Search

Purpose: It is unclear how often adolescents with persistent asthma know when to use different inhaled medications (as-needed rescue vs. daily controller; 'accurate use'), or whether this knowledge is associated with clinical asthma outcomes. This study aimed to characterize adolescent knowledge of accurate use; examine whether accurate use is associated with controller medication adherence, asthma symptoms, or exacerbations requiring acute health care services; and determine whether knowledge of accurate use improves following regular exposure to controller medications with school-based directly observed therapy (DOT)., Methods: We analyzed baseline and 7-month data from the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens trial. Adolescents (12-16 years) identified inhaled medications on a chart and stated when each is used. We compared accurate use with adolescent-reported adherence, recent symptoms, and asthma-related acute health care visits; and exposure to DOT. Analyses were limited to subjects with controller medication., Results: Of 430 participants, 252 had controller medication at baseline. Knowledge of accurate use was described by 62%, and associated with adherence (odds ratio [OR]: 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-3.83). By 7 months, 313 adolescents had controller medication; 75% described accurate use, which was associated with adherence (OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.83-6.54), health care (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.79), and DOT exposure (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.10-3.32). Associations with adherence and health care at 7 months persisted in adjusted analyses., Discussion: Adolescent knowledge of accurate medication use was linked with greater adherence (baseline, 7 months), less acute health care (7 months), and exposure to in-school DOT. Interventions to support adolescents with persistent asthma should consider school-based care strategies and facilitate adolescent understanding of when to use different medications., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Clinical diagnoses of asthma and reactive airway disease (RAD) in young children are subjective. We examined how often children were diagnosed with asthma versus RAD, and whether preventive care and 2-year clinical outcomes differed based on initial diagnosis., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of children (2-7 years) from a university-based general pediatrics practice who had been diagnosed with RAD or asthma. We performed adjusted comparisons between groups for time until subsequent asthma-related care. We also compared delivery of asthma-related healthcare services, corticosteroid and controller prescriptions, and action plans within 2 years of index diagnosis, using bivariate and regression analyses., Results: Four hundred three children were included (64% male, 67% Black, 25% Hispanic). RAD was diagnosed in 62% of index visits, and was more likely than asthma to be diagnosed in emergency settings. In the full sample, the time between index visit and subsequent asthma care did not differ between groups, after adjustment for index location. For subjects with complete 24-month follow-up (N = 300), no between-group differences were found in adjusted analyses. Most children with RAD received action plans and controller medications only after a subsequent asthma diagnosis, on average, 9 months after their index visit., Conclusions: RAD diagnoses were linked to delayed delivery of preventive care measures, but within 2 years of initial diagnosis, clinical outcomes for those diagnosed with RAD and asthma did not differ. To facilitate clear communication and timely treatment, a prompt diagnosis of asthma, rather than RAD, should be considered for children with asthma symptoms., (Copyright © 2021 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: It is unclear whether research participation effects contribute to an improvement in asthma symptoms during clinical trials in the absence of any active intervention. We examined the impact of additional follow-up surveys on caregiver-reported symptoms among control subjects in a series of randomized controlled asthma trials., Methods: We analyzed baseline and follow-up data for children (3-10 years) with poorly controlled persistent asthma that participated as control subjects in 1 of 3 randomized trials of urban school-based asthma care (study duration: 7-10 months). We compared mean symptom-free days (SFD) per 2 weeks between baseline and final follow-up; performed bivariate regressions to explore associations between demographics and changes in SFD; and performed multivariate random-effects generalized least square regression to examine the relationship between number of follow-ups beyond baseline (range: 1-10) and changes in SFD over time., Results: Five hundred and sixteen children were enrolled as controls across the 3 trials (mean age 7.5 years, 61% Black, 28% Hispanic, 81% Medicaid). Mean SFDs increased significantly from baseline to final follow-up (7.8-11.4 days, P < .001). In adjusted analyses, significant improvements in SFD were observed with all follow-up contacts in comparison with baseline. Symptom improvement showed a dose-response relationship with the number of follow-up assessments completed (1, 2-3, 4-5, and 6-10 assessments)., Conclusions: Children with uncontrolled asthma who participate as controls in clinical trials experience a significant increase in SFD with additional follow-up assessments. This improvement should be considered when designing/analyzing asthma interventions, and may help guide clinical outreach efforts for underserved children with persistent asthma., (Copyright © 2019 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Teen readiness assessments may provide a developmental indicator of the transfer of responsibility for health self-management from caregivers to teens. Among urban adolescents with asthma, we aimed to describe teen readiness for talking with providers and identify how readiness relates to responsibility for asthma management, medication beliefs, and clinical outcomes., Methods: Teens and caregivers enrolled in the school-based asthma care for teen's trial in Rochester, NY completed in-home surveys. We classified ready teens as those reporting a score of five on both items of the transition readiness assessment questionnaire talking with providers subscale. We performed bivariate analyses to detect differences between ready teens and other teens in teen- and caregiver-reported responsibility, teen medication beliefs, and clinical outcomes (medication adherence over the past 2 weeks, and healthcare use over the past year)., Results: Among this sample of 251 adolescents (mean age: 13.4 years), 35% were classified as "Ready." Ready teens were more likely than other teens to want to use a controller medication independently (7.6 vs. 6.5 out of 10, p < .01) and to have confidence in this ability (8.4 vs. 7.6 out of 10, p = .02). Teens reported poor adherence (missed 52.9% of prescribed controller doses), with no differences in responsibility or clinical outcomes based on level of teen readiness for talking with providers., Conclusions: In urban adolescents with poorly controlled asthma, a higher level of teen readiness for talking with providers is associated with higher perceptions of independence in medication taking, but does not appear to relate to clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Clinician prompts increase the likelihood of guideline-recommended corrective actions (preventive medication prescription, dose change, and/or adherence promotion) for symptomatic children with poorly controlled or persistent asthma in the primary care setting, but it is unclear if all children equally benefit. The objectives of this study were to identify whether asthma severity, visit type, and current preventive medication use were predictive of corrective actions during visits for children with symptomatic asthma, and determine whether these factors modified the effect of a prompting intervention., Methods: We conducted prespecified subgroup analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial of physician prompting that promoted guideline-based asthma management for urban children with symptomatic asthma. We tested predictors of corrective actions with bivariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regressions, compared intervention effects across factor categories via stratified analyses, and characterized effect modification with interaction term analyses., Results: Prompting intervention exposure, moderate/severe disease, asthma-focused visits, and current preventive medication use were predictive of corrective actions. The prompting intervention significantly increased the rate of corrective actions for children across categories of disease severity, visit type, and preventive medication use. However, the intervention effect was significantly smaller for children already using a preventive medication (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.38) compared with children without preventive medication use (adjusted OR, 6.25; 95% CI, 3.39-11.54)., Conclusions: Prompting increases the likelihood of corrective actions during clinic encounters; however, children already using preventive medication benefit less. It is critical for providers to recognize the need for corrective actions among these symptomatic children., (Copyright © 2017 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the abilities of teens with uncontrolled persistent asthma and their caregivers to identify inhaled medications and state correct indications for use; examine medication responsibility within dyads; and determine whether responsibility is associated with knowledge about inhaled therapies., Methods: In the baseline survey for the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) trial, we separately asked caregivers and teens to: 1) identify the teen's inhaled asthma therapies by name and from a picture chart (complete matches considered "concordant"); 2) describe indications of use for each medication; and 3) describe the allocation of responsibility for medication use within dyads. We limited analyses to dyads in which either member reported at least one rescue and one inhaled controller medication; we used McNemar and Pearson chi-square tests., Results: A total of 136 dyads were analyzed. More caregivers than teens concordantly identified medications (63% vs 31%, P < .001). There was no difference between caregivers and teens in the ability to state correct indications for use (56% vs 54%, P = .79). More teens than caregivers endorsed "full teen responsibility" for rescue medication (65% vs 27%, P < .001) and controller medication use (50% vs 15%, P < .001). Neither concordant identification nor knowing indications for use was associated with reported medication responsibility., Conclusions: Medication responsibility within dyads of caregivers and teens with persistent asthma is not associated with knowledge about inhaled therapies. Targeting both members of the dyad with education and self-management strategies before responsibility transitions start may allow providers to avoid a missed opportunity to support these emerging stakeholders to adherence., (Copyright © 2018 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine caregiver ability to name their child's inhaled asthma medications, and examine whether perceived ease of remembering names is associated with accurate naming and asthma outcomes., Methods: As part of the School-Based Telemedicine-Enhanced Asthma Management trial in Rochester, New York, we asked caregivers of children with persistent asthma to: 1) name their child's inhaled medications, and 2) indicate agreement with the statement, "it is easy to remember the names of my child's asthma medications." We limited analyses to subjects with 1 inhaled medication. Reported names were compared with canisters available during a home visit; complete matches were considered concordant. We compared ease of remembering names with concordance, asthma symptoms, and adherence using bivariate and multivariate analyses., Results: Overall, 141 caregivers (87%) had children with 1 inhaled medication (62% black race, 68% Medicaid). Most (74%) perceived it easy to remember medication names, yet only 46% reported names concordant with medications at home. Caregivers who did not easily remember medication names were less likely to concordantly name available medications (23% vs 54%; P = .002), and more likely to report that their child experienced >2 symptom days per week (33% vs 16%; P = .03), >2 symptom nights per month (31% vs 12%; P = .02), and missed >1 dose(s) of preventive medication in the previous 2 weeks (52% vs 28%; P = .03). Findings were consistent in multivariate regression analyses., Conclusions: Caregivers of urban children with persistent asthma who considered medication names difficult to remember were less able to accurately name available medications, and reported worse control and medication adherence. Greater attention to medication identification might improve outcomes in this population., Competing Interests: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2016 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)