1. Usefulness of the waist-to-height ratio for predicting cardiometabolic risk in children and its suggested boundary values.
- Author
-
Muñoz-Hernando J, Escribano J, Ferré N, Closa-Monasterolo R, Grote V, Koletzko B, Gruszfeld D, ReDionigi A, Verduci E, Xhonneux A, and Luque V
- Subjects
- Biomarkers analysis, Blood Pressure, Body Mass Index, Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Odds Ratio, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Body Height, Mass Screening methods, Pediatric Obesity diagnosis, Risk Assessment methods, Waist Circumference
- Abstract
Background & Aims: Only limited information is available on the usefulness of the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as an abdominal obesity marker in children. Our aim was to compare the ability of a WHtR >90th percentile, a WHtR ≥0.50, a WHtR ≥0.55 and a BMI z-score ≥2 SD to predict cardiometabolic risk in children followed-up at different ages., Methods: We evaluated data from 660 children at 5, 8 and 11 years of age who participated in the Childhood Obesity Project trial in 5 European countries. We classified children with or without cardiometabolic (CMet) risk (yes vs. no) according to the presence of ≥2 parameters (blood pressure, HOMA-IR, triglyceride levels and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels) ≥90th percentile., Results: The odds ratio for CMet risk in children at all followed-up ages was statistically significant for all measures. The OR for the WHtR≥0.55 cut-off was 29.1 (5.6, 151.7) at 5 years of age, 11.8 (4.1, 33.8) at 8 year of age and 3.6 (1.7, 7.7) at 11 years of age, compared to the WHtR<0.55 cut-off. The WHtR≥0.55 cut-off showed a higher OR at younger ages than the BMI z-score ≥2SD, WHtR ≥90th percentile and WHtR≥0.50 cut-offs and a higher positive predictive value (82% at 5 years of age compared to 55%, 36% and 41%, respectively)., Conclusion: A WHtR≥0.55 is a suitable cut-off for screening children at high cardiometabolic risk in the general young European population., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF