Search

Background: Cardiac retransplantation is a controversial procedure due to the disparity between donor heart demand and supply., Methods: Of 7,290 patients undergoing primary cardiac transplantation between January 1990 and December 1999 at 42 institutions contributing to the Cardiac Transplant Research Database (CTRD), 106 patients later underwent a second and 1 patient a third cardiac transplant procedure., Results: The actuarial freedom from retransplantation was 99.2% and 96.8% at 1 and 10 years, respectively. Reasons for retransplantation included early graft failure (n = 34), acute cardiac rejection (n = 15), coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV, n = 39), non-specific graft failure (n = 7), and miscellaneous (n = 10). The only risk factor associated with retransplantation was younger age, reflecting the policy of preferential retransplantation of younger patients. Survival after retransplantation was inferior to that after primary transplantation (56% and 38% at 1 and 5 years, respectively). Risk factors associated with death after retransplantation included retransplantation for acute rejection (p = 0.0005), retransplantation for early graft failure (p = 0.03), and use of a female donor (p = 0.005). Survival after retransplantation for acute rejection was poorest (32% and 8% at 1 and 5 years, respectively) followed by retransplantation for early graft failure (50% and 39% at 1 and 5 years, respectively). Survival after retransplantation for CAV has steadily improved with successive eras., Conclusions: The results of retransplantation for acute rejection and early graft failure are poor enough to suggest that this option is not advisable. However, retransplantation for CAV is currently associated with satisfactory survival and should continue to be offered to selected patients.

Background: Previous studies of allograft rejection have focused on early episodes and risk factors from pretransplant variables., Methods: This multiinstitutional study compared early (< 1 year) and late (> 1 year) rejection episodes and risk factors for recurrent rejection from variables both before and after transplantation among 1251 patients who underwent primary heart transplantation and available follow-up of greater than 1 year., Results: There were a total of 1882 rejection episodes over a mean follow-up of 26 +/- 0.3 months. The hazard function (instantaneous risk per patient per month) peaked at 1 month followed by a low constant risk of rejection after 12 months. By multivariable analysis, the most dominant risk factors for recurrent rejection during the first posttransplantation year were a shorter time interval since transplantation and a shorter time since a previous rejection episode. Other factors included young age, female gender, female donor, positive cytomegalovirus serology, prior infections, and OKT3 induction. In contrast, after the first year, the dominant risk factors for rejection were a greater number of rejections during the first year and the presence of prior cytomegalovirus infections., Conclusions: These data show a striking time dependency for rejection episodes among heart transplant recipients. Factors that increase risk for rejection in the first year differ from risk factors for rejection in subsequent years. These data suggest that it may be possible to tailor rejection surveillance protocols and immunosuppression intensity, according to specific patient and time-related risk factors.

To better understand the phenomenon of acute rejection in the current era of heart transplantation, complete rejection data (918 rejection episodes) from 25 institutions were analyzed for all 911 patients undergoing primary heart transplantation between January 1, 1990, and July 1, 1991. During a mean follow-up of 8.1 months (maximum, 18 months), 54% of the patients had one or more rejection episodes. The mean cumulative number of rejection episodes per patient was 0.8 at 3 months, 1.10 at 6 months, and 1.3 at 12 months after transplantation. By univariate analysis, female donor hearts (irrespective of recipient sex) (p < 0.01) and the use of induction therapy (p < 0.01) were associated with greater cumulative rejection frequency. By multivariate analysis, younger donor age and female donor gender were risk factors for earlier rejection. Solution of the multivariate equation predicted an 85% probability of rejection at 1 month for a 5-year-old female with a female donor and 50% for a 50-year-old man with a male donor. Inferences: (1) In the current era, over 40% of patients appear to be free of rejection during the first year after transplantation. (2) Younger recipient age and female donors are associated with earlier onset of allograft rejection, but the precise immunologic basis for these observations remains unknown. (3) In this experience, induction therapy did not delay the onset of first rejection nor did it reduce the cumulative number of rejection episodes. Further studies are indicated to examine the need for induction therapy.

A patient with rheumatoid disease initially had the physical findings of isolated tricuspid stenosis. Postmortem examination demonstrated adhesive pericarditis with localized hemopericardium which compressed the atrioventricular groove in the area of the tricuspid valve. Historical, physical, electrocardiographic, and cardiac catheterization features which suggested the diagnosis are discussed.