Search

Research Question: What is the intra- and inter-centre reliability in embryo grading performed according to the Istanbul Consensus across several IVF clinics?, Design: Forty Day 3 embryos and 40 blastocysts were photographed on three focal planes. Senior and junior embryologists from 65 clinics were invited to grade them according to the Istanbul Consensus (Study Phase I). All participants then attended interactive training where a panel of experts graded the same embryos (Study Phase II). Finally, a second set of pictures was sent to both embryologists and experts for a blinded evaluation (Study Phase III). Intra-centre reliability was reported for Study Phase I as Cohen's kappa between senior and junior embryologists; inter-centre reliability was instead calculated between senior/junior embryologists and experts in Study Phase I versus III to outline improvements after training (i.e. upgrade of Cohen's kappa category according to Landis and Koch)., Results: Thirty-six embryologists from 18 centres participated (28% participation rate). The intra-centre reliability was (i) substantial (0.63) for blastomere symmetry (range -0.02 to 1.0), (ii) substantial (0.72) for fragmentation (range 0.29-1.0), (iii) substantial (0.66) for blastocyst expansion (range 0.19-1.0), (iv) moderate (0.59) for inner cell mass quality (range 0.07-0.92), (v) moderate (0.56) for trophectoderm quality (range 0.01-0.97). The inter-centre reliability showed an overall improvement from Study Phase I to III, from fair (0.21-0.4) to moderate (0.41-0.6) for all parameters under analysis, except for blastomere fragmentation among senior embryologists, which was already moderate before training., Conclusions: Intra-centre reliability was generally moderate/substantial, while inter-centre reliability was just fair. The interactive training improved it to moderate, hence this workflow was deemed helpful. The establishment of external quality assessment services (e.g. UK NEQAS) and the avant-garde of artificial intelligence might further improve the reliability of this key practice for embryo selection., (Copyright © 2021 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This study evaluated whether anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was differentially expressed in cumulus (CC) and granulosa (GC) cells from large antral and pre-ovulatory follicles collected from individual follicles in women undergoing in-vitro maturation (IVM) or IVF treatment. Expression studies of AMH, AMH receptor 2, FSH receptor, aromatase and androgen receptor were performed in CC in IVM patients where cumulus-oocyte-complex had expanded, CC in IVM patients where cumulus-oocyte-complex remained compacted, GC from immature follicles and CC and GC from IVF patients. Microarray data on corresponding GC and CC from follicles from IVF patients was included. AMH expression was significantly higher in CC than in GC from both mature and immature follicles and in CC from immature follicles than in CC from pre-ovulatory follicles from IVF patients (P < 0.05). AMH expression was significantly higher in CC that remained compacted compared with those that had expanded (P < 0.008). AMH was correlated to the expression of FSH receptor, androgen receptor and AMH receptor 2 but not to aromatase expression. The expression pattern of AMH receptor 2 reflected that of AMH. AMH may exert intrafollicular functions even in human large antral and pre-ovulatory follicles and may be related to follicular health., (Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This study was designed to determine if the efficiency of in-vitro maturation (IVM) in women with normal ovaries can be improved by gonadotrophin administration. 400 women were randomly allocated in four groups: group A, non-primed cycles; group B, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)-primed cycles; group C, FSH-primed cycles; and group D, FSH- plus HCG-primed cycles. There were significant differences in the IVM rate among the groups. In groups where HCG was used, the overall maturation rate was higher (57.9% in group B and 77.4% in group D; 48.4% in group A and 50.8% in group C) and the percentage of total available metaphase II-stage oocytes was higher (60.4% in group B and 82.1% in group D; 48.4% in group A and 50.8% in group C). The overall clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (CPR) was 18.3% and the implantation rate (IR) was 10.6%. There was a difference in CPR among the groups: group D (29.9%) versus group A (15.3%), P = 0.023; group D versus group B (7.6%), P < 0.0001; group D versus group C (17.3%), P = 0.046. The results of this study are clearly in favour of FSH plus HCG priming. FSH priming and HCG priming alone showed no significant effects on clinical outcome.

The success of reproductive technologies is facilitated by the cryopreservation of embryos and gametes. In Italy, where legislation prohibits zygote and embryo cryopreservation, clinics have extensively introduced oocyte cryopreservation. Two different strategies of oocyte cryopreservation are available: slow freezing or ultrarapid cooling (vitrification). Although the results are very encouraging with both methods, there is still controversy regarding both the procedure itself and the most suitable method to use. This study reports the routine application of the two different oocyte cryopreservation methods in programmes running in two consecutive periods. The study centre carried out 286 thawing cycles for a total of 1348 thawed oocytes cryopreserved by the slow-freezing method and 59 warming cycles for a total of 285 warmed oocytes cryopreserved by vitrification. Comparison of the outcomes obtained with the slow-freezing method versus vitrification in women who underwent IVF for infertility showed survival, fertilization, pregnancy and implantation rates of 57.9% versus 78.9% (P < 0.0001), 64.6% versus 72.8% (P = 0.027), 7.6% versus 18.2% (P = 0.021) and 4.3% versus 9.3% (P = 0.043) respectively. These results suggest that oocyte vitrification is associated with a better outcome than the slow-freezing method.

The in-vitro maturation protocol (IVM) is an intriguing tool in assisted reproduction since it omits the side-effects of drug stimulation and reduces the cost of the entire procedure, both in terms of time and patient/society costs. In the Biogenesi Reproductive Medicine Centre, the IVM technique has been applied for more than 3 years, obtaining successful results in terms of maturation and fertilization rates, number of pregnancies and healthy babies born. At present, IVM is widely accepted in polycystic ovary and polycystic ovarian syndrome patients but its application in other women is still controversial. This study has been carried out in order to determine the efficiency of unstimulated IVM in women with morphologically and endocrinologically normal ovaries. Body mass index, basal FSH and oestradiol concentrations, antral follicle count, endometrial thickness and lead follicle size were correlated with the outcome of the procedure so as to obtain useful criteria to select women with regular cycles for an IVM technique. It was found that basal oestradiol concentration, FSH concentration and antral follicle count are useful criteria in deciding whether to start and continue the procedure, while lead follicle size and endometrial thickness are important criteria in deciding the timing of oocyte retrieval.

In March 2004, a new law was introduced in Italy to regulate assisted reproduction; at present it is impossible to use more than a maximum of three oocytes per IVF cycle, nor can embryos or prezygotes (2PN cells) be selected or cryopreserved. The prohibitions introduced by the new law have, on the one hand, reduced the expectations of success of current techniques and, on the other hand, stimulated clinicians and embryologists to work on new therapeutic strategies so as to offer the highest chances of success with the lowest risks. In-vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes fits very well with these new requirements: ovarian stimulation is avoided and the handling of spare oocytes is facilitated. The IVM protocol is an intriguing alternative to conventional IVF techniques, since it removes the side-effects of drug stimulation, especially ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and it also reduces the costs of the entire procedure, both in terms of 'time consumption' and 'patient/society costs for drugs'. In the authors' IVF centre the IVM technique has been used for more than a year, with significant success in terms of maturation and fertilization rates, percentage of embryo transfers, number of pregnancies and, finally, healthy babies born.