Search

Essentials Imaging is warranted in the majority of patients to confirm or rule out pulmonary embolism (PE). The age-adjusted D-dimer (ADJUST) reduced the number of required imaging tests in patients ≥ 50 years. The YEARS algorithm was designed to improve the efficiency in patients with suspected PE. There was no added value of implementing ADJUST in the YEARS algorithm in our cohort., Summary: Background The YEARS algorithm was designed to simplify the diagnostic work-up of pulmonary embolism (PE) and to reduce the number of necessary computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) scans. An alternative strategy to reduce the number of CTPAs is the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (ADJUST) in patients aged 50 years or older. We aimed to investigate whether a combination of both diagnostic strategies might save additional CTPAs. Methods The YEARS algorithm consists of three items (clinical signs of deep venous thrombosis, hemoptysis, 'PE most likely diagnosis') with simultaneous D-dimer testing using a pre-test dependent threshold. We performed a post hoc analysis in 3465 patients managed according to YEARS to compare the number of patients managed without CTPA scans and associated diagnostic failures in hypothetical scenarios with different YEARS-ADJUST combinations. Results Following the YEARS algorithm, 1651 patients (48%) were managed without CTPA; PE was diagnosed in 456 (13%) patients at baseline and 18 patients with initial normal testing suffered venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 3-month follow-up (failure rate 0.61%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.96). If ADJUST had been fully integrated in YEARS, 1627 patients (47%) would have been managed without CTPA (absolute decrease of 0.69%; 95% CI -1.7 to 3.0), at cost of four additional missed PE diagnoses at baseline, for a projected 3-month VTE failure rate of 0.75% (95% CI, 0.49-1.13). None of the other studied scenarios showed relevant improvements in efficiency as well, but all led to more missed diagnoses. Conclusion In our cohort, there was no added value of implementing ADJUST in the YEARS algorithm., (© 2017 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: There has been debate over how patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) can be safely selected for outpatient treatment., Objectives: To compare the Hestia criteria with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria for selecting low-risk patients with PE for outpatient treatment., Methods: From 2008 to 2010, 496 patients with acute, symptomatic PE were screened and 275 treated at home and 221 treated in the hospital according to the Hestia Study protocol. The Hestia criteria were used to select patients for outpatient treatment. Right and left ventricular (RV and LV) diameters were measured on computed tomography images. RV dysfunction was defined as an RV/LV ratio > 1.0. Patients were classified according to the ESC criteria into low, intermediate and high-risk groups, based on blood pressure and RV dysfunction. During 3 months follow-up adverse events were scored., Results: Adverse events occurred in 22 patients (4.5%) treated in the hospital vs. none of the patients treated at home (P < 0.001). Sensitivity and negative predictive value for adverse outcome were 100% for the Hestia criteria and 96% and 99% for the ESC criteria, respectively. Of the patients treated at home according to the Hestia criteria, 35% were normotensive but had RV dysfunction and were classified as intermediate risk according to the ESC criteria. No adverse events happened in these patients treated at home., Conclusions: Clinical criteria, such as the Hestia criteria, could be helpful in selecting patients, including those with RV dysfunction who have a low risk of adverse clinical outcome and could be candidates for outpatient treatment., (© 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Traditionally, patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are initially treated in the hospital with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The results of a few small non-randomized studies suggest that, in selected patients with proven PE, outpatient treatment is potentially feasible and safe., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient treatment according to predefined criteria in patients with acute PE., Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients with objectively proven acute PE was conducted in 12 hospitals in The Netherlands between 2008 and 2010. Patients with acute PE were triaged with the predefined criteria for eligibility for outpatient treatment, with LMWH (nadroparin) followed by vitamin K antagonists. All patients eligible for outpatient treatment were sent home either immediately or within 24 h after PE was objectively diagnosed. Outpatient treatment was evaluated with respect to recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), including PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), major hemorrhage and total mortality during 3 months of follow-up., Results: Of 297 included patients, who all completed the follow-up, six (2.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-4.3) had recurrent VTE (five PE [1.7%] and one DVT [0.3%]). Three patients (1.0%, 95% CI 0.2-2.9) died during the 3 months of follow-up, none of fatal PE. Two patients had a major bleeding event, one of which was fatal intracranial bleeding (0.7%, 95% CI 0.08-2.4)., Conclusion: Patients with PE selected for outpatient treatment with predefined criteria can be treated with anticoagulants on an outpatient basis. (Dutch Trial Register No 1319; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp)., (© 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

HLA-identical bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is associated with both graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reactivity. Different T-cell subsets from the bone marrow (BM) graft may be responsible for GVHD and GVL reactivity after BMT. In the etiology of GVHD, not only CD8+ but also CD4+ donor T lymphocytes may play an important role. Here we report a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who was transplanted with the BM from his HLA-genotypically identical sister. After BMT there was complete engraftment, but the patient died because of acute GVHD grade III-IV in complete remission. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) lines were generated after BMT using the irradiated leukemic cells from the patient as stimulator cells and the donor-originated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, procured from the patient after BMT, as responder cells. The generated CTL lines showed specific lysis of the recipient lymphocytes and leukemic cells in a 51Cr release assay. Two types of CTL clones could be established from these CTL lines, both phenotypically CD4+. Clone type I showed male-specific HLA-DQ5-restricted lysis of the recipient lymphocytes, but not of the circulating relatively mature leukemic cells from the patient. This may be explained by the low HLA-DQ5 expression of the more mature CML cells. Clone type II showed HLA-DR2-restricted minor histocompatibility antigen-specific lysis of the recipient lymphocytes and leukemic cells. Both types of CTL clones showed antigen-specific cell-mediated growth inhibition of the recipient clonogenic leukemic precursor cells. These CD4+ CTL clones produced several activating cytokines including tumor necrosis factor alpha, interferon gamma, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and macrophage CSF. Our results illustrate that these CD4+ CTL clones may have induced GVHD directly by cytolysis and indirectly by activating cytokines. Because both types of CTL clones recognized the recipient leukemic progenitor cells, they may also contribute to GVL reactivity after BMT.