Search

Study Objective: This meta-analysis aimed at identifying the risk factors for and their strengths in predicting difficult mask ventilation (MV) through a systematic approach., Design: Meta-analysis of observational studies., Setting: Operating room., Intervention: Airway- or patient-related risk factors for difficult MV reported in over 20% of eligible studies identified through literature review., Patients: Adults receiving anesthetic induction with requirement of MV., Measurements: Databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 2022. The primary outcomes were the identification of commonly reported risk factors for MV and a comparison of their strengths in difficult MV prediction, while the secondary outcomes were the prevalence of difficult MV in the general population and those with obesity., Main Results: Meta-analysis of 20 observational studies involving 335,846 patients identified 13 risk factors with predictive strengths (all p < 0.05): neck radiation (OR = 5.0, five studies, n = 277,843), increased neck circumference (OR = 4.04, 11 studies, n = 247,871), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (OR = 3.61, 12 studies, n = 331,255), presence of beard (OR = 3.35, 12 studies, n = 295,443), snoring (OR = 3.06, 14 studies, n = 296,105), obesity (OR = 2.99, 11 studies, n = 278,297), male gender (OR = 2.76, 16 studies, n = 320,512), Mallampati score III-IV (OR = 2.36, 17 studies, n = 335,016), limited mouth opening (OR = 2.18, six studies, n = 291,795), edentulous (OR = 2.12, 11 studies, n = 249,821), short thyroid-mental distance (OR = 2.12, six studies, n = 328,311), old age (OR = 2, 11 studies, n = 278,750), and limited neck movement (OR = 1.98, nine studies, n = 155,101). The prevalence of difficult MV was 6.1% (16 studies, n = 334,694) and 14.4% (four studies, n = 1152) in the general population and those with obesity, respectively., Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the strengths of 13 most common risk factors for predicting difficult MV, which may serve as an evidence-based reference for clinicians to incorporate into their daily practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Study Objective: To evaluate compliance of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists with personal hygiene and anesthetic equipment disinfection procedures in Taiwan., Design: Survey instrument., Setting: Anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists working in medical and non-medical centers in Taiwan., Participants: 81 anesthesiologists and 181 nurse anesthetists working in medical and non-medical centers., Measurements and Main Results: Questionnaires were sent to 500 anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists in Taiwan. Two hundred sixty-two (52%) completed questionnaires (127 from medical centers and 135 from non-medical centers). Completed questionnaires were divided into two groups: those from medical centers (Group A) and those from non-medical centers (Group B). There was no significant difference in personal hygienic practices (wearing gloves and washing hands) between Groups A and B. There were significant differences between anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists in wearing gloves (65.3% vs. 82%; P = 0.001) and hand washing (52.6% vs. 70.4%; P = 0.003). Medical center anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists performed better than their non-medical-center counterparts when using disinfection procedures and disinfectants for laryngoscope blades and the cleaning of fiberscopes., Conclusions: Teaching programs should include anesthesia infection control in the curriculum for anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists.

The study was conducted to assess the prevalence of sensitization to latex in a group of women with a high risk for atopy and to determine whether the use of condoms is a relevant risk factor. In a prospective study, 100 atopic women (defined as having specific IgE to common aero- or nutritional allergens) were screened for specific IgE antibodies to latex after delivery: Ten of the 100 women (10%) showed specific IgE to latex. Total IgE concentrations were higher with a history of occupational exposure or of symptoms after contact with latex (p < 0.05, and p < 0.005, respectively), but condom users were not significantly more frequent in the latex-positive group. Our results indicate that prior use of condoms does not appear to be a specific risk factor for sensitization to latex in post-partum women at high-risk for atopy. Latex-free condoms should only be recommended to women already known to be sensitized to latex., (Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.)