Search

With an increasing number of large-scale population-based cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging studies being conducted nowadays, there comes the mammoth task of image annotation and image analysis. Such population-based studies would greatly benefit from automated pipelines, with an efficient CMR image analysis workflow. The purpose of this work is to investigate the feasibility of using a fully-automatic pipeline to segment the left ventricular endocardium and epicardium simultaneously on two orthogonal (vertical and horizontal) long-axis cardiac cine MRI scans. The pipeline is based on a multi-atlas-based segmentation approach and a spatio-temporal registration approach. The performance of the method was assessed by: (i) comparing the automatic segmentations to those obtained manually at both the end-diastolic and end-systolic phase, (ii) comparing the automatically obtained clinical parameters, including end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume and ejection fraction, with those defined manually and (iii) by the accuracy of classifying subjects to the appropriate risk category based on the estimated ejection fraction. Automatic segmentation of the left ventricular endocardium was achieved with a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.93 on the end-diastolic phase for both the vertical and horizontal long-axis scan; on the end-systolic phase the DSC was 0.88 and 0.85, respectively. For the epicardium, a DSC of 0.94 and 0.95 was obtained on the end-diastolic vertical and horizontal long-axis scans; on the end-systolic phase the DSC was 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. With respect to the clinical volumetric parameters, Pearson correlation coefficient (R) of 0.97 was obtained for the end-diastolic volume, 0.95 for end-systolic volume, 0.87 for stroke volume and 0.84 for ejection fraction. Risk category classification based on ejection fraction showed that 80% of the subjects were assigned to the correct risk category and only one subject (< 1%) was more than one risk category off. We conclude that the proposed automatic pipeline presents a viable and cost-effective alternative for manual annotation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In this work, we present a fully automated algorithm for extraction of the 3D arterial tree and labelling the tree segments from whole-body magnetic resonance angiography (WB-MRA) sequences. The algorithm developed consists of two core parts (i) 3D volume reconstruction from different stations with simultaneous correction of different types of intensity inhomogeneity, and (ii) Extraction of the arterial tree and subsequent labelling of the pruned extracted tree. Extraction of the arterial tree is performed using the probability map of the "contrast" class, which is obtained as one of the results of the inhomogeneity correction scheme. We demonstrate that such approach is more robust than using the difference between the pre- and post-contrast channels traditionally used for this purpose. Labelling the extracted tree is performed by using a combination of graph-based and atlas-based approaches. Validation of our method with respect to the extracted tree was performed on the arterial tree subdivided into 32 segments, 82.4% of which were completely detected, 11.7% partially detected, and 5.9% were missed on a cohort of 35 subjects. With respect to automated labelling accuracy of the 32 segments, various registration strategies were investigated on a training set consisting of 10 scans. Further analysis on the test set consisting of 25 data sets indicates that 69% of the vessel centerline tree in the head and neck region, 80% in the thorax and abdomen region, and 84% in the legs was accurately labelled to the correct vessel segment. These results indicate clinical potential of our approach in enabling fully automated and accurate analysis of the entire arterial tree. This is the first study that not only automatically extracts the WB-MRA arterial tree, but also labels the vessel tree segments., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Chromatin regulators are widely expressed proteins with diverse roles in gene expression, nuclear organization, cell cycle regulation, pluripotency, physiology and development, and are frequently mutated in human diseases such as cancer. Their inhibition often results in pleiotropic effects that are difficult to study using conventional approaches. We have developed a semi-automated nuclear tracking algorithm to quantify the divisions, movements and positions of all nuclei during the early development of Caenorhabditis elegans and have used it to systematically study the effects of inhibiting chromatin regulators. The resulting high dimensional datasets revealed that inhibition of multiple regulators, including F55A3.3 (encoding FACT subunit SUPT16H), lin-53 (RBBP4/7), rba-1 (RBBP4/7), set-16 (MLL2/3), hda-1 (HDAC1/2), swsn-7 (ARID2), and let-526 (ARID1A/1B) affected cell cycle progression and caused chromosome segregation defects. In contrast, inhibition of cir-1 (CIR1) accelerated cell division timing in specific cells of the AB lineage. The inhibition of RNA polymerase II also accelerated these division timings, suggesting that normal gene expression is required to delay cell cycle progression in multiple lineages in the early embryo. Quantitative analyses of the dataset suggested the existence of at least two functionally distinct SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex activities in the early embryo, and identified a redundant requirement for the egl-27 and lin-40 MTA orthologs in the development of endoderm and mesoderm lineages. Moreover, our dataset also revealed a characteristic rearrangement of chromatin to the nuclear periphery upon the inhibition of multiple general regulators of gene expression. Our systematic, comprehensive and quantitative datasets illustrate the power of single cell-resolution quantitative tracking and high dimensional phenotyping to investigate gene function. Furthermore, the results provide an overview of the functions of essential chromatin regulators during the early development of an animal., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)