1. Single- vs. dual-head SPECT for detection of myocardial ischemia and viability in a large study population.
- Author
-
Bucerius J, Joe AY, Lindstaedt I, Manka-Waluch A, Reichmann K, Ezziddin S, Palmedo H, and Biersack HJ
- Subjects
- Coronary Angiography, Female, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction diagnosis, Myocardial Infarction epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thallium Radioisotopes administration & dosage, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon methods, Myocardial Infarction diagnostic imaging, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon instrumentation
- Abstract
Background: As single-head data acquisition for thallium-201 myocardial SPECT is a frequently used method mainly in the outpatient medical care as well as in smaller hospitals, comparison to dual-head data collection is a still discussed issue mainly with regard to quality control and -assurance., Methods: A total of 1334 patients undergoing thallium-201 myocardial SPECT for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and/or viability have been retrospectively analyzed. In 554 patients, a single-head gamma camera (360 degrees rotation) has been applied, whereas a dual-head gamma camera (180 degrees rotation) has been used in 780 patients. Four hundred twenty-six patients received both myocardial SPECT as well as coronary angiography. The diagnostic value of both applied acquisition techniques has been analyzed., Results: Regarding myocardial viability, positive predictive value for the diagnosis of myocardial scar tissue was significantly higher for dual-head- as compared to single-head acquisition. Among the 426 patients undergoing diagnosis of myocardial ischemia, significant differences have only been found with regard to specificity being higher in the single-head acquisition. Diagnosis of myocardial ischemia related to a distinct myocardial perfusion region showed a significantly higher sensitivity of dual-head acquisition for the left anterior descending perfusion area, whereas specificity was significantly higher for single-head acquisition., Conclusions: Our results indicate a beneficial effect of dual-head data collection with regard to sensitivity of the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. In contrast, single-head data acquisition was superior with regard to specificity. However, it is justified to preferably apply dual-head data collection in clinical routine due to the shorter acquisition time leading to an evident time benefit of this acquisition technique.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF