Search

Introduction: Pre-analytics involves handling and processing of microbiopsy and surgical specimen. It is critical for the preservation of morphology and the integrity of molecular markers, which are paramount as prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer. Although pre-analytical variables in breast cancer are codified by national and international guidelines, there is currently no data on their actual endorsement in clinical practice among Breast Units (BU)., Materials and Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent by e-mail by Senonetwork Italia, a no-profit organization representing the multidisciplinary network of BU in Italy. The questionnaire involved twenty-four questions concerning critical issues related to the average time and transport temperature of the samples, monitoring of warm and cold ischemia, average fixation time for biopsies and surgical specimens, inking of the margins, and radiography of the operating sample., Results: Forty-nine of 113 affiliated BU (43%), involved in the management of 44% of all breast cancer treated every year in Italy, answered the questionnaire. More than 90% of the BU reported a biopsy/VABB fixation time between 6 and 24 h. Only 41% of the Centers received the fresh operative sample to be sectioned immediately, 20% used the vacuum method and the sample arrived in the laboratory within 24-72 h. Delay in sectioning the sample was reported in as many as 40% of BU, while hot and cold ischemia time was monitored in only 4.2% and 6.2% of BU, respectively., Conclusion: Critical issues on pre-analytics are reported by the majority of dedicated BU in Italy. This represents a major challenge regarding quality of care, and improvements are needed in order to obtain valid and reproducible results of prognostic and predictive factors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest in regard to the content of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer treatment has deeply changed in the last decades, since clinical and oncological cure cannot be achieved without patient's satisfaction in term of aesthetic outcomes. Several methods have been proposed to objectively assess these results. However, Italian breast centers have not yet agreed on measurable, reproducible and validated aesthetic outcome indicators to monitor their performance., Methods: The study was designed and conducted by Senonetwork, a not-for-profit association of Italian breast centers. Ten breast centers were selected based on specific eligibility criteria. This multicentre observational prospective study recruited 6515 patients with diagnosis of in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent breast surgery in the years 2013-2016. Thirteen indicators of aesthetic results and of related quality of care were analyzed. Data collection and analysis were conducted using a common study database., Results: On average, seven out of ten centers were able to collect data on the proposed indicators with a proportion of missing values < 25%. By expert consensus based on study results, some seven indicators have been defined as "mandatory" while the remaining six have been defined as "recommended" because they require further refinement before they can be proposed for monitoring aesthetic outcomes or because there are doubts on the feasibility of data collection. The minimum standard is reached for 5 of 13 indicators. This finding and the wide range between centers reveal that there is ample room for improvement., Conclusions: From the present study useful measurable aesthetic parameters have emerged, leading to the definition of target objectives that breast centers can use for benchmarking and improvement of quality of care., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

This article is an update of the requirements of a specialist breast centre, produced by EUSOMA and endorsed by ECCO as part of Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) programme, and ESMO. To meet aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this article, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nipple sparing mastectomy is deemed surgically and oncologically safe based on a long lasting literature data from reviews of single institution series. This study aims at evaluating surgical and oncological outcomes of NSM on a large multi-institutional scale, by means of the Italian National registry., Methods: In July 2011 a panel of Italian specialists agreed upon and designed a National database of NSM. Centers with at least 150 cancers per year and following the National follow-up schedule guidelines could participate inserting any NSM case performed, retrospectively and prospectively from that moment on. In March 2015 analysis of data was accomplished. Dataset for this study consists of cases performed in the period between January 1st 2009 and December 31st 2014., Results: 913 Women were included in the analysis, for a total of 1006 procedures. Prophylactic mastectomies were 124 (12.3%). MRI utilization increased over time. NSM failure rate, with NAC removal for any reason was 11.5%. NAC necrosis rate was 4.8%. Larger skin-flap necrosis rate was 2.3%. Major surgical complications rate was 4.4%. Oncological outcomes were calculated among primitive EBC cases only: locoregional recurrences rate was 2.9%, NAC recurrence 0.7%. Systemic recurrence rate was 1.0%. Five deaths (0.7%) were registered., Conclusions: More than 10% of NSM procedures are prophylactic mastectomies. MRI is gaining more importance over time. Surgical and oncological results show that NSM is effective. This National multicentric analysis enables a comparison of results with no geographical differences and a "safe" state of the art of NSM in Italy., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Nipple discharge (ND) is a common symptom with a reported incidence of 2% to 5% of patients referred to breast cancer clinics. Approximately 90% of ND is of benign etiology. An underlying carcinoma is present with a rate of 6% to 21%. This is more frequent if it is associated with clinical or radiologic abnormality. ND after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a rare event as the whole retroareolar glandular tissue is usually completely removed with mastectomy. ND is otherwise possible if a small amount of tissue is accidentally left by the surgeon or with the aim of reducing the risk of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) necrosis. This condition can be of concern as it may imply a local recurrence and therefore implicate NAC removal. Herein we report a case of a ND in an NSM in which only a selective duct excision allowed NAC preservation., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aims: We conducted a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the impact of age on women aged less than 35 years affected by breast cancer., Materials and Methods: Between January 1972 and December 2006, 346 patients aged less than 35 years underwent adjuvant treatment at Florence University. The mean age of the patient population was 32 years (range 22-35): 76 patients were under 30 years old, the remaining were above 30 years old., Results: In our series, 215 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy to whole breast after conservative surgery, 131 patients underwent mastectomy without subsequent radiation therapy and 323 patients had lymphadenectomy; 191 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, 73 with anthracycline-containing regimen. With a median time of 2.5 years (range 6 months to 27.6 years) local relapses were observed in 67 cases (19.4%). At the multivariate analysis of local disease-free survival, ductal and ductal plus lobular histotypes, having more than 3 positive nodes, and age emerged as independent significant relapse predictors (p = 0.018, p = 0.0005, p = 0.003 and p = 0.024, respectively). For the DSS analysis, the median follow-up was 6.8 years (range 0.6-36.7 years). At the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.0038), positive nodes (p = 0.0035) and distant metastases (p < 0.0001) resulted to be independent death predictors. Patients younger than 30 had a worse prognosis. At the univariate analysis also local relapse resulted to be statistically significant (p = 0.0004)., Conclusions: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy seems to improve the outcome of these patients. However, there is an urgent need for tailored treatment investigations within the framework of randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Aim: The aim of the current study is to identify a subgroup of patients with breast cancer who have a low risk of local recurrence after conservative surgery in order to avoid radiotherapy treatment., Methods: A group of 472 patients underwent conservative surgery without radiotherapy, and it was compared to a second group of 755 patients with similar characteristics, but who had received radiotherapy treatment (RT) after conservative surgery., Results: Breast relapse's univariate analysis demonstrated statistical significance for the following factors: radiotherapy treatment, clinical stage, pathological stage, positive axillary nodes and tumour grading. Different results were obtained studying breast relapse. In the no-RT group breast relapse was 10.6% while in the irradiated group it was 3.4%. The breast relapse incidence decreases as the age of the patients increases especially over 75 years of age., Conclusions: In conclusion, there is clinical evidence of avoiding adjuvant radiotherapy for patients over 75 years with T1-T2 cancer treated with quadrantectomy with a clear excision margin.

Background: The need to dissect axillary nodes in patients with early breast cancer and clinically negative axilla remains controversial. The aim of the study was to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy (RT) in reducing axillary metastases in patients with early breast cancer who did not receive axillary dissection., Patients and Methods: From 1995 to 1998, 435 patients over 45 years old with breast cancer up to 1.2 cm and no palpable axillary nodes were randomized 214 to breast conservation without axillary treatment and 221 to breast conservation plus axillary RT., Results: After a median follow-up of 63 months, overt axillary metastases were fewer than expected: three cases in the no axillary treatment group (1.5%) and one in the RT group (0.5%). Expected cases were 43 in the no axillary treatment group and 10 in the RT group. Rates of distant metastases and local failures were low, and 5-year disease free survival was 96.0% (95% confidence interval, 94.1%-97.9%) without significant differences between the two arms., Conclusions: This study suggests that occult axillary metastases might never become clinically overt and axillary dissection might be avoided in patients with small carcinomas and a clinically negative axilla. Axillary RT seems to protect the patients from axillary recurrence almost completely.

The European Society of Surgical Oncology is actively involved in the promotion of a high standard of surgical oncology throughout Europe. Such an ambition involves recognition of Centres of Excellence in the management of cancer patients throughout Europe. These centres have a multi-disciplinary system involved in the total care of patients with cancer and are concerned with the delivery of care to the highest available standards. It is accepted that not all patients with cancer can, nor should, necessarily be treated in such highly specialized centres. Yet all cancer patients should be guaranteed a high standard of care. High surgical standards can be ensured if surgeons treating cancer are trained in specialist centres and, when in independent practice, follow established guidelines or protocols of treatment. In common with many national surgical oncology societies, the European Society of Surgical Oncology is in the process of establishing good practice guidelines in the treatment of solid tumours. This document on the management of symptomatic breast cancer is the first of a series of guidelines to be proposed by ESSO. It draws heavily on excellent documents already in existence from the British Association of Surgical Oncology and from the Danish Breast Cancer Co-Operative Group. It is hoped that this document will be sufficiently clear and purposeful to be of help to the individual surgeon and yet sufficiently flexible to allow it to be adopted in the different medical systems throughout Europe.

A series of 59 phyllodes tumors of the breast was retrospectively reviewed (average follow-up = 3.9 years). Clinical features (age, size of tumor) and diagnostic tests (palpation, mammography, sonography and cytology) were found to be inaccurate in predicting benign (n = 22), borderline (n = 12) or malignant (n = 25) histological type. Limited surgery was associated with a relatively high proportion of local recurrence (enucleation/enucleoresection = 3/5, wide resection = 12/30) compared with mastectomy (2/24). No significant association was observed between the probability of local recurrence and patient's age, histological type or lesion size. Although the study confirms that limited surgery may cure phyllodes tumor, careful follow-up of all patients is needed, since no reliable risk factors for recurrence are available. In malignant cases, axillary node involvement was nil and distant metastases were infrequently observed (3/25). Axillary dissection and search for asymptomatic metastases is not recommended.

We report on 156 consecutive cases of in situ ductal carcinoma (DCIS) of the breast observed from 1968 to 1988. The relative frequency of DCIS was much higher in screened, with respect to self-referred, women and a significant association of DCIS with younger age was observed. The combined use of mammography and physical examination identified 138 of 156 total DCIS cases as suspicious. Mammography, physical examination or cytology (of nipple discharge or needle aspirate) were the only tests to provide suspicious evidence in 35, 22 and four cases respectively. DCIS was a relatively unexpected surgical finding in 13 apparently benign cases. Different surgical options were recorded in the study period but a temporal trend in favour of conservative surgery was evident. Subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral breast cancer was recorded in seven and six cases respectively. Death from breast cancer occurred in five cases, all of whom had contralateral or subsequent ipsilateral infiltrating cancer. This figure confirms the high curability of DCIS if local control is achieved.

We report on the possible diagnostic and prognostic role of circulating immune complexes (CIC) determination in breast cancer. A sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 90% were observed in a case-control study of 15 cancers and 25 noncancer healthy controls. A direct correlation of CIC level to the presence and probably to the entity of the tumor mass was assessed by comparing preoperative to postoperative CIC determinations in cancer cases: CIC levels were significantly lower after tumor removal. These preliminary results suggest further studies on the use of CIC determination in the follow-up of breast cancer for the early diagnosis of recurrent disease.

Many biological substances are commonly used as markers for malignant neoplasms, but no single marker with high specificity and sensitivity has been found for cancer to date. In this study we evaluated simultaneously the serum levels of five biomarkers of malignancy: phosphohexose-isomerase (PHI), creatine kinase isoenzyme BB (CK-BB), alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), beta 2-microglobulin (BMG), and ferritin. In 89 female patients with breast lesions, we identified 30 benign lesions, 32 primary breast cancers, and 27 metastatic breast cancers (pulmonary and/or bone metastases). Each marker was assayed individually and in a combination and was compared with other markers. The results revealed that in benign lesions only 7% had PHI values higher than our cut-off limit value, while 3% had elevated values of AAG, BMG, and ferritin. In primary breast cancer we discovered pathological values of CK-BB and AAG in 71%, of PHI in 69%, of BMG in 50%, and of ferritin in 47%. Metastatic disease was associated with elevated values in 88% of CK-BB, in 70% of PHI and AAG, and in only 55% of BMG and ferritin. Combined pathological values for primary and metastatic breast cancer were 79% for CK-BB, 71% for AAG, 70% for PHI, and only 55% for BMG and ferritin. These data were assessed by the Student t test, which revealed for each marker a significant capacity (P less than 0.01) to discriminate between benign lesions and neoplastic diseases. The same capacity to distinguish between primary and metastatic cancer was obtained by the simultaneous use of three markers (CK-BB, PHI, and AAG).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)