1. Measurement and modelling of the vapor-liquid equilibrium of (CO2 + CO) at temperatures between (218.15 and 302.93) K at pressures up to 15 MPa
- Author
-
Saif Z.S. Al Ghafri, J. P. Martin Trusler, and Lorena F.S. Souza
- Subjects
Vapor pressure ,0306 Physical Chemistry (Incl. Structural) ,Thermodynamics ,CO2 TRANSPORT ,02 engineering and technology ,CARBON-DIOXIDE SYSTEM ,010501 environmental sciences ,Flory–Huggins solution theory ,GASES ,Mole fraction ,0915 Interdisciplinary Engineering ,01 natural sciences ,REGION ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,020401 chemical engineering ,PHASE-EQUILIBRIA ,Critical point (thermodynamics) ,TEMPERATURES ,Carbon capture, transport and storage ,General Materials Science ,0204 chemical engineering ,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry ,Carbon monoxide ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Science & Technology ,Chemistry ,Chemistry, Physical ,Vapor-liquid equilibrium ,PRESSURES ,MIXTURES ,Chemical Engineering ,Thermodynamic model ,EQUATION-OF-STATE ,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics ,Carbon dioxide ,Physical Sciences ,Vapor–liquid equilibrium ,Phase behavior ,BEHAVIOR - Abstract
Precise knowledge of vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE) data of (CO2 + diluent) mixtures is crucial in the design and operation of carbon capture, transportation and storage processes. VLE measurements of the (CO2 + CO) system are reported along seven isotherms at temperatures ranging from just above the triple-point temperature of CO2 to 302.93 K and at pressures from the vapor pressure of pure CO2 to approximately 15 MPa, including near-critical mixture states for all isotherms. The measurements are associated with estimated standard uncertainties of 0.006 K for temperature, 0.009 MPa for pressure and 0.011x(1 − x) for mole fraction x. The new VLE data have been compared with two thermodynamic models: the Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR-EOS) and a multi-fluid Helmholtz-energy equation of state known as EOS-CG. The PR-EOS was used with a single temperature-dependent binary interaction parameter, which was fitted to the experimental data. In contrast, EOS-CG was used in a purely-predictive mode with no parameters fitted to the present results. While PR-EOS generally agrees fairly well with the experimental data, EOS-CG showed significantly better agreement, especially close to the critical point.
- Published
- 2018