Search

Background: Individuals with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion are at increased risk of poor outcomes. Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase might improve outcomes in this population. We aimed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase over non-thrombolytic standard of care in patients with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality., Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, parallel group, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomised controlled trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were included at 48 hospitals in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, Spain, and the UK. Eligible patients with minor acute ischaemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5) and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality were enrolled within 12 h from stroke onset. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) or non-thrombolytic standard of care (control). Primary outcome was a return to baseline functioning on pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale score in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients randomly assigned to a treatment group and who did not withdraw consent to participate) assessed at 90 days. Safety outcomes were reported in the ITT population and included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02398656, and is closed to accrual., Findings: The trial was stopped early for futility. Between April 27, 2015, and Jan 19, 2024, 886 patients were enrolled; 369 (42%) were female and 517 (58%) were male. 454 (51%) were assigned to control and 432 (49%) to intravenous tenecteplase. The primary outcome occurred in 338 (75%) of 452 patients in the control group and 309 (72%) of 432 in the tenecteplase group (risk ratio [RR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·88-1·04, p=0·29). More patients died in the tenecteplase group (20 deaths [5%]) than in the control group (five deaths [1%]; adjusted hazard ratio 3·8; 95% CI 1·4-10·2, p=0·0085). There were eight (2%) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages in the tenecteplase group versus two (<1%) in the control group (RR 4·2; 95% CI 0·9-19·7, p=0·059)., Interpretation: There was no benefit and possible harm from treatment with intravenous tenecteplase. Patients with minor stroke and intracranial occlusion should not be routinely treated with intravenous thrombolysis., Funding: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the British Heart Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SBC received grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), and the British Heart Foundation (BHF) to complete the TEMPO-2 study. Boehringer Ingelheim provided off-the-shelf study drug (tenecteplase) for the study. JFA has received public research grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science, the regional health department, the European Commission, and a private research grant from AstraZeneca. He has received consultant or speaker fees from Pfizer-BMS, Medtronic, and Amgen, and travel support from Daiichi-Sankyo. KSB reports speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. LC has received consulting or speakers fees from Roche. JF reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Sankyo, and Daiichi. AG reports a grant from Microvention; speaker fees from Alexion, Biogen, and Servier Canada; and stock options for SnapDx and Collavidence. DG reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ipsen, and Eisai. MG reports grant funding from Medtronic and Cerenovus and consulting fees from Mentice, CSL Behring, MicroVention, and Medtronic. TSF participated in an advisory board for Roche. FL reports speaker fees and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. BKM has been paid honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. MM has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim for participation at an advisory board on the approval of tenecteplase for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. SOM has received speaker fees from Boehringer, Medtronic, Penumbra, Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Servier, and Daiichi Sankyo. KWM reports grant funding from the BHF, and the Stroke Association; consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen, IschaemaView; lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, IschaemaView, and Brainomix; and non-financial support (drug supply for ATTEST-2 trial) from Boehringer Ingelheim. MWP is on Boehringer Ingelheim Advisory Board for Metalyse in stroke. AP received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and travel support from AstraZeneca for attending a meeting. OMP-N has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. RS is part funded by the UCLH Biomedical Research Centre. DS reports an unrestricted educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim. MIW reports sponsorship or financial assistance to support attendance at scientific meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo UK, and Bayer; honoraria for lectures given at education meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; and payment for participation in advisory panels from Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo UK. DJW is the Co-principal Investigator for Health Research Board of Ireland, Award–Improving Pathways for Acute Stroke and Rehabilitation. AYXY reports salary support from the HSFC. MDH reports grant funding from CIHR, HSFC, Alberta Innovates, and study drug from Boehringer Ingelheim; grants from NoNo and Medtronic; consulting fees from Sun Pharma Brainsgate; and a DSMB member role on many stroke clinical trials., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Dyslipidaemia characterised by elevated total cholesterol/LDL-C, triglyceride or both or decreased HDL-C is an important risk factor for the development of ASCVD. Atherogenic dyslipidaemia characterised by high TG, low HDL-C and elevated small dense LDL (sdLDL) is more prevalent in Asian Indians. Normal level of TG is generally considered as <150 mg/dl. Hypertriglyceridemia is closely associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus. Goals of management of hypertriglyceridemia are to lower the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events and reduce the risk of pancreatitis. Lifestyle modification is important. In severe hypertriglyceridemia, TG lowering pharmacotherapy is important to prevent pancreatitis. In mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia, pharmacotherapy is employed only if associated with ASCVD or high risk factors and not controlled with lifestyle modifications and statins. Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol which estimates the cholesterol content of the atherogenic apoB containing lipoproteins, measured as total cholesterol minus HDL-C is equivalent to LDL-C in ASCVD risk assessment and superior to it in those with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia. Some international guidelines, have included measurement of non-HDL-C as primary therapeutic target for patients with ASCVD. Low HDL cholesterol is common in Indians. Despite evidence of inverse relationship between HDL-C and cardiovascular events, HDL-C as a causative factor for development of atherosclerosis is unproven. Therapeutic strategies directed at increasing HDL-C levels have not been shown to have cardiovascular benefits and hence HDL-C is currently not a target for drug-based treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Dyslipidemias are the most important coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor. Proper management of dyslipidemia is crucial to control the epidemic of premature CAD in India. Cardiological Society of India strived to develop consensus-based guidelines for better lipid management for CAD prevention and treatment. The executive summary provides a bird's eye-view of the 'CSI: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management' published in this issue of the Indian Heart Journal. The summary is focused on the busy clinician and encourages evidence-based management of patients and high-risk individuals. The summary has serialized various aspects of lipid management including epidemiology and categorization of CAD risk. The focus is on management of specific dyslipidemias relevant to India-raised low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoproteins, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a). Drug therapies for lipid lowering (statins, non-statin drugs and other pharmaceutical agents) and lifestyle management (dietary interventions, physical activity and yoga) are summarized. Management of dyslipidemias in oft-neglected patient phenotypes-the elderly, young and children, and patients with comorbidities-stroke, peripheral arterial disease, kidney failure, posttransplant, HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus), Covid-19 and familial hypercholesterolemia is also presented. This consensus statement is based on major international guidelines (mainly European) and expert opinion of lipid management leaders from India with focus on the dictum: earlier the better, lower the better, longer the better and together the better. These consensus guidelines cannot replace the individual clinician judgement who remains the sole arbiter in management of the patient., (Copyright © 2023 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The presentation and outcomes of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) during COVID times (June 2020 to Dec 2020) were compared with the historical control during the same period in 2019., Methods: Data of 4806 consecutive patients of acute HF admitted in 22 centres in the country were collected during this period. The admission patterns, aetiology, outcomes, prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and interventions were analysed in this retrospective study., Results: Admissions for acute heart failure during the pandemic period in 2020 decreased by 20% compared to the corresponding six-month period in 2019, with numbers dropping from 2675 to 2131. However, no difference in the epidemiology was seen. The mean age of presentation in 2019 was 61.75 (±13.7) years, and 59.97 (±14.6) years in 2020. There was a significant decrease in the mean age of presentation (p = 0.001). Also. the proportion of male patients decreased significantly from 68.67% to 65.84% (p = 0.037). The in-hospital mortality for acute heart failure did not differ significantly between 2019 and 2020 (4.19% and 4.,97%) respectively (p = 0.19). The proportion of patients with HFrEF did not change in 2020 compared to 2019 (76.82% vs 75.74%, respectively). The average duration of hospital stay was 6.5 days., Conclusion: The outcomes of ADHF patients admitted during the Covid pandemic did not differ significantly. The length of hospital stay remained the same. The study highlighted the sub-optimal use of GDMT, though slightly improving over the last few years., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ALL PARTICIPATING CENTRE CO INVESTIGATORS reports financial support was provided by Cardiological Society of India., (Copyright © 2023 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Risk prediction following ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in resource limited countries is critical to identify patients at an increased risk of mortality who might benefit from intensive management., Methods: North India ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NORIN-STEMI) is an ongoing registry that has prospectively enrolled 3,635 STEMI patients. Of these, 3191 patients with first STEMI were included. Patients were divided into two groups: development (n=2668) and validation (unseen) dataset (n=523). Various ML strategies were used to train and tune the model based on validation dataset results that included 31 clinical characteristics. These models were compared in sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and overall accuracy to predict mortality at 30 days. ML model decision making was analyzed using the Shapley Additive exPlanations (ShAP) summary plot., Results: At 30 days, the mortality was 7.7%. On the validation dataset, Extra Tree ML model had the best predictive ability with sensitivity: 85%, AUC: 79.7%, and Accuracy: 75%. ShAP interpretable summary plot determined delay in time to revascularization, baseline cardiogenic shock, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, age, serum creatinine, heart failure on presentation, female sex, and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation to be major predictors of all-cause mortality at 30 days (P<0.001 for all)., Conclusion: ML models lead to an improved mortality prediction following STEMI. ShAP summary plot for the interpretability of the AI model helps to understand the model's decision in identifying high-risk individuals who may benefit from intensified follow-up and close monitoring., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Studies on the changes in the presentation and management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during the COVID-19 pandemic from low- and middle-income countries are limited. We sought to determine the changes in the number of admissions, management practices, and outcomes of AMI during the pandemic period in India., Methods & Results: In this two-timepoint cross-sectional study involving 187 hospitals across India, patients admitted with AMI between 15th March to 15th June in 2020 were compared with those admitted during the corresponding period of 2019. We included 41,832 consecutive adults with AMI. Admissions during the pandemic period (n = 16414) decreased by 35·4% as compared to the corresponding period in 2019 (n = 25418). We observed significant heterogeneity in this decline across India. The weekly average decrease in AMI admissions in 2020 correlated negatively with the number of COVID cases (r = -0·48; r 2  = 0·2), but strongly correlated with the stringency of lockdown index (r = 0·95; r 2  = 0·90). On a multi-level logistic regression, admissions were lower in 2020 with older age categories, tier 1 cities, and centers with high patient volume. Adjusted utilization rate of coronary angiography, and percutaneous coronary intervention decreased by 11·3%, and 5·9% respectively., Conclusions: The magnitude of reduction in AMI admissions across India was not uniform. The nature, time course, and the patient demographics were different compared to reports from other countries, suggesting a significant impact due to the lockdown. These findings have important implications in managing AMI during the pandemic., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Nothing to declare for all the authors., (Copyright © 2021 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We report patient characteristics, treatment pattern and one-year clinical outcome of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from Kerala, India. This cohort forms part of Kerala Atrial Fibrillation (KERALA-AF) registry which is an ongoing large prospective study., Methods: KERALA-AF registry collected data of adults with previously or newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) during April 2016 to April 2017. A total of 3421 patients were recruited from 53 hospitals across Kerala state. We analysed one-year follow-up outcome of 2507 patients with NVAF., Results: Mean age at recruitment was 67.2 years (range 18-98) and 54.8% were males. Main co-morbidities were hypertension (61.2%), hyperlipidaemia (46.2%) and diabetes mellitus (37.2%). Major co-existing diseases were chronic kidney disease (42.1%), coronary artery disease (41.6%), and chronic heart failure (26.4%). Mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 3.18 (SD ± 1.7) and HAS-BLED score, 1.84 (SD ± 1.3). At baseline, use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) was 38.6% and antiplatelets 32.7%. On one-month follow-up use of OAC increased to 65.8% and antiplatelets to 48.3%. One-year all-cause mortality was 16.48 and hospitalization 20.65 per 100 person years. The main causes of death were cardiovascular (75.0%), stroke (13.1%) and others (11.9%). The major causes of hospitalizations were acute coronary syndrome (35.0%), followed by arrhythmia (29.5%) and heart failure (8.4%)., Conclusions: Despite high risk profile of patients in this registry, use of OAC was suboptimal, whereas antiplatelets were used in nearly half of patients. A relatively high rate of annual mortality and hospitalization was observed in patients with NVAF in Kerala AF Registry., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has affected around 20million patients worldwide and 2.0 million cases from India. The lockdown was employed to delay the pandemic. However, it had an unintentional impact on acute cardiovascular care, especially acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Observational studies have shown a decrease in hospital admissions for AMI in several developed countries during the pandemic period. We aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the AMI admissions patterns across India., Methods: In this multicentric, retrospective, cross-sectional study, we included all AMI cases admitted to participating hospitals during the study period 15th March to 15th June 2020 and compared them using a historical control of all cases of AMI admitted during the corresponding period in the year 2019. Major objective of the study is to analyze the changes inthe number of hospital admissions for AMI in hospitals across India. In addition, we intend to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the weekly AMI admission rates, and other performance measures like rates of thrombolysis/primary percutaneous interventions (PCI), window period, door to balloon time, and door to needle time. Other objectives include evaluation of changes in the major complications and mortality rates of AMI and its predictors during COVID-19 pandemic., Conclusions: This CSI-AMI study will provide scientific evidence about the impact of COVID-19 on AMI care in India. Based on this study, we may be able to suggest appropriate changes to the existing MI guidelines and to educate the public regarding emergency care for AMI during COVID-19 pandemic., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors are solely responsible for the design of the study, the conduct of the study, drafting and editing of the paper, and its final contents., (Copyright © 2020 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Hypertension is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. There is limited data on hypertension prevalence in India. This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hypertension among Indian adults., Methods: A national level survey was conducted with fixed one-day blood pressure measurement camps across 24 states and union territories of India. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mmHg or a diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or on treatment for hypertension. The prevalence was age- and gender-standardized according to the 2011 census population of India., Results: Blood pressure was recorded for 180,335 participants (33.2% women; mean age 40.6 ± 14.9 years). Among them, 8,898 (4.9%), 99,791 (55.3%), 35,694 (11.9%), 23,084 (12.8%), 9,989 (5.5%), and 2,878 (1.6%) participants were of the age group 18-19, 20-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. Overall prevalence of hypertension was 30.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.5, 30.9) and the prevalence among women was 23.7% (95% CI: 23.3, 24). Prevalence adjusted for 2011 census population and the WHO reference population was 29.7% and 32.8%, respectively., Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of hypertension, with almost one in every three Indian adult affected., (Copyright © 2019 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

India's contribution to cardiovascular research has been dismal with a share of only 1% of total number of papers published in the world during the period 1999-2008. Based on two recent studies published from Kerala, the Kerala ACS Registry and the CSI Kerala CRP Study and four other studies being undertaken in Kerala, we think that a Kerala model for cardiovascular research can be conceptualized. This model which consists of funding by professional organization of cardiologists with wide participation of cardiologists, physicians, health workers, nurses, and in some situations general public, logistics looked after by a central coordinator and study design by panel of experts or institutions of repute in the region and carried out at low cost can be considered for implementation in rest of India. Studies based on such a model may change practice pattern of cardiovascular diseases in India., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: There is paucity of reliable contemporary data on prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and risk factors in Indians. Only a few studies on prevalence of CAD have been conducted in Kerala, a Southern Indian state. The main objective of the Cardiological Society of India Kerala Chapter Coronary Artery Disease and Its Risk Factors Prevalence Study (CSI Kerala CRP Study) was to determine the prevalence of CAD and risk factors of CAD in men and women aged 20-79 years in urban and rural settings of three geographical areas of Kerala., Methods: The design of the study was cross-sectional population survey. We estimated the sample size based on an anticipated prevalence of 7.4% of CAD for rural and 11% for urban Kerala. The derived sample sizes for rural and urban areas were 3000 and 2400, respectively. The urban areas for sampling constituted one ward each from three municipal corporations at different parts of the state. The rural sample was drawn from two panchayats each in the same districts as the urban sample. One adult from each household in the age group of 20-59 years was selected using Kish method. All subjects between 60 and 79 years were included from each household. A detailed questionnaire was administered to assess the risk factors, history of CAD, family history, educational status, socioeconomic status, dietary habits, physical activity and treatment for CAD; anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, electrocardiogram and fasting blood levels of glucose and lipids were recorded., (Copyright © 2013 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)