Search

In rats, hormonal fluctuations during the estrus cycle may have numerous behavioral and neurobiological consequences. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of estrus cycles and citalopram on behavior, ultrasonic vocalizations, anxiety levels, and c-fos expression in rats. With this aim, the rats were grouped into two: (1) a control group (n=16) and (2) a citalopram group (n=16), which received daily intraperitoneal 20mg/kg citalopram from baseline (D0) to the 10th day (D10). Behavioral analysis and ultrasonic vocalization (USV) recordings were made on D0 and D10. Next, the rats were further subgrouped according to estrus phases identified through a vaginal smear (8 proestrus rats and 8 non-proestrus rats, in each group). The rat's anxiety levels were analyzed with an elevated plus maze (EPM), and their c-fos expression was measured at the cingulate cortex, the amygdala, and the paraventricular thalamic nucleus. Our results showed that the citalopram group showed significantly more grooming behaviors on D10 than the control group (p=0.002). USVs on D0, D10 and during the EPM did not show any significant differences between the groups. Proestrus rats in the control group showed significantly less anxiety-like behavior during the EPM than the non-proestrus rats in the control group (p=0.028 for time spent in open arms, and p=0.011 for entries into open arms). There was no significant difference in anxiety-like behavior between the control and citalopram groups, and between the proestrus and non-estrous rats in the citalopram group. C-fos expression at the amygdala (p=0.013) and the paraventricular thalamic nucleus (p=0.014) was significantly inhibited in the citalopram group. We concluded that estrus cycles have a significant effect on anxiety levels in rats, which may be suppressed behaviorally and neurobiologically by citalopram., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine the utility of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS) for the neurodevelopmental follow up of high-risk preterms., Methods: The study group consisted of 122 preterm infants of the gestational ages between 26 and 37 weeks. Medical factors such as; mean birth weight, gestational age, gender, birth place and type, number of multiple pregnancy, days of hospitalization and oxygen therapy, use of antenatal steroids, and occurrence of sepsis for each patient were evaluated. The neurodevelopmental examination and BINS administration was made at each visit to the patients whose ages were adjusted for prematurity., Results: At the corrected age of 7-10 months patients at 26-29 GA had significantly lower total means of BINS scores when compared to those of the other two groups at 30-32 and 33-37 GA (P<0.01 and P<0.001). At the corrected age of 3-4 months, the total means of the BINS scores of the patients at 30-32 GA were lower than that of the patients at 33-37 GA (P<0.009). at 7-10 months the scores of the items defining the expressive and cognitive functions of the patients at 26-29 GA were lower than those of the patients at 30-32 GA (P<0.05) and 33-37 GA (P<0.05). At 16-20 months the mean scores of the items of expressive functions were significantly lower in patients of the 26-29 GA compared to those of the patients of 33-37 GA (P<0.03)., Conclusion: As data accumulates, BINS will turn out to be a quick way of determining infants at risk of developmental delay in many aspects of neurologically high risk conditions.