Search

OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare long-term arrhythmia-free survival between electrical circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and PVI with the endpoint of unexcitability along the ablation line. BACKGROUND PVI is the standard ablation strategy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, although arrhythmia recurrence in long-term follow-up (FU) is high. The endpoint of unexcitability along the ablation line results in decreased arrhythmia recurrence compared to electrical PVI in 1-year FU. METHODS Seventy-four consecutive patients (age 62.5 ± 10.6 years; 70.3% male) with de novo paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who were initially included in our randomized trial and underwent catheter ablation at our institution were analyzed. Patients who were randomized to either a conventional group (PVI, guided by circumferential catheter signals) or a pace-guided group (PG, anatomical ablation line encircling, ablation until loss of pace capture at 10 V, 2-ms pulse width on the ablation line) underwent long-term FU. The primary endpoint was recurrence of any atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia after a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients completed a mean FU period of 5.14 ± 0.98 years. Arrhythmia-free survival without antiarrhythmic drug therapy was significantly higher in the PG group (71.05% vs. 25.81%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, multiple procedure success (1.29 ± 0.61 procedures in PG vs. 1.97 ± 1.06 procedures in conventional group, p < 0.001) was higher in the PG group compared to the conventional group (89.47% vs. 58.06%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS The endpoint of unexcitability along the PVI line improves success rates, resulting in a significant reduction of exposure to invasive procedures in 5-year FU.

BACKGROUND Long-term success rates using ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are disappointing and usually do not exceed 60%. OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare arrhythmia-free survival between pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and a stepwise approach (full defrag) consisting of PVI, ablation of complex fractionated electrograms, and additional linear ablation lines in the setting of atrial tachycardias (AT) in patients with persistent AF after PVI. METHODS From November 2010 to February 2013, 205 patients (151 men; 61.7 ± 10.2 years of age) underwent de novo ablation for persistent AF. Subsequently, patients were prospectively randomized to either PVI alone (n = 78) or full defrag (n = 75), with 52 patients not randomized due to AF termination with the original PVI. The primary endpoint was recurrence of any AT after a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS During the entire study, 241 ablations were performed (mean: 1.59 in the PVI-alone group, 1.55 in the full-defrag group). With the stepwise approach, termination of AF occurred in 45 (60%) patients. However, arrhythmia-free survival did not differ whether patients underwent single or multiple procedures (p = 0.468). Procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and radiofrequency duration were significantly longer in the full-defrag group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A stepwise approach aimed at AF termination does not seem to provide additional benefit over PVI alone in patients with persistent AF, but it is associated with significantly longer procedural and fluoroscopic duration as well as radiofrequency application time. (The Randomized Catheter Ablation of Persist End Atrial Fibrillation Study [CHASE-AF]; NCT01580124).