speaker fees from Eisai, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Bristol Myers Squibb, and advisory board fees from Eisai. YN has reported receiving personal honoraria as an invited speaker from Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eli Lilly. HSh has reported receiving an invited speaker fee from Rakuten Medical. HM’s institution has reported receiving grants from Abbvie, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo, DaiNippon Sumitomo, GSK, Insight, Kyowa-Kirin, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Nihon-Kayaku, Nihon-Shinyaku, Shionogi, Novartis, Sanofi, Teijin Pharma, Taiho, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda, Tsumura, and Yakult; HM has received personal honoraria as an invited speaker from Abbvie, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Daiichi-Sankyo Espha, Eisai, Kyowa-Kirin, Eli Lilly, Meiji Seika Pharma, Merck Biopharma, Nihon Servier, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Shionogi, Taiho, and Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

In this article, we highlight the evolution of a multimodal approach in the overall management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in India; present advances in technology (newer surgical techniques), novel medical and radiotherapy (RT) approaches; review their roles for an integrated approach for treating SCCHN and discuss the current role of immunotherapy in SCCHN. For locally advanced (LA) SCCHN, the multidisciplinary approach includes surgery followed by RT, with or without chemotherapy (CT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Improved surgical techniques of reconstruction and voice-preservation are being implemented. Advanced forms of high-precision conformal techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy are used to deliver highly conformal doses to tumors, sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Compared with RT alone, novel CT regimens and targeted therapeutic agents have the potential to improve locoregional control and survival and reduce treatment-induced toxicities. Several clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and quality of life benefits of adding cetuximab to RT regimens in LASCCHN. Studies have also suggested a cetuximab-related laryngeal preservation benefit. At progression, platinum-based CT combined with cetuximab (a monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody) is the only validated option available as the first-line therapy. Thus, an integrated multidisciplinary approach plays a key role in maximizing patient outcomes, reduction in treatment related morbidities that consequently impact quality of life of survivors.

There is increasing demand for improved production and purification systems for biosimilar or biobetter humanised monoclonal antibodies and animal production systems offer one such possibile option. Cetuximab, also known as ‘Erbitux’, is a humanised monoclonal antibody widely used in cancer therapy. We have previously reported on a genetically engineered goat system to produce cetuximab (gCetuximab) in milk. Herein we report that gCetuximab has similar bioactivity and pharamacokinetic properties compared with the commercial product produced in mammalian cell culture. In particular both forms have very similar efficacy in a HT29 colorectal cancer xenograft model alone or when conjugated to the toxin MMAE. This also demonstrates that the gCetuximab will be a viable vehicle for antibody drug conjugate based therapies. Taken together, this shows that the goat milk monoclonal antibody production system is an effective way of producing a biosimilar form of cetuximab.

Effective analgesic treatment for neuropathic pain remains an unmet need, so previous evidence that epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) provide unexpected rapid pain relief in a clinical setting points to a novel therapeutic opportunity. The present study utilises rodent models to address the cellular and molecular basis for the findings, focusing on primary sensory neurons because clinical pain relief is provided not only by small molecule EGFRIs, but also by the anti-EGFR antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab, which are unlikely to access the central nervous system in therapeutic concentrations. We report robust, rapid and dose-dependent analgesic effects of EGFRIs in two neuropathic pain models, matched by evidence with highly selective antibodies that expression of the EGFR (ErbB1 protein) is limited to small nociceptive afferent neurons. As other ErbB family members can heterodimerise with ErbB1, we investigated their distribution, showing consistent co-expression of ErbB2 but not ErbB3 or ErbB4, with ErbB1 in cell bodies of nociceptors, as well as providing evidence for direct molecular interaction of ErbB1 with ErbB2 in situ. Co-administration of selective ErbB1 and ErbB2 inhibitors produced clear evidence of greater-than-additive, synergistic analgesia; highlighting the prospect of a unique new combination therapy in which enhanced efficacy could be accompanied by minimisation of side-effects. Peripheral (intraplantar) administration of EGF elicited hypersensitivity only following nerve injury and this was reversed by local co-administration of selective inhibitors of either ErbB1 or ErbB2. Investigating how ErbB1 is activated in neuropathic pain, we found evidence for a role of Src tyrosine kinase, which can be activated by signals from inflammatory mediators, chemokines and cytokines during neuroinflammation. Considering downstream consequences of ErbB1 activation in neuropathic pain, we found direct recruitment to ErbB1 of an adapter for PI 3-kinase and Akt signalling together with clear Akt activation and robust analgesia from selective Akt inhibitors. The known Akt target and regulator of vesicular trafficking, AS160 was strongly phosphorylated at a perinuclear location during neuropathic pain in an ErbB1-, ErbB2- and Akt-dependent manner, corresponding to clustering and translocation of an AS160-partner, the vesicular chaperone, LRP1. Exploring whether neuronal ion channels that could contribute to hyperexcitability might be transported by this vesicular trafficking pathway we were able to identify Nav1.9, (Nav1.8) and Cav1.2 moving towards the plasma membrane or into proximal axonal locations – a process prevented by ErbB1 or Akt inhibitors. Overall these findings newly reveal both upstream and downstream signals to explain how ErbB1 can act as a signalling hub in neuropathic pain models and identify the trafficking of key ion channels to neuronal subcellular locations likely to contribute to hyperexcitability. The new concept of combined treatment with ErbB1 plus ErbB2 blockers is mechanistically validated as a promising strategy for the relief of neuropathic pain.

Introduction and background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been increasingly recognized as an immune suppressive malignancy. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI’s) in the context of recurrent/metastatic (R/M) setting anticipates the possible integration of immunotherapy into the therapeutic armamentarium of locally advanced disease. Durvalumab (DUR) is a humanized monoclonal IgG1, anti-PD-L1 antibody with promising data in R/M HNSCC. The aim of our study is to test the antitumor activity of a combined regimen incorporating an immune checkpoint inhibitor into a conventional bio-radiation strategy for the cure of unfavorable locally advanced HNSCC. Methods/design: In this open label, multi-center, single-arm, phase I/II study, enrolled patients will receive Radiotherapy (RT) (69.9 Gy/2.12 Gy in 33 fractions) with concurrent Cetuximab (CTX) (400 mg/m2 1 week before RT start followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly) and DUR (fixed dose of 1500 mg every 4 weeks starting from RT-CTX week 1) followed by adjuvant DUR (to a maximum of 6 months after completion of RT-CTX). Primary endpoint of the study is 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). A safety run-in is planned after the enrollment of first 12, 24 and 36 patients. Patients affected by high-risk (≥N2a or ≥T3, any N) larynx, hypopharynx and HPV negative oropharynx or HPV-positive oropharynx (≥T2, ≥N2b, ≥10 pack/years) will be eligible. Discussion: Conventional intensification strategies failed to provide any benefit for the cure of locally advanced HNSCC. For the still prevalent HPV-negative population and the high risk-HPV positive disease, there is an unmet need for alternative treatment paradigms. Potentially, the inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint may synergize with both CTX and RT through immunologic interplay, ultimately aiming to reverse the HNSCC-induced immune suppression. The DUCRO study will seek to demonstrate if such a strategy may be safe and active. Trial registration: NCT number: NCT03051906 Eudract number: 2016-004668-20

Background: Chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for localized oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemoradiotherapy. Methods: This non-randomised multicentre phase II trial recruited patients aged 18-75 with WHO performance status 0-2 having squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction, T2-4, N0-3, M0 not suitable for surgery. Chemotherapy was three 21-day cycles of fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 D1-5 and oxaliplatin D1 (cycle 1:130mg/m 2, cycle 2-3:85 mg/m 2). Radiotherapy was 50Gy in 2Gy/fraction, 5 days a week, concurrent with cycle 2 and 3 and weekly cetuximab. The primary objective was loco-regional control at one year. Results: 52 patients were included. 51 were eligible for toxicity and survival analysis and 46 for recurrence analysis. Full radiotherapy dose was delivered to 80%, 75% received all three cycles of chemotherapy and 75% received four or more doses of cetuximab. The most common related grade III-IV adverse events were gastro-intestinal(16), hypersensitivity(6) and infection(5). There were two drug-related deaths. Within six months from the end of treatment, six patients died from complications from fistulas. The loco-regional control rate at one year was 47.3%(95%CI 30.9%-62.1%). Overall survival at three years was 29.1%(95% CI 17.4-41.9%). Conclusions: Oxaliplatin and fluorouracil given concurrent with radiotherapy and cetuximab had an acceptable safety profile and showed a clinical response in patients with locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. However, the primary end-point was not met, and the addition of cetuximab to definitive chemoradiotherapy cannot be recommended

Despite recent molecular and immunological advancements, prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains poor. In this context, several retrospective and phase II studies suggested that after failure of an upfront anti-EGFR based regimen, a subset of patients can still benefit from further anti-EGFR blockade. Several translational studies involving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis demonstrated that cancer clones harboring mutations driving anti-EGFR resistance, which can arise under anti-EGFR agents selective pressure, often decay after anti-EGFR discontinuation potentially restoring sensitivity to this therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, several retrospective analyses and a recent prospective trial demonstrated that ctDNA RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients are those benefitting the most from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Indeed, in molecularly selected patients, anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy achieved up to 30 % response rate, with a progression free survival longer than 4 months and an overall survival longer than 1 year, which favorably compared with other standard therapeutic options available for heavily pretreated patients. Anti-EGFR is also well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities compared to the upfront setting. However, several open questions remain to be addressed towards a broader applicability of anti-EGFR strategy in the everyday clinical practice such as the identification of the best rechallenge regimen, the right placement in mCRC therapeutic algorithm, the best ctDNA screening panel. In our systematic review, we revised available data from clinical trials assessing anti-EGFR rechallenge activity in chemo-refractory mCRC patients, discussing as well potential future scenarios and development to implement this therapeutic approach. Particularly, we discussed the role of ctDNA as a safe, timely and comprehensive tool to refine patient's selection and the therapeutic index of anti-EGFR rechallenge., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: DC report receiving travel grants from Sanofi, BMS and Merck KGaA; GM reported received honoraria from COR2ED; ASB reported being an advisory board member for Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, and Servier; SS reported being an advisory board member for Agenus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CheckmAb, Daiichi- Sankyo, Guardant Health, Menarini, Merck, Novartis, Roche-Genentech and Seagen; NF reported serving in the steering committees for Novartis, Ipsen, Merck Serono, MSD, Pharmacyclics, Incyte, Halozyme, Roche, Astellas, Pfizer, FivePrime and BeiGene and serving as advisory board member and a public speaker for Novartis, Ipsen, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Advanced Accelerator Applications, MSD, Sanofi-Aventis and Wren Laboratories Europe; AC reports fees paid to his institution as an invited speaker from Amgen, Foundation Medicine, Merck Serono and Roche; fees paid to his institution for advisory board membership from Amgen, AnHeart Therapeutics, Merck Serono, Roche and Transgene; personal fees for editorial roles as Associate Editor for Annals of Oncology and ESMO Open and as Editor for Cancer Treatment Reviews; institutional funding as principal investigator (PI) from Actuate Therapeutic, Adaptimmune, Amcure, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), FibroGen, Genentech, Lilly, MedImmune, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Natera, Novartis, Servier, Sierra Oncology and Takeda; he reports a non-remunerated role as General and Scientific Director of INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cetuximab (CTX) is a potent chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody (mAb) approved worldwide for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Among the various biological and physical analyses performed for full study on this biopharmaceutic, the determination of the concentration preparations throughout manufacturing and subsequent handling in hospital is particularly relevant. In the present work, the study and validation of a method for quantifying intact CTX by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection ((RP)HPLC/DAD) is presented. With that end, we checked the performance of a chromatographic method for quantifying CTX and conducted a study to validate the method as stability-indicating in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines (ICH) for biotechnological drugs; therefore, we evaluated linearity, accuracy, precision, detection and quantification limits, robustness and system suitability. The specificity of the method and the robustness of the mAb formulation against external stress factors were estimated by comprehensive chromatographic analysis by subjecting CTX to several informative stress conditions. As demonstrated, the method is rapid, accurate, and reproducible for CTX quantification. It was also successfully used to quantify CTX in a long-term stability study performed under hospital conditions.

In late 2020, an outbreak of Tembusu virus (TMUV)-associated disease occurred in a 45-day-old white Roman geese flock in Taiwan. Here, we present the identification and isolation of a novel goose-origin TMUV strain designated as NTU/C225/2020. The virus was successfully isolated using minimal-pathogen-free duck embryos. Phylogenetic analysis of the polyprotein gene showed that NTU/C225/2020 clustered together with the earliest isolates from Malaysia and was most closely related to the first Taiwanese TMUV strain, TP1906. Genomic analysis revealed significant amino acid variations among TMUV isolates in NS1 and NS2A protein regions. In the present study, we characterized the NTU/C225/2020 culture in duck embryos, chicken embryos, primary duck embryonated fibroblasts, and DF-1 cells. All host systems were susceptible to NTU/C225/2020 infection, with observable lesions. In addition, animal experiments showed that the intramuscular inoculation of NTU/C225/2020 resulted in growth retardation and hyperthermia in day-old chicks. Gross lesions in the infected chicks included hepatomegaly, hyperemic thymus, and splenomegaly. Viral loads and histopathological damage were displayed in various tissues of both inoculated and naïve co-housed chicks, confirming the direct chick-to-chick contact transmission of TMUV. This is the first in vivo study of a local TMUV strain in Taiwan. Our findings provide essential information for TMUV propagation and suggest a potential risk of disease outbreak in chicken populations., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have shown clinical efficacy in colorectal cancer and other solid cancers. Enhancing the effector functions of these anti-EGFR mAbs is believed to be a valuable approach to achieve improved efficacy in clinical setting. Here, we report the development of an effector function-enhanced antibody by rhamnose (Rha) functionalization. Cetuximab, a human/mouse chimeric anti-EGFR mAb, was selected and site-specifically conjugated with Rha haptens. The obtained cetuximab-Rha conjugate was shown to be able to selectively redirect amounts of endogenous anti-Rha antibodies onto EGFR-positive solid tumor cells and thereby provide more Fc domains to achieve enhancement of effector functions including complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP). Particularly, CDC, one powerful cell killing mechanism which is inactive in cetuximab, was dramatically improved. This study demonstrates the potential of rhamnose-modified antibody for EGFR-positive solid tumor immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the current recommended option for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Resistance to first-generation TKIs led to the development of second- and third-generation TKIs with improved clinical outcomes. However, sequential administration of TKIs has led to the emergence of new EGFR resistance mutations and persistent tumor cell survival. This evidence highlights the potential role of EGFR in transducing growth signals in NSCLC tumor cells. Therefore, dual inhibition of EGFR using combinations of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and EGFR-TKIs may offer a unique treatment strategy to suppress tumor cell growth. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the benefits of dual blockade of EGFR using anti-EGFR mAbs coupled with EGFR-TKIs in overcoming treatment resistance in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, a single treatment option may not result in the same clinical benefits in all patients with acquired resistance. Biomarkers, including EGFR overexpression, EGFR gene copy number, EGFR and KRAS mutations, and circulating tumor DNA, have been associated with improved clinical efficacy with anti-EGFR mAbs in patients with NSCLC and acquired resistance. Further investigation of biomarkers may allow patient selection for those who could benefit from anti-EGFR mAbs in combination with EGFR-TKIs. This review summarizes findings of recent studies of anti-EGFR mAbs in combination with EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, as well as clinical evidence for potential biomarkers towards personalized targeted medicine., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Therapeutic antibodies have shown little efficacy in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Tumor desmoplasia, hypovascularity, and poor perfusion result in insufficient tumor cell exposure, contributing to treatment failure. Smoothened inhibitors of hedgehog signaling (sHHi) increase PDAC tumor permeability, perfusion, and drug delivery, and provide a tool to develop a quantitative, mechanistic understanding as to how the temporal dynamics of tumor priming can impact intratumor distribution of monoclonal antibodies (mAb). A linked pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed to integrate the plasma and tumor PK of a sHHi priming agent with its effects upon downstream stromal biomarkers Gli1, hyaluronic acid, and interstitial fluid pressure in PDAC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors. In parallel, in situ tumor concentrations of cetuximab (CTX: anti-epidermal growth factor receptor; EGFR) were quantified as a marker for tumor delivery of mAb or antibody-drug conjugates. A minimal, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model was constructed to link sHHi effects upon mechanistic effectors of tumor barrier compromise with the intratumor distribution of CTX, and CTX occupancy of EGFR in tumors. Integration of the mPBPK model of mAb deposition and intratumor distribution with the PK/PD model of tumor responses to priming not only identified physiological parameters that are critical for tumor antibody distribution, but also provides insight into dosing regimens that could achieve maximal tumor disposition of therapeutic antibodies under conditions of transient PDAC tumor permeability barrier compromise that mechanistically-diverse tumor priming strategies may achieve., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) showed tremendous therapeutic potential in degrading several oncoproteins including undruggable proteins. PROTACs are bifunctional molecules where one-part binds to target protein while the other end recruits protein degradation machinery. With the unveiling advancements in the field of PROTACs, we explored a combinatorial approach by developing antibody-based PROTAC (ABTAC) which may effectively degrade one of the key oncoprotein driving proliferation and progression of cancer - Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The objective of current research was to synthesize and characterize an EGFR degrading ABTAC for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cetuximab and pomalidomide (E3 ligase recruiting ligand) were conjugated using lysine conjugation and copper free azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) click chemistry. Analytical characterization using reverse-phase liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry suggested conjugation of five E3-ligase inhibitor molecules/antibody. Nearly 10-30 folds reduction in IC 50 was observed with ABTAC in HCC827 (EGFR sensitive) and H1650 (EGFR resistant) cells compared to cetuximab. Multicellular 3D spheroid assay strongly suggested that ABTAC induced significant apoptosis and also inhibited cell proliferation compared to control and antibody alone. Circular dichroism and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) confirmed minor alterations in the structure and receptor binding efficacy of the antibody post-conjugation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have no competing interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cetuximab is a standard of care therapy for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) advanced colorectal cancer. Limited data suggest a wide variation in cetuximab plasma concentrations after standard dosing regimens. We correlated cetuximab plasma concentrations with survival and toxicity., Methods: The CO. 20 study randomized patients with RAS WT advanced colorectal cancer in a 1:1 ratio to cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 intravenously followed by weekly maintenance of 250 mg/m 2 , plus brivanib 800 mg orally daily or placebo. Blood samples obtained at week 5 precetuximab treatment were analyzed by ELISA. Patients were grouped into tertiles based on plasma cetuximab concentrations. Cetuximab concentration tertiles were correlated with survival outcomes and toxicity. Patient demographic and biochemical parameters were evaluated as co-variables., Results: Week 5 plasma cetuximab concentrations were available for 591 patients (78.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 months and 7.8 months for patients in the highest (T3) and lowest tertiles (T1) respectively. On multivariable analysis, plasma cetuximab concentration was associated with OS (HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.83, P < .001, T3 vs. T1), and a trend towards progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.02, P = .07, T3 vs. T1). There was no association between cetuximab concentration and skin toxicity or diarrhea., Conclusion: The standard cetuximab dosing regimen may not be optimal for all patients. Further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to optimize cetuximab dosing given the potential improvement in OS., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to develop cetuximab (CTX) functionalized albumin nanoparticles (ALB-NPs) of oleanolic acid for EGFR targeted lung cancer therapy. The molecular docking methodology has been applied for a selection of suitable nanocarrier. Various physicochemical parameters like particle size, polydispersity, zeta potential, morphology, entrapment efficiency, and in-vitro drug release of all the ALB-NPs were analyzed. Furthermore, the in-vitro qualitative and quantitative cellular uptake study revealed that higher uptake of CTX conjugated ALB-NPs than nontargeted ALB-NPs in A549 cells. The in-vitro MTT assay revealed that the IC 50 value of CTX-OLA-ALB-NPs (4.34 ± 1.90 μg/mL) was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) than OLA-ALB-NPs (13.87 ± 1.28 μg/mL) in A-549 cells. CTX-OLA-ALB-NPs caused apoptosis in A-549 cells at concentrations equivalent to its IC 50 value and blocked the cell cycle in the G0/G1 phases. The hemocompatibility, histopathology and lung safety study confirmed the biocompatibility of the developed NPs. In vivo ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging confirmed the targeted delivery of the NPs to lung cancer. The findings demonstrated that CTX-OLA-ALB-NPs have potential for site-specific delivery of OLA for effective and targeted therapy of lung carcinoma., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Cetuximab (Cmab) is a molecularly targeted monoclonal antibody drug for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), although cetuximab resistance is a serious challenge. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is an established marker for many epithelial tumors, while the soluble EpCAM extracellular domain (EpEX) functions as a ligand for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We investigated the expression of EpCAM in HNSC, its involvement in Cmab action, and the mechanism by which soluble EpEX activated EGFR and played key roles in Cmab resistance., Materials and Methods: We first examined EPCAM expression in HNSCs and its clinical significance by searching gene expression array databases. We then examined the effects of soluble EpEX and Cmab on intracellular signaling and Cmab efficacy in HNSC cell lines (HSC-3 and SAS)., Results: EPCAM expression was found to be enhanced in HNSC tumor tissues compared to normal tissues, and the enhancement was correlated with stage progression and prognosis. Soluble EpEX activated the EGFR-ERK signaling pathway and nuclear translocation of EpCAM intracellular domains (EpICDs) in HNSC cells. EpEX resisted the antitumor effect of Cmab in an EGFR expression-dependent manner., Conclusion: Soluble EpEX activates EGFR to increase Cmab resistance in HNSC cells. The EpEX-activated Cmab resistance in HNSC is potentially mediated by the EGFR-ERK signaling pathway and the EpCAM cleavage-induced nuclear translocation of EpICD. High expression and cleavage of EpCAM are potential biomarkers for predicting the clinical efficacy and resistance to Cmab., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)