Search

There is a knowledge gap in understanding how existing office buildings are protecting occupants from exposure to particles from both indoor and outdoor sources. We report a cross-sectional study involving weekly measurements of size-resolved indoor and outdoor particle concentrations in forty commercial building offices in Singapore. The outdoor and indoor particles size distributions were single mode with daytime peak number concentrations at 36.5 nm and 48.7 nm. Outdoor concentrations were significantly greater than indoors for all particle diameters. Indoor particle concentrations were generally low due to: 1) relatively high indoor particle removal (IPR) rates; 2) low indoor source strengths; and 3) low indoor particle of outdoor proportion (IPOP). We found that the ventilation system type had a substantial effect on indoor particle levels, IPR and IPOP. Through linear mixed model analyses, we identified dependencies of IPR rates with the use of MERV13 filters in supply air and filter maintenance frequency, IPOP with the use of MERV13 filters in the fresh air and supply air ducts and low particle source strength with regular daily cleaning presumably due to dust reservoir removal. Lastly, the contribution of outdoor sources was mainly seen for ultrafine and fine particles but less pronounced for coarse particles. This study provided detailed understanding of particle exposure in building offices and their influencing factors, facilitating future research on health impact of particle exposures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

People generally spend more time indoors than outdoors resulting in a higher proportion of exposure to particulate matter (PM) occurring indoors. Consequently, indoor PM levels, in contrast to outdoor PM levels, may have a stronger relationship with lung function. To test this hypothesis, indoor and outdoor PM 2.5 and fungal spore data were simultaneously collected from the homes of forty-four asthmatic children aged 10-16 years. An optical absorption technique was utilized on the collected PM 2.5 mass to obtain concentrations of black carbon (BC) and ultraviolet light absorbing particulate matter, (UVPM; a marker of light absorbing PM 2.5 emitted from smoldering organics). Enrolled children completed spirometry after environmental measurements were made. Given the high correlation between PM 2.5 , BC, and UVPM, principal component analysis was used to obtain uncorrelated summaries of the measured PM. Separate linear mixed-effect models were developed to estimate the association between principal components of the PM variables and spirometry values, as well as the uncorrelated original PM variables and spirometry values. A one-unit increase in the first principal component variable representing indoor PM (predominantly composed of UVPM and PM 2.5 ) was associated with 4.1% decrease (99% CI = -6.9, -1.4) in FEV 1 /FVC ratio. 11.3 μg/m 3 increase in indoor UVPM was associated with 6.4% and 14.7% decrease (99% CI = -10.4, -2.4 and 99% CI = -26.3, -2.9, respectively) in percent predicted FEV 1 /FVC ratio and FEF 25-75 respectively. Additionally, 17.7 μg/m 3 increase in indoor PM 2.5 was associated with 6.1% and 12.9% decrease (99% CI = -10.2, -1.9 and 99% CI = -24.9, -1.0, respectively) in percent predicted FEV 1 /FVC ratio and FEF 25-75 , respectively. Outdoor PM, indoor BC, and indoor fungal spores were not significantly associated with lung function. The results indicate that indoor PM is more strongly associated with lung function in children with asthma as compared with outdoor PM., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)