Search

Background/aim: Vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is well established but its incidence is low. To assess the molecular evidence of mother-to-infant transmission or intrafamilial transmission of HCV, the NS5 B region and the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of the E2/NS1 region of the HCV genome from each member of a family were investigated., Methods: A 35-year-old mother with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and her four infected boys were studied. The same HCV 1a genotype was found in all five. Phylogenetic analysis was done by the neighbor-joining, the maximum likelihood, and the maximum parsimony methods., Results: Comparison of the phylogenetic trees in the NS5B and HVR1 regions showed that the sequences in the children were more closely related to the population of variants of their own mother than to any genotype la sequence available in the databases. However, four HVR1 clones from two brothers (E2 and E3) had a strong homology, but were significantly divergent from the variants of the mother., Conclusions: These results suggest that a cluster of HCV strains exists in the family and that E3 could have been superinfected by E2 HCV strains and reciprocally. In conclusion, phylogenetic analysis through variable regions of the genome suggests that at least two modes of transmission are involved in this family: perinatal and horizontal.

Previous reports have demonstrated that Cyclosporine A (CyA) chronically administered induces an increase in adenosine plasma concentration by inhibiting adenosine uptake by red blood cells (RBC). We hypothesized that this effect may modulate, by a down regulation, the mRNA expression of adenosine receptors in rat kidney. Since high blood pressure (HBP) is a classical side effect of CyA treatment, nicardipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is often associated with CyA in treatment. To distinguish between the effects of CyA-induced HBP and the effects of CyA by itself, we have evaluated the effects of CyA and/or nicardipine on the mRNA expression of A1 and A2a adenosine receptors. The study was performed on five groups of rats (n= 8) receiving during 21 days either serum saline (0.5 ml i.p), CyA (12 mg/kg/day, i.p), nicardipine (1.2 mg/kg i.p) or nicardipine + CyA. The last (or fifth) group was injected with vehicle (0.5 ml i.p). Blood samples for adenosine assay were collected in the renal artery at day 21, just before the rat kidneys were removed for quantitation of adenosine A1 and A2a mRNA concentration by RT-PCR. We make two conclusions :i) Nicardipine induces a decrease in mRNA expression of A1 but not of A2a adenosine receptors. However, because nicardipine lowered both blood pressure and A1 mRNA expression, it is not possible to conclude if A1 mRNA decrease is implicated in the nicardipine effects on blood pressure.ii) CyA induces an increase in renal artery adenosine concentration and a decrease in mRNA expression of A1 and A2a adenosine receptors.

The evaluation of mild to moderate hypertension must be carried out under the conditions in which treatments are usually prescribed, i.e., in general practice. After specific training of the physicians in the methods used, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of verapamil by comparing it with a reference drug: captopril. The main assessment criterion was the restoration of normal blood pressure in mildly to moderately hypertensive patients (blood pressure in excess of 160/95 mmHg). Blood pressure was evaluated by two methods: a mercury column sphygmomanometer, after the patient had rested in a half-sitting position for 10 minutes, and the ambulatory measurement of blood pressure (AMBP) using the SpaceLabs system. The results of this study involving 40 patients followed up for 3 months by 8 GPs in collaboration with our blood pressure unit were as follows: on verapamil, 47% of patients recovered normal values after 30 days of treatment and 71% after 60 days (with no change in dosage). On captopril, the normalization rates were 22 and 27% respectively. The highly significant reduction of blood pressure found by the "occasional" measurement for both treatments (p less than 0.001) was only faintly reflected by AMBP. Verapamil induced a reduction of nighttime blood pressure with no significant impact on heart rate. The clinical, paraclinical and electrocardiographic safety of both treatments was good.