Search

Purpose: Genetic variants in regions that include the mitochondrial genes thioredoxin reductase 2 (TXNRD2) and malic enzyme 3 (ME3) are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in genome-wide association studies (GWASs). To assess their clinical impact, we investigated whether TXNRD2 and ME3 genetic risk scores (GRSs) are associated with specific glaucoma phenotypes., Design: Cross-sectional study., Participants: A total of 2617 patients with POAG and 2634 control participants from the National Eye Institute Glaucoma Human Genetics Collaboration Hereditable Overall Operational Database (NEIGHBORHOOD) consortium., Methods: All POAG-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TXNRD2 and ME3 loci were identified using GWAS data (P < 0.05). Of these, 20 TXNRD2 and 24 ME3 SNPs were selected after adjusting for linkage disequilibrium. The correlation between SNP effect size and gene expression levels was investigated using the Gene-Tissue Expression database. Genetic risk scores were constructed for each individual using the unweighted sum of TXNRD2, ME3, and TXNRD2 + ME3 combined risk alleles. Age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for POAG diagnosis were calculated per decile for each GRS. Additionally, the clinical features of patients with POAG in the top 1%, 5%, and 10% of each GRS were compared with those in the bottom 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively., Main Outcome Measures: Primary open-angle glaucoma OR per GRS decile, maximum treated intraocular pressure (IOP), and prevalence of paracentral visual field loss among patients with POAG with high versus low GRSs., Results: A larger SNP effect size strongly correlated with higher TXNRD2 and lower ME3 expression levels (r = 0.95 and r = -0.97, respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Individuals in decile 10 of the TXNRD2 + ME3 GRS had the highest odds of POAG diagnosis (OR, 1.79 compared with decile 1; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.30; P < 0.001). Patients with POAG in the top 1% of the TXNRD2 GRS showed higher mean maximum treated IOP compared with the bottom 1% (19.9 mmHg vs. 15.6 mmHg; adjusted P = 0.03). Patients with POAG in the top 1% of the ME3 and TXNRD2 + ME3 GRS showed a higher prevalence of paracentral field loss than the bottom 1% (72.7% vs. 14.3% for ME3 GRS and 88.9% vs. 33.3% for TXNRD2+ME3 GRS; adjusted P = 0.03 for both)., Conclusions: Patients with POAG with higher TXNRD2 and ME3 GRSs showed higher treated IOP and a greater prevalence of paracentral field loss. Functional studies exploring how these variants impact mitochondrial function in patients with glaucoma are warranted., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a degenerative eye disease for which early treatment is critical to mitigate visual impairment and irreversible blindness. POAG-associated loci individually confer incremental risk. Genetic risk score(s) (GRS) could enable POAG risk stratification. Despite significantly higher POAG burden among individuals of African ancestry (AFR), GRS are limited in this population. A recent large-scale, multi-ancestry meta-analysis identified 127 POAG-associated loci and calculated cross-ancestry and ancestry-specific effect estimates, including in European ancestry (EUR) and AFR individuals. We assessed the utility of the 127-variant GRS for POAG risk stratification in EUR and AFR Veterans in the Million Veteran Program (MVP). We also explored the association between GRS and documented invasive glaucoma surgery (IGS)., Design: Cross-sectional study., Participants: MVP Veterans with imputed genetic data, including 5830 POAG cases (445 with IGS documented in the electronic health record) and 64 476 controls., Methods: We tested unweighted and weighted GRS of 127 published risk variants in EUR (3382 cases and 58 811 controls) and AFR (2448 cases and 5665 controls) Veterans in the MVP. Weighted GRS were calculated using effect estimates from the most recently published report of cross-ancestry and ancestry-specific meta-analyses. We also evaluated GRS in POAG cases with documented IGS., Main Outcome Measures: Performance of 127-variant GRS in EUR and AFR Veterans for POAG risk stratification and association with documented IGS., Results: GRS were significantly associated with POAG (P < 5 × 10 -5 ) in both groups; a higher proportion of EUR compared with AFR were consistently categorized in the top GRS decile (21.9%-23.6% and 12.9%-14.5%, respectively). Only GRS weighted by ancestry-specific effect estimates were associated with IGS documentation in AFR cases; all GRS types were associated with IGS in EUR cases., Conclusions: Varied performance of the GRS for POAG risk stratification and documented IGS association in EUR and AFR Veterans highlights (1) the complex risk architecture of POAG, (2) the importance of diverse representation in genomics studies that inform GRS construction and evaluation, and (3) the necessity of expanding diverse POAG-related genomic data so that GRS can equitably aid in screening individuals at high risk of POAG and who may require more aggressive treatment., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: To examine the accuracy of general health cross-walk tables in a clinical sample of patients with spine disorders. Published tables (Schalet BD, Rothrock NE, Hays RD, et al. Linking physical and mental health summary scores from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) to the PROMIS(®) Global Health Scale. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1524-30) link scores from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) to the 10-Item Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), a global health scale metric for both mental (GMH) and physical (GPH) summary scores., Methods: We assessed the accuracy of administered PROMIS and VR-12 scores with scores predicted by cross-walks in 4606 adult patients seen in a spine clinic from October 2015 to 2016. Accuracy of linking scores was evaluated using Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation coefficients, and mean and SD of score differences. Bland-Altman plots were used to graphically assess the levels of agreement. The consistency in scores' discrimination across levels of pain severity, depression, and other patient characteristics was assessed. Bootstrap methods estimated linking precision across varying sample sizes., Results: Actual and cross-walked PROMIS scores showed moderate correlation (ICC(3,1): GMH 0.73; GPH 0.81), with Bland-Altman plots suggesting smaller differences between scores in patients with lower and higher general health. Significant discrimination between patient subgroups was demonstrated reliably by both actual and estimated scores. Bootstrapped resamples indicated adequate precision for 200 patients (95% confidence interval for mean difference: GMH -1.38 to 0.60; GPH 0.39 to 1.93)., Conclusions: VR-12 and PROMIS global health scores can be accurately linked within a sample of patients with spine disorders; nevertheless, bias is high and precision is low for linking on the patient level. Linked scores at the group level for more than 200 patients can be used in comparative effectiveness research and for comparing results across studies., (Copyright © 2018 ISPOR--The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This article describes the rigorous development process and initial feedback of the PRE-ACT (Preparatory Education About Clinical Trials) web-based- intervention designed to improve preparation for decision making in cancer clinical trials., Methods: The multi-step process included stakeholder input, formative research, user testing and feedback. Diverse teams (researchers, advocates and developers) participated including content refinement, identification of actors, and development of video scripts. Patient feedback was provided in the final production period and through a vanguard group (N=100) from the randomized trial., Results: Patients/advocates confirmed barriers to cancer clinical trial participation, including lack of awareness and knowledge, fear of side effects, logistical concerns, and mistrust. Patients indicated they liked the tool's user-friendly nature, the organized and comprehensive presentation of the subject matter, and the clarity of the videos., Conclusion: The development process serves as an example of operationalizing best practice approaches and highlights the value of a multi-disciplinary team to develop a theory-based, sophisticated tool that patients found useful in their decision making process. Practice implications Best practice approaches can be addressed and are important to ensure evidence-based tools that are of value to patients and supports the usefulness of a process map in the development of e-health tools., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The yeast protein Hsl7p is a homologue of Janus kinase binding protein 1, JBP1, a newly characterized protein methyltransferase. In this report, Hsl7p also is shown to be a methyltransferase. It can be crosslinked to [(3)H]S-adenosylmethionine and exhibits in vitro protein methylation activity. Calf histones H2A and H4 and bovine myelin basic protein were methylated by Hsl7p, whereas histones H1, H2B, and H3 and bovine cytochrome c were not. We demonstrated that JBP1 can complement Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a disrupted HSL7 gene as judged by a reduction of the elongated bud phenotype, and a point mutation in the JBP1 S-adenosylmethionine consensus binding sequence eliminated all complementation by JBP1. Therefore, we conclude the yeast protein Hsl7p is a sequence and functional homologue of JBP1. These data provide evidence for an intricate link between protein methylation and macroscopic changes in yeast morphology., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)

As part of an attempt to understand the specific function and role of each subunit in multisubunit protein synthesis factors, we have attempted to identify the nucleotide binding peptides of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF-2). To ensure that the interactions were of a specific nature, two general controls were used: first, other protein factors with characterized GTP binding activity were tested; second, all affinity labeling was checked for nucleotide specificity by protection with the authentic nucleotide at a 10-fold molar excess over the affinity reagent. Results with a number of GTP modifying reagents ([alpha-32P]GTP, [alpha-32P]GDP, oxidized [alpha-32P]GTP, 3'-p-azidobenzoyl-[alpha-32P]GTP, 3'-p-azidobenzoyl-[alpha-32P]GDP, and 5'-p-[8-3H]fluorosulfonylbenzoyl guanosine) indicate that appropriate conditions for both nucleotide and subunit specific labeling have been achieved. Under these conditions all reagents modified the beta subunit of eIF-2. Complementary studies with subunit-deficient forms of eIF-2 also suggest that the beta subunit of eIF-2 is involved with GTP binding. Coupled with other data suggesting that the gamma subunit of eIF-2 might be involved in GTP binding and amino acid sequence data of eIF-2 gamma from which a part of a GTP binding consensus sequence can be localized, support is provided for the concept of alternate GTP binding domains or a GTP binding domain shared between different subunits of eIF-2.