Search

Background: The contemporary frequency and outcomes of antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study., Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and outcomes of ADR use in a large multicenter CTO PCI registry., Methods: The characteristics and outcomes of ADR were examined among 12,568 patients who underwent 12,841 CTO PCIs at 46 U.S. and non-U.S. centers between 2012 and 2023., Results: ADR was used in 2,385 of the procedures (18.6%). ADR use declined from 37.9% in 2012 to 14.5% in 2022 (P < 0.001). Patients in whom ADR was used had a high prevalence of comorbidities. Compared with cases that did not use ADR, ADR cases had more complex angiographic characteristics, higher mean J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score (2.94 ± 1.11 vs 2.23 ± 1.26; P < 0.001), lower technical success (77.0% vs 89.3%; P < 0.001), and higher in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (3.7% vs 1.6%; P < 0.001). The use of the CrossBoss declined from 71% in 2012 to 1.4% in 2022 and was associated with higher technical success (87%) compared with wire-based techniques (73%). The Stingray device displayed higher technical success (86%) compared with subintimal tracking and re-entry (STAR) (74%) and limited antegrade subintimal tracking (78%); however, its use has been decreasing, with STAR becoming the most used re-entry technique in 2022 (44% STAR vs 38% Stingray)., Conclusions: The use of ADR has been decreasing. ADR was used in more complex lesions and was associated with lower technical success and higher major adverse cardiac events compared with non-ADR cases. There has been a decrease in Stingray use and an increase in the use of STAR for re-entry., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Ybarra is a consultant for SoundBite Medical; and has received speaker honoraria for Abbott Vascular. Dr Rinfret is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, and SoundBite Medical; has received fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and SoundBite Medical; and has been a consultant for Teleflex. Dr Choi is an advisory board member for Medtronic. Dr Poommipanit is a consultant for Asahi Intecc and Abbott Vascular. Dr Khatri has received personal honoraria for proctoring and speaking from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, Shockwave, and Boston Scientific. Dr Davies has received speaking honoraria from Abiomed, Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Shockwave and Teleflex; and serves on advisory boards for Abiomed, Avinger, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Rampart. Dr Jaffer has conducted sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, and Boston Scientific; has been a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, IMDS, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, and Intravascular Imaging; has equity interest in Intravascular Imaging and DurVena; and has the right to receive royalties through Massachusetts General Hospital licensing arrangements with Terumo, Canon, and SpectraWAVE. Dr Jaber has received consulting fees from Medtronic; and has received proctoring fees from Abbott. Dr Nicholson has been a proctor and a Speakers Bureau and advisory board member for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc; and has intellectual property with Vascular Solutions. Dr Azzalini has received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare, Asahi Intecc, Philips, Abbott Vascular, Reflow Medical, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr Alaswad has been a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr Abi-Rafeh has received proctor and speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific and Shockwave Medical. Dr ElGuindy has received consulting honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo; and has received proctorship fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo. Dr Allana is a consultant for Abiomed and Boston Scientific. Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), Cardiovascular Systems, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, Teleflex, and Terumo; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is an owner of Hippocrates; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with lower success and higher complication rates when compared with the antegrade approach., Objectives: This study sought to assess contemporary techniques and outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI., Methods: We examined the baseline characteristics, procedural techniques and outcomes of 4,058 retrograde CTO PCIs performed at 44 centers between 2012 and 2023. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included any of the following in-hospital events: death, myocardial infarction, repeat target vessel revascularization, pericardiocentesis, cardiac surgery, and stroke., Results: The average J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score was 3.1 ± 1.1. Retrograde crossing was successful in 60.5% and lesion crossing in 81.6% of cases. The collaterals pathways successfully used were septals in 62.0%, saphenous vein grafts in 17.4%, and epicardials in 19.1%. The technical and procedural success rates were 78.7% and 76.6%, respectively. When retrograde crossing failed, technical success was achieved in 50.3% of cases using the antegrade approach. In-hospital MACE was 3.5%. The clinical coronary perforation rate was 5.8%. The incidence of in-hospital MACE with retrograde true lumen crossing, just marker antegrade crossing, conventional reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART), contemporary reverse CART, extended reverse CART, guide-extension reverse CART, and CART was 2.1%, 0.8%, 5.5%, 3.0%, 2.1%, 3.2%, and 4.1%, respectively; P = 0.01)., Conclusions: Retrograde CTO PCI is utilized in highly complex cases and yields moderate success rates with 5.8% perforation and 3.5% periprocedural MACE rates. Among retrograde crossing strategies, retrograde true lumen puncture was the safest. There is need for improvement of the efficacy and safety of retrograde CTO PCI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation; Science Center for Coronary Artery Disease (CCAD) helped support this research project. Study data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture. (REDCap) electronic data capture tools hosted at the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (MHIF), Minneapolis, Minnesota. Dr Allana has been a consultant for Boston Scientific and Abiomed. D. Choi has received speaking honoraria from Shockwave. Dr Alaswad has been a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Dr Davies has received speaking honoraria from Abiomed, Asahi Intec, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Siemens Healthineers, Shockwave, and Teleflex; and has served on advisory boards for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Rampart. Dr Karmpaliotis has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed; Equity: Saranas, Soundbite, and Traverse Vascular. Dr Jaffer has received research funding from Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, Boston Scientific, HeartFlow, and Amarin; has been a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, International Medical Device Solutions, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, Intravascular Imaging, and DurVena; holds equity interest in Intravascular Imaging Inc, Massachusetts General Hospital, and DurVena; and has licensing arrangements with Terumo, Canon, and Spectrawave, for which he hast he right to receive royalties. Dr Khatri has received honoraria for proctoring and speaking from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Poommipanit has been a consultant for Medtronic, Asahi Intecc, and Abbott Vascular. Dr Azzalini has received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare, Asahi Intecc, Philips, Abbott Vascular, Reflow Medical, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr Nicholson has been a proctor and is on Speakers Bureau and advisory boards for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc; and holds intellectual property with Vascular Solutions. Dr Jaber has received consulting fees from Inari Medical and Medtronic. Dr Rinfret has been a consultant for Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Medtronic, Abbott, and Abiomed. Dr Brilakis has received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (as associate editor of Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (board of directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is the owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary calcification is common and increases the difficulty of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We examined the impact of calcium on procedural outcomes of 13,079 CTO PCIs performed in 12,799 patients at 46 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2023., Results: Moderate or severe calcification was present in 46.6% of CTO lesions. Patients whose lesions were calcified were older and more likely to have had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Calcified lesions were more complex with higher J-CTO score (3.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.2; p < 0.001) and lower technical (83.0% vs. 89.9%; p < 0.001) and procedural (81.0% vs. 89.1%; p < 0.001) success rates compared with mildly calcified or non-calcified CTO lesions. The retrograde approach was more commonly used among cases with moderate/severe calcification (40.3% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001). Balloon angioplasty (76.6%) was the most common lesion preparation technique for calcified lesions, followed by rotational atherectomy (7.3%), laser atherectomy (3.4%) and, intravascular lithotripsy (3.4%). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was higher in cases with moderate or severe calcification (3.0% vs. 1.2%; p < 0.001), as was the incidence of perforation (6.5% vs. 3.4%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the presence of moderate/severe calcification was independently associated with lower technical success (odds ratio, OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.84) and higher MACE (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.66-3.27)., Conclusions: Moderate/severe calcification was present in nearly half of CTO lesions, and was associated with higher utilization of the retrograde approach, lower technical and procedural success rates, and higher incidence of in-hospital MACE., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Distal vessel quality is a key parameter in the global chronic total occlusion (CTO) crossing algorithm., Objectives: The study sought to evaluate the association of distal vessel quality with the outcomes of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 10,028 CTO percutaneous coronary interventions performed at 39 U.S. and non-U.S. centers between 2012 and 2022. A poor-quality distal vessel was defined as <2 mm diameter or with significant diffuse atherosclerotic disease. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat target vessel revascularization, tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or surgery, and stroke., Results: A total of 33% of all CTO lesions had poor-quality distal vessel. When compared with good-quality distal vessels, CTO lesions with a poor-quality distal vessel had higher J-CTO (Japanese chronic total occlusion) scores (2.7 ± 1.1 vs 2.2 ± 1.3; P < 0.01), lower technical (79.9% vs 86.9%; P < 0.01) and procedural (78.0% vs 86.8%; P < 0.01) success, and higher incidence of MACE (2.5% vs 1.7%; P < 0.01) and perforation (6.4% vs 3.7%; P < 0.01). A poor-quality distal vessel was independently associated with technical failure and MACE. Poor-quality distal vessels were associated with higher use of the retrograde approach (25.2% vs 14.9%; P < 0.01) and higher air kerma radiation dose (2.4 [IQR: 1.3-4.0] Gy vs 2.0 [IQR: 1.1-3.5] Gy; P < 0.01)., Conclusions: A poor-quality distal vessel in CTO lesions is associated with higher lesion complexity, higher need for retrograde crossing, lower technical and procedural success, higher incidence of MACE and coronary perforation, and higher radiation dose., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors are grateful for the philanthropic support of the generous anonymous donors, and the philanthropic support of Drs Mary Ann and Donald A. Sens, Mrs. Diane and Dr Cline Hickok, Mrs Wilma and Mr Dale Johnson, the Mrs Charlotte and Mr Jerry Golinvaux Family Fund, the Roehl Family Foundation, and the Joseph Durda Foundation. The generous gifts of these donors to the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation and Center for Coronary Artery Disease helped support this research project. Dr Allana has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation. Dr Alaswad has served as a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Dr Karmpaliotis has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, and Abiomed; and owns equity in Saranas, Soundbite, and Traverse Vascular. Dr Jaffer has conducted sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, Boston Scientific, HeartFlow, and Amarin; has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, International Medical Device Solutions, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, Intravascular Imaging, and DurVena; owns equity interest in Intravascular Imaging Inc and DurVena; and his employer, Massachusetts General Hospital, has licensing arrangements with Terumo, Canon, and Spectrawave, for which he has the right to receive royalties. Dr Khatri has received personal honoraria for proctoring and speaking for Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Poommipanit has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Asahi Intecc, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific. Dr Patel has received consulting honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr Mahmud has served as a consultant for Abiomed, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and has served as chair for multiple Data, Safety and Monitoring Boards. Dr Nicholson has served as a proctor and on the Speakers Bureau and advisory board for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc; and owns reports intellectual property with Vascular Solutions. Dr Jaber received received research and educational funds from Medtronic, Inari Medical; has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Inari Medical; has received a proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular; and has served on the advisory board for Medtronic. Dr Rinfret has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific Corporation, SoundBite Medical, and Teleflex. Dr Abi-Rafeh has served as a proctor for and received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr ElGuindy has received consulting honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Abbott; proctorship fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo; and educational grants from Medtronic. Dr Sandoval has served on the advisory board for Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Diagnostics without personal compensation; and as a speaker without personal financial compensation for Abbott Diagnostics. Dr Burke has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Brilakis has received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor for Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is the owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder for MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation's Science Center for Coronary Artery Disease (CCAD) helped support this research project. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Allana is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Bortnick, Boston Scientific, the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), Cardiovascular Systems, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is the owner of Hippocrates; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Brilakis has received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is an owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder of MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a considerable risk of complications, and risk stratification is of utmost importance., Aims: To assess the clinical usefulness of the recently developed PROGRESS-CTO (NCT02061436) complication risk scores in an independent cohort., Methods: Individual patient data pooled analysis of 3 registries was performed., Results: Of the 4569 patients who underwent CTO PCI, 102 (2.2%) had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Patients with MACE were older (69 ± 11 vs. 65 ± 10, p < 0.001), more likely to have a history of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and unfavorable angiographic characteristics J-CTO score (2.4 ± 1.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, p = 0.007), including blunt stump (59% vs. 49%, p = 0.047). Technical success was lower in patients with MACE (59% vs. 86%, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the PROGRESS-CTO complication risk models were as follows: MACE 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.76), mortality 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.85), and pericardiocentesis 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62-0.77) in the validation dataset. The observed complication rates increased with higher PROGRESS-CTO complication scores. The PROGRESS-CTO MACE score showed good calibration in this external cohort, with MACE rates similar to the original study: 0.7% (score 0-1), 1.5% (score 2), 2.2% (score 3), 3.8% (score 4), 4.9% (score 5), 5.8% (score 6-7)., Conclusion: Given the good discriminative performance, calibration, and ease of calculation, the PROGRESS-CTO complication scores could help assess the risk of complications in patients undergoing CTO PCI., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and iodinated contrast shortage may have affected interventional cardiology (IC) fellowship training., Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the educational experience of first-year IC fellows in the United States and Canada., Methods: A 59-question online survey was conducted among 2021-2022 first-year IC fellows in the United States and Canada., Results: Of the 360 IC fellows invited to participate, 111 (31%) responded; 95% were from the United States, and 79% were men. Participants were mostly from university programs (70%), spent 61 to 70 hours/week in the hospital, and had an annual percutaneous coronary intervention case number of <200 (5%), 200 to 249 (8%), 250 to 349 (33%), 350 to 499 (39%), 500 to 699 (12%), or ≥700 (3%). For femoral access, a micropuncture needle was used regularly by 89% and ultrasound-guided puncture by 81%, and 43% used vascular closure devices in most cases (>80%). Intravascular ultrasound was performed and interpreted very comfortably by 62% and optical coherence tomography (OCT) by 32%, and 20% did not have access to OCT. Approximately one-third felt very comfortable performing various atherectomy techniques. Covered stents, fat embolization, and coil embolization were used very comfortably by 14%, 4%, and 3%, respectively. Embolic protection devices were used very comfortably by 11% to 24% of IC fellows. Almost one-quarter of fellows (24%) were warned about their high radiation exposure. Eighty-four percent considered IC fellowship somewhat or very stressful, and 16% reported inadequate psychological support., Conclusions: This survey highlights opportunities for improvement with regard to the use of intravascular imaging, atherectomy techniques, complication prevention and management strategies, radiation awareness and mitigation, and psychological support., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors are grateful for the philanthropic support of their generous anonymous donors and the philanthropic support of Drs Mary Ann and Donald A. Sens, Mrs Diane and Dr Cline Hickok, Mrs Wilma and Mr Dale Johnson, the Mrs Charlotte and Mr Jerry Golinvaux Family Fund, the Roehl Family Foundation, and the Joseph Durda Foundation. The generous gifts of these donors to the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation’s Science Center for Coronary Artery Disease helped support this research project. Dr Azzalini has received honoraria from Teleflex, Abiomed, Asahi Intecc, Philips, GE Healthcare, Abbott Vascular, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr Sandoval previously served on the advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Diagnostics without personal compensation; and has been a speaker without personal financial compensation for Abbott Diagnostics. Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, Cardiovascular Systems, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, Interventional Medical Device Solutions, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; is an owner of Hippocrates; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures and Cleerly Health. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are limited data on the limited antegrade subintimal tracking (LAST) technique for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of use and outcomes of the LAST technique for CTO PCI., Methods: We analyzed 2,177 CTO PCIs performed using antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) in the PROGRESS-CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) registry between 2012 and January 2022 at 39 centers. ADR was attempted in 1,465 cases (67.3%)., Results: Among antegrade re-entry cases, LAST was used in 163 (11.1%) (primary LAST in 127 [8.7%] and secondary LAST [LAST after other ADR approaches failed] in 36 [2.5%]), the Stingray system (Boston Scientific) in 980 (66.9%), subintimal tracking and re-entry in 387 (26.4%), and contrast-guided subintimal tracking and re-entry in 29 (2.0%). The mean patient age was 65.2 ± 10 years, and 85.8% were men. There was no significant difference in technical (71.8% vs 77.8%; P = 0.080) and procedural (69.9% vs 75.3%; P = 0.127) success and major cardiac adverse events (1.84% vs 3.53%; P = 0.254) between LAST and non-LAST cases. However, on multivariable analysis, the use of LAST was associated with lower procedural success (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.91). Primary LAST was associated with higher technical (76.4% vs 55.6%; P = 0.014) and procedural (75.6% vs 50.0%; P = 0.003) success and similar major adverse cardiac event (1.57% vs 2.78%; P = 0.636) rates compared with secondary LAST., Conclusions: LAST was used in 11.1% of antegrade re-entry CTO PCI cases and was associated with lower procedural success on multivariable analysis, suggesting a limited role of LAST in contemporary CTO PCI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by many philanthropy partners, including our anonymous donors, Drs Mary Ann and Donald A. Sens, Ms Dianne and Dr Cline Hickok, Ms Charlotte and Mr Jerry Golinvaux Family Fund, the Roehl Family Foundation, and the Joseph Durda Foundation, and Ms Wilma and Mr Dale Johnson. Dr Alaswad is a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr Karmpaliotis has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific; and has equity in Saranas, Soundbite, and Traverse Vascular. Dr Kirtane is a consultant for Interventional Medical Device Solutions; and has received travel expenses/meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron. Dr Jaffer has received sponsored research support from Canon, Siemens, Teleflex, Shockwave, Amarin, Mercator, Boston Scientific, and HeartFlow; is a consultant/speaker for Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Siemens, Magenta Medical, Interventional Medical Device Solutions, and Philips; and holds equity in Intravascular Imaging, Inc and DurVena, Inc. Massachusetts General Hospital has a patent licensing arrangement with Terumo, Canon, and Spectrawave. Dr Kandzari has received institutional research/grant support from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Medtronic, Orbus Neich, and Teleflex; and has received personal consulting honoraria from Biotronik, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, and Medtronic. Dr Poommipanit is a consultant for Asahi Intecc, Abbott, and Vascular-Consultant. Dr Khatri received honoraria from Asahi Intecc; and is a speaker and proctor for Abbott Vascular. Dr ElGuindy has received consultancy and proctorship fees from Medtronic, Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, and Terumo. Dr Abi Rafeh is a speaker for Boston scientific and Shockwave Medical. Dr Burke is a shareholder in Egg Medical and MHI Ventures. Dr Brilakis has received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, Interventional Medical Device Solutions, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; provides research support for Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is an owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Preprocedural coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be useful in procedural planning for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We examined the clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics and outcomes of cases with vs. without preprocedural CCTA in PROGRESS-CTO (NCT02061436). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding factors., Results: Of 7034 CTO PCI cases, preprocedural CCTA was used in 375 (5.3%) with increasing frequency over time. Patients with preprocedural CCTA had a higher prevalence of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (39% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and angiographically unfavorable characteristics including higher prevalence of proximal cap ambiguity (52% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) and moderate/severe calcification (59% vs. 41%, p < 0.001) compared with those without CCTA. CCTA helped resolve proximal cap ambiguity in 27%, identified significant calcium not seen on diagnostic angiography in 18%, changed estimated CTO length by >5 mm in 10%, and was performed as part of initial coronary artery disease work up in 19%. CCTA cases had higher J-CTO (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) and PROGRESS-CTO (1.3 ± 1.0 vs. 1.2 ± 1.0 p = 0.027) scores. After adjusting for potential confounders, cases with preprocedural CCTA had similar technical success (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.67) and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR: 1.47, 95% CI, 0.72-3.00)., Conclusion: Preprocedural CCTA was used in ~5% of CTO PCI cases. While CCTA may help with procedural planning, especially in complex cases, technical success and MACE were similar with or without CCTA., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Jaffer: Sponsored research: Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, Boston Scientific; Consultant: Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, IMDS, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, Intravascular Imaging. Equity interest – Intravascular Imaging Inc., DurVena. Massachusetts General Hospital – licensing arrangements: Terumo, Canon, Spectrawave, for which FAJ has right to receive royalties. Dr. Doshi: speaker's bureau for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic and research support from Biotronik. Dr. Alaswad: consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI. Dr. Khatri: Personal Honoria for proctoring and speaking: Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Terumo, Boston Scientific. Dr. Davies: honoraria/consulting from Medtronic, Seimens Healthineers and Asahi intec. Dr. Mitul Patel: Consulting Honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr. Rinfret: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, and SoundBite Medical. Dr. Jaber: Member of the advisory board for Medtronic and has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Nicholson: reports speakers bureau, consulting, honoraria, advisory board for Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, Corindus/Siemens, and Medtronic. Dr. Abi Rafeh: CTO Proctor and consultant for Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr. ElGuindy: Consulting Honoraria: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Abbott; Proctorship fees: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Terumo; Educational grants: Medtronic. Dr. Brilakis: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; research support: Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; owner, Hippocrates LLC; shareholder: MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical. Others: None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prevalence, treatment, and outcomes of balloon undilatable lesions encountered in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study., Methods: We examined the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of balloon undilatable lesions in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436)., Results: Of 6535 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2022, 558 (8.5%) lesions were balloon undilatable. In this subset, patients were older (mean age 67 ± 10 vs. 64 ± 10, p < 0.001) and had higher prevalence of comorbidities: diabetes mellitus (54% vs. 40%, p < 0.001), prior PCI (71% vs. 59%, p < 0.001), prior myocardial infarction (52% vs. 45%, p = 0.003), and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (44% vs. 25%, p < 0.001). The CTO lesion length was estimated to be 34 ± 23 mm, mean J-CTO score was 2.9 ± 1.1 and mean PROGRESS-CTO score was 1.4 ± 1.0. A cutting balloon was used in 27%, a scoring balloon in 15%, laser in 14%, rotational atherectomy in 28%, orbital atherectomy in 10%, intravascular lithotripsy in 1% and other modalities/approaches in 5%. Balloon undilatable lesions had lower technical success (90.9% vs. 93.8%, p = 0.007) and higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (composite of in-hospital death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, re-PCI, emergency CABG, and pericardiocentesis) (5.0% versus 1.3%, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 12 CTO (8.5%) lesions are balloon undilatable. Treatment of balloon undilatable lesions is associated with lower technical success and higher in-hospital MACE., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with increased risk of periprocedural complications. Estimating the risk of complications facilitates risk-benefit assessment and procedural planning., Objectives: This study sought to develop risk scores for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), mortality, pericardiocentesis, and acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing CTO PCI., Methods: The study analyzed the PROGRESS-CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention; NCT02061436) and created risk scores for MACE, mortality, pericardiocentesis, and acute MI. Logistic regression prediction modeling was used to identify independently associated variables, and models were internally validated with bootstrapping., Results: The incidence of periprocedural complications among 10,480 CTO PCIs was as follows: MACE 215 (2.05%), mortality 47 (0.45%), pericardiocentesis 83 (1.08%), and acute MI 66 (0.63%). The final model for MACE included ≥65 years of age (1 point), moderate-severe calcification (1 point), blunt stump (1 point), antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) (1 point), female (2 points), and retrograde (2 points); the final model for mortality included ≥65 years of age (1 point), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (1 point), moderate-severe calcification (1 point), ADR (1 point), and retrograde (1 point); the final model for pericardiocentesis included ≥65 years of age (1 point), female (1 point), moderate-severe calcification (1 point), ADR (1 point), and retrograde (2 points); the final model for acute MI included prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (1 point), atrial fibrillation (1 point), and blunt stump (1 point). The C-statistics of the models were 0.74, 0.80, 0.78, 0.72 for MACE, mortality, pericardiocentesis, and acute MI, respectively., Conclusions: The PROGRESS-CTO complication risk scores can facilitate estimation of the periprocedural complication risk in patients undergoing CTO PCI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors are grateful for the philanthropic support of our generous anonymous donors, and the philanthropic support of Drs. Mary Ann and Donald A. Sens, Mrs. Diane and Dr Cline Hickok, Mrs. Wilma and Mr. Dale Johnson, Mrs. Charlotte and Mr. Jerry Golinvaux Family Fund, the Roehl Family Foundation, and the Joseph Durda Foundation. The generous gifts of these donors to the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation's Science Center for Coronary Artery Disease helped support this research project. Dr Alaswad has served as a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI. Dr Davies has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Siemens Healthineers, and Shockwave Medical. Dr ElGuindy has received consulting honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Abbott; proctorship fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo; and educational grants from Medtronic. Dr Patel has received consulting honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr Abi Rafeh has served as a CTO proctor and consultant for Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr Karmpaliotis has received honoraria from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular; and owns equity in Saranas, Soundbite, and Traverse Vascular. Dr Khatri has received personal honoraria for proctoring and speaking from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Terumo, and Boston Scientific. Dr Jaffer has performed sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, and Boston Scientific; has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, IMDS, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, and Intravascular Imaging; owns equity interest in Intravascular Imaging and DurVena; and his employer (Massachusetts General Hospital) has licensing arrangements with Terumo, Canon, and Spectrawave, for which Dr Jaffer has right to receive royalties. Dr Doshi has served on the Speakers Bureau for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; and received research support from Biotronik. Dr Jaber has served on the advisory board for Medtronic; and received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr Yeh has received grant or contract support from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, BD Bard, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Medtronic, and Philips; and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Shockwave Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Burke is a stockholder of MHI Ventures and Egg Medical. Dr Brilakis has received consulting or speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific, and GE Healthcare; is the owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder of MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Infraredx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is an owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.