Search

Objective: Aspects of the written application, interview and ranking may negatively impact recruitment of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) applicants. Our objectives were to explore knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pediatric faculty who assess potential trainees and how diversity impacts these assessments., Methods: We performed qualitative interviews of 20 geographically diverse faculty at large pediatric residencies and fellowships. We analyzed data using the constant comparative method to develop themes., Results: Four main themes emerged., Conclusions: We describe ways in which bias infiltrates recruitment and strategies to promote diversity. Many strategies are variably implemented and the impact on workforce diversity in pediatric training programs remains unknown., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors have received support from the following for the production of this manuscript:, (Copyright © 2023 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe differences in agentic (achievement) and communal (relationship) terms in letters of recommendation (LORs) for pediatric residency candidates by applicant and letter writer demographics and to examine if LOR language is associated with interview status., Methods: A random sample of applicant profiles and LORs submitted to one institution were analyzed from the 2020-21 Match. Letters of recommendation text was inputted into a customized natural language processing application which determined the frequency of agentic and communal words in each LOR. Neutral LORs were defined as having< 5% surplus of agentic or communal terms., Results: We analyzed 2094 LORs from 573 applicants: 78% were women, 24% were under-represented in medicine (URiM), and 39% were invited to interview. Most letter writers were women (55%) and of senior academic rank (49%). Overall, 53% of LORs were agency biased, 25% communal biased, and 23% neutral. There was no difference in agency and communally biased LORs by an applicant's gender (men 53% agentic vs women 53% agentic, P = .424), race or ethnicity (non-URiM 53% agentic vs URiM 51% agentic, P = .631). Male letter writers used significantly more agentic terms (8.5%) compared to women (6.7% agentic) or writers of both genders (3.1% communal) (P = .008). Applicants invited to interview were more likely to have a neutral LOR; however, no significant association existed between language and interview status., Conclusions: No significant differences in language were found by applicant gender or race among pediatric residency candidates. Identifying potential biases within pediatric residency selection processes is important in creating an equitable approach to application review., (Copyright © 2023 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Components of trainee applications may introduce bias based on race or gender. Behavior-based interviews (BBIs) rely on structured questions to elicit applicants' past experiences to predict future behavior. Our objective was to implement BBIs in one fellowship program and compare applicant assessment by race and gender when using a standardized assessment tool versus a BBI-based tool., Methods: In 2019 and 2020, we developed BBIs and BBI-specific assessments; 6 of 15 faculty were trained in this interview method. Applicants completed 6 interviews with either a BBI or unstructured format. All faculty completed a standardized assessment on applicants. BBI faculty also completed a BBI-specific assessment. Normalized average scores were calculated and used to rank applicants into quartiles. Race was categorized into White, underrepresented minorities (URMs; Black and Hispanics), and non-URMs (all others). Faculty and applicants were surveyed about BBIs., Results: Seventy-five applicants were interviewed. Significant differences were found in standardized assessment scores (White 1.01 +/- 0.09, non-URM 1.02 +/- 0.08, URM .94 +/- 0.07; P = .02) and quartiles by race (P = .05), but not for BBI scores (White 0.98 +/- 0.09, non-URM 1.03 +/- 0.09, URM 1.02 +/- 0.1; P = .18) or quartiles by race (P = .17). There were no significant differences in score or quartile by gender for either tool. The majority of faculty and applicant survey respondents commented positively about BBIs., Conclusion: BBIs were successfully implemented and generally reviewed positively by faculty and applicants. BBIs reduced racial differences in applicant assessments. Applicant assessment may benefit from structured tools to mitigate potential biases., (Copyright © 2021 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: No standardized evaluation tool for fellowship applicant assessment exists. Assessment tools are subject to biases and scoring tendencies which can skew scores and impact rankings. We aimed to develop and evaluate an objective assessment tool for fellowship applicants., Methods: We detected rater effects in our numerically scaled assessment tool (NST), which consisted of 10 domains rated from 0 to 9. We evaluated each domain, consolidated redundant categories, and removed subjective categories. For 7 remaining domains, we described each quality and developed a question with a behaviorally-anchored rating scale (BARS). Applicants were rated by 6 attendings. Ratings from the NST in 2018 were compared with the BARS from 2020 for distribution of data, skewness, and inter-rater reliability., Results: Thirty-four applicants were evaluated with the NST and 38 with the BARS. Demographics were similar between groups. The median score on the NST was 8 out of 9; scores <5 were used in less than 1% of all evaluations. Distribution of data was improved in the BARS tool. In the NST, scores from 6 of 10 domains demonstrated moderate skewness and 3 high skewness. Three of the 7 domains in the BARS showed moderate skewness and none had high skewness. Two of 10 domains in the NST vs 5 of 7 domains in the BARS achieved good inter-rater reliability., Conclusion: Replacing a standard numeric scale with a BARS normalized the distribution of data, reduced skewness, and enhanced inter-rater reliability in our evaluation tool. This provides some validity evidence for improved applicant assessment and ranking., (Copyright © 2021 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To examine differences in utilization across health care settings among children by body mass index (BMI) categories to help identify opportunities for interventions., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using 1 year of electronic health records following an index primary care visit for children 3 to 17 years old in 2016. Index visits occurred at >40 pediatric practices affiliated with a Northeastern health system. Using normal BMI as a reference group, we examined the extent to which children's BMI percentile categories were associated with primary care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and ED visit acuity. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance status were used as covariates., Results: Of those with biologically plausible values for height and weight (n = 30,352), the prevalences of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity were 16.3%, 12.4%, and 5.7%, respectively. Children outside of the normal BMI range made more primary care visits; however, relative patterns of ED utilization were not consistent. Children with obesity versus normal BMI were less likely to have ED visits of high acuity. Risk of hospitalization was higher among children with overweight or severe obesity., Conclusions: Children's BMI categories were associated with health care utilization, specifically primary care visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations. Further investigation is needed to explore the drivers of these differences in utilization, such as the impact of stigma and perceived weight bias on care-seeking patterns, and to examine the role of settings outside of primary care in pediatric weight management., (Copyright © 2020 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adolescents and young adults are frequent users of alcohol. Younger patients may be more sensitive to the effects of alcohol than their adult counterparts, and toxicity has been known to occur at lower doses. Respiratory depression is a serious adverse effect of alcohol intoxication; however, current monitoring practices may not adequately detect respiratory depression., Objective: Our objective was to determine the frequency of hypoventilation as measured by capnography among adolescents with acute alcohol intoxication. Our secondary objective was to determine if an association exists between alcohol levels and incidence of hypoventilation., Methods: This was a prospective observational pilot study of patients 14-20 years of age with acute alcohol intoxication. Blood or breath alcohol measurements were obtained on arrival. Hourly measurements of vital signs including capnography were recorded., Results: Sixty-five subjects were analyzed. Mean alcohol level was 185 mg/dL. Twenty-eight percent of subjects had episodes of hypoventilation. Episodes occurred in similar proportions on arrival and during the first 5 h of measurements. There was no difference in alcohol levels between subjects who did and did not hypoventilate (185 mg/dL vs. 186 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval -29 to 25). Oxygen desaturations occurred in 14 subjects and were associated with hypoventilation (p = 0.015)., Conclusions: Hypoventilation is common among adolescents who are acutely intoxicated with alcohol. It is independent of alcohol level and occurs at a steady rate during the first several hours of intoxication. Capnography should be considered as an additional monitoring device to detect these episodes and enhance patient safety., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)