Search

Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) have markedly elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels that are refractory to standard doses of lipid-lowering drug therapy. In the present study we evaluated the effect of atorvastatin on steady state concentrations of plasma lipids and mevalonic acid (MVA), as well as on 24-h urinary excretion of MVA in patients with well characterized HoFH. Thirty-five HoFH patients (18 males; 17 females) received 40 mg and then 80 mg atorvastatin/day. The dose of atorvastatin was increased further to 120 mg/day in 20 subjects and to 160 mg/day in 13 subjects who had not achieved LDL cholesterol goal, or in whom the dose of atorvastatin had not exceeded 2.5 mg/kg body wt per day. LDL cholesterol levels were reduced by 17% at the 40 mg/day and by 28% at the 80 mg/day dosage (P<0.01). Reduction in LDL cholesterol in the five receptor negative patients was similar to that achieved in the 30 patients with residual LDL receptor activity. Plasma MVA and 24-h urinary excretion of MVA, as markers of in vivo cholesterol synthesis, were elevated at baseline and decreased markedly with treatment. Urinary MVA excretion decreased by 57% at the 40 mg/day dose and by 63% at the 80 mg/day dosage (P<0. 01). There was a correlation between reduction in LDL cholesterol and reduction in urinary MVA excretion; those patients with the highest basal levels of MVA excretion and thus the highest rates of cholesterol synthesis having the greatest reduction in LDL cholesterol (r=0.38; P=0.02). Increasing the dose of atorvastatin to 120 and 160 mg/day did not result in any further reduction in LDL cholesterol or urinary MVA excretion suggesting a plateau effect with no further inhibition of cholesterol synthesis at doses of atorvastatin greater than 80 mg/day.

We have examined a naturally occurring mutation in the promoter region of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene of a South African Black patient with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The mutation constitutes a 3-bp deletion at nucleotide position -92 (FH Pedi-2) in the distal Sp1 binding site in repeat 1 of the LDLR promoter. The patient carries a second mutant LDLR allele containing a 1-bp deletion in exon 2 (FH Pedi-1) that gives rise to a frameshift mutation. Consistent with low receptor activity previously observed in cultured fibroblasts from the patient (5-15%), the rate of LDL receptor synthesis was markedly reduced to less than 20% of normal. DNase I footprint analysis indicated that the -92 mutation abolished binding of Sp1 to repeat 1 in the LDLR promoter. Transcription studies in transfected cells using normal and mutant promoter fragments linked to a luciferase reporter gene demonstrated that the promoter fragment containing the -92 mutation had approximately 10% of normal promoter activity. These findings indicate that the distal Sp1 binding site is essential for maximal activity of the normal intact LDLR promoter.

Two novel point mutations have been identified in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene of a South African Indian patient with a clinical diagnosis of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The patient is a compound heterozygote, whose paternally-inherited allele has a single base substitution of A to T at position + 1. This conversion of the initiation codon ATG (methionine) to TTG (leucine) would abolish initiation of translation at the normal site, and consequently the synthesis of any normal LDLR molecules. The second mutation identified is a C to A base change at nucleotide position 1176 in exon 8, which creates a stop codon at cysteine-371. Except for previously-described polymorphisms in specific regions of the LDLR gene, the mutations identified in exons 1 and 8 were the only variants observed by screening enzymatically amplified genomic DNA comprising the entire coding and promoter region of the LDLR gene by combined heteroduplex-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and by direct sequencing. Cultured cells from the proband expressed no functional LDLR activity and contained no receptor protein that could be detected by antibody binding. These findings are consistent with the nature of the two base changes identified and provide evidence that the mutations cause FH in the proband and his affected family members. The mutations, designated M-21L and C371X, were absent in 17 apparently unrelated Indian hypercholesterolemics and 200 normal chromosomes screened.

DNA screening for apolipoprotein (apo) B mutations causing familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 (FDB) was performed in 87 hyperlipidemic Belgian individuals using heteroduplex analysis. Eighteen FDB heterozygotes from 5 unrelated families were identified. Three of the index cases reported an early family history of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). The frequency of the apo B3500 mutation was 8% in Belgians with type IIa hyperlipidemia, indicating that the prevalence of FDB may be as high as 1 in 250 in the general Belgian population. Plasma lipid levels of the patients identified in the present study are similar to those previously reported for FDB heterozygotes. We compared these data with results obtained in a genotype/phenotype correlation study of heterozygous familial hyper-cholesterolemia (FH) in the Afrikaner population of South Africa. Plasma cholesterol levels in FDB heterozygotes were similar to those reported for FH heterozygotes with defective receptors (Asp206-->Glu, approximately 20% normal receptor activity), but significantly lower than in FH heterozygotes with a mutant protein which virtually lacks receptor activity (Val408-->Met, < 2% normal receptor activity). FDB appears to be a significant genetic cause of hypercholesterolemia in Belgium.