Search

Organophosphate poisoning is associated with a high mortality rate due to respiratory failure, dysrhythmias, and multi-organ failure. We report two cases of survival after "in-the field" antidote treatment of very severe organophosphate poisonings. Two patients orally ingested large amounts of the organophosphorous agent oxydemeton-methyl in suicide attempts, resulting in the hypercholinergic syndrome in both. Resuscitation included early administration of antidote by emergency medical personnel as well as high-dose atropine. Plasma levels of pseudo cholinesterase were initially very low in both patients. Long-term mechanical ventilation was necessary, and both patients developed aspiration pneumonia. At discharge, no major neurological deficits were present. Prompt antidote treatment and aggressive supportive emergency and intensive care unit therapy contribute to improved survival after acute organophosphate poisoning. We believe that in cases of mass poisonings--for example, terrorist activity--therapy must be available on the scene as soon as possible. This also may require decentralized antidote storage.

Recently, we showed that serum beta-trace protein (BTP) is an alternative marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in renal transplant recipients (RTR). We have now developed three BTP-based GFR formulae derived by multiple regression analyses from the patients who had participated in that study. Currently, we validated the diagnostic performance of these BTP-formulae in 102 consecutive RTR who underwent a technetium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) clearance for GFR measurement in comparison to the re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and a recently proposed BTP-based equation (referred to as 'White equation'). The best-performing BTP formula was found to be: GFR = 89.85 x BTP(-0.5541)x urea(-0.3018). This equation estimated true GFR virtually without bias (+0.43 mL/min/1.73 m(2), not significant [NS]), while a small, but significant, overestimation was seen for the MDRD formula (+3.43 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.003). Precision and accuracies within 50% of true GFR (93.1% and 88.2%, respectively) tended to be higher for the BTP formula, but the differences did not reach significance. The White equation overestimated the true GFR by 9.43 mL/min/1.73 m(2)(p = 0.001), and was inferior with respect to precision and 50% accuracy (79.4%). BTP-based GFR calculations are reliable, and may serve as an alternative to the re-expressed MDRD equation.

Cystatin C (Cys C) has been shown to be an alternative marker of renal function. However, estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on Cys C has received little attention. Recently, several Cys C-based equations were developed in different patient cohorts. To date, the benefit of a Cys C-based GFR calculation in patients after renal transplantation (RTx) remains to be elucidated. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of three Cys C-based formulae (Larsson, Hoek, Filler which used an immunonephelometric method) with the results of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured by means of technetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) clearance in 108 consecutive patients after RTx. Correlation coefficients of all calculated GFR estimates with the true GFR were high but did not differ significantly from one another (0.83-0.87). The MDRD and Filler equations overestimated GFR significantly, whereas the Larsson equation significantly underestimated GFR. Bias of the Hoek formula was negligible. Precision of the Hoek (8.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and Larsson equations (9.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) were significantly better than MDRD equations (11.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2); P< or =0.035 each). Accuracy within 30% of real GFR was 67.0 and 65.1% for the MDRD and Filler formulae, and 77.1% for the Larsson and Hoek formulae, respectively. Accuracy within 50% of true GFR for the Hoek formula (97.2%) was better than for the MDRD equations (85.3%). Cys C-based formulae may provide a better diagnostic performance than creatinine-based equations in GFR calculation after RTx.

After renal transplantation monitoring and detection of slight-to-moderate changes in GFR is a prerequisite for an optimal patient management. Recently, several equations to estimate GFR were developed and verified in the MDRD study cohort. However, little is known about the application of the MDRD formulas in the setting of renal transplantation. We prospectively conducted a study of the GFR estimates of the Cockcroft and Gault (C&G), MDRD6-, MDRD7 and the abbreviated MDRD (aMDRD) with the true GFR as measured by (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance in 95 consecutive patients 6.5, 5.3-7.7 years (mean, 95% CI) after renal transplantation. On average the DTPA clearance was 37.4, 34.4-40.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), which differed significantly from estimates of GFR by C&G (52.6, 48.3-56.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), MDRD7 (44.8, 40.7-49.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), MDRD6 (43.8, 39.9-47.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and aMDRD (46.6, 42.4-50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Bias was lowest for MDRD6 (6.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and highest for C&G (15.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Precision was similar for MDRD7 and aMDRD (10.6 and 11.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) but significantly better for MDRD6 (8.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2); p < 0.035). Accuracy within 50% of real GFR was 55.8% for C&G, 83.2% for aMDRD, 87.4% for MDRD7 and 90.5% for MDRD6. MDRD equations perform significantly better than the commonly used C&G formula. Moreover, the MDRD6 equation provides the best diagnostic performance, and should therefore be preferred in renal transplant recipients.