Search

Background: Levels of the biomarkers presepsin and procalcitonin are affected by renal function. We evaluated the accuracies of presepsin and procalcitonin levels for diagnosing sepsis in patients with and without acute kidney injury (AKI)., Methods: We evaluated patients with presepsin and procalcitonin data, and classified them into AKI and non-AKI groups based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Each group was then subdivided according to sepsis status for each stage of AKI. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to investigate the accuracies of biomarker levels for diagnosing sepsis., Results: In the non-AKI group, the area under the curves (AUCs) for procalcitonin and presepsin levels were 0.897 and 0.880, respectively (p = .525) and optimal cut-off values were 0.10 ng/ml (sensitivity: 85.1%, specificity: 79.1%) and 240 pg/ml (sensitivity: 80.9%, specificity: 83.2%), respectively. In the stage 3 subgroup, the AUC for procalcitonin (0.946) was significantly higher than that for presepsin (0.768, p < .001). The optimal cut-off values for diagnosing sepsis were 4.07 ng/ml (sensitivity: 87.2%, specificity: 93.5%) for procalcitonin and 500 pg/ml (sensitivity: 89.7%, specificity: 59.7%) for presepsin., Conclusions: In patients with severe AKI, the accuracy of the diagnosis of sepsis with procalcitonin was significantly higher than with presepsin., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The National Kidney Disease Education Program group demonstrated that MDRD equation is sensitive to creatinine measurement error, particularly at higher glomerular filtration rates. Thus, MDRD-based eGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m² should not be reported numerically. However, little is known about the impact of analytical error on CKD-EPI-based estimates. This study aimed at assessing the impact of analytical characteristics (bias and imprecision) of 12 enzymatic and 4 compensated Jaffe previously characterized creatinine assays on MDRD and CKD-EPI eGFR. In a simulation study, the impact of analytical error was assessed on a hospital population of 24084 patients. Ability using each assay to correctly classify patients according to chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages was evaluated. For eGFR between 60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m², both equations were sensitive to analytical error. Compensated Jaffe assays displayed high bias in this range and led to poorer sensitivity/specificity for classification according to CKD stages than enzymatic assays. As compared to MDRD equation, CKD-EPI equation decreases impact of analytical error in creatinine measurement above 90 mL/min/1.73 m². Compensated Jaffe creatinine assays lead to important errors in eGFR and should be avoided. Accurate enzymatic assays allow estimation of eGFR until 90 mL/min/1.73 m² with MDRD and 120 mL/min/1.73 m² with CKD-EPI equation., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)