Search

Interest in oyster reef conservation and restoration is growing globally, but particularly in Australia, it is unclear the extent to which oyster reefs complement (versus replicate) habitat provisioning by other structured habitats in the seascape. Remote underwater video surveys of two east Australian estuaries revealed that at high tide, oyster reefs not only supported distinct fish communities to bare sediments but also to adjacent seagrass beds and mangrove forests. Fish observations in oyster reefs were close to double that of mangroves and seagrass, with species richness, abundance, feeding and wandering behaviours similar. Several species of blenny and goby were unique to oyster reefs and oyster-containing mangroves, whilst recreationally fished species such as bream and mullet were more abundant on oyster reefs than in other habitats. Resolving the association between oyster reefs and fish species within the broader seascape will assist in developing restoration and management strategies that maximise fisheries benefit., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

As habitat-forming species continue to decline globally, it is important to understand how associated communities respond to habitat loss and fragmentation. Changes in the density and spatial configuration of habitat have important consequences for associated communities. However, tests of these factors are often confounded by morphological variation of habitat-formers, which can be resolved by using standardised habitat-mimics. Furthermore, few studies have incorporated the role of predators in mediating the observed effects. To test whether predators mediate the abundance of invertebrates among algal habitats of varying configuration (isolated vs patches, and positions within patches), we placed macroalgal mimics into subtidal estuarine habitats for one month to sample epifaunal communities. At the same time, we conducted underwater video surveys of fish communities to quantify fish communities and their feeding behaviour among the artificial habitats. Isolated habitats did not differ from patch habitats, however, patch edges had the highest epifaunal abundance, where fish were least commonly observed. Observed fish feeding was highest in the middle of patches and increased fish observations and feeding in habitats with reduced epifaunal communities suggest that mesopredatory fish are mediating epifauna in patches, with predation pressure altered by the spatial configuration of the habitat. This contrasts to previous studies that focus on predators that congregate outside patches and suggest that fragmentation leads to reduced invertebrate abundance at habitat edges in contrast to centres. However, this study highlights that in habitat patches housing small mesopredators that also benefit from the increased structure, the centre of the patch experiences higher predation and therefore fewer epifauna in contrast to patch edges and individual algal mimics., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Coastal urbanization has led to large-scale transformation of estuaries, with artificial structures now commonplace. Boat moorings are known to reduce seagrass cover, but little is known about their effect on fish communities. We used underwater video to quantify abundance, diversity, composition and feeding behaviour of fish assemblages on two scales: with increasing distance from moorings on fine scales, and among locations where moorings were present or absent. Fish were less abundant in close proximity to boat moorings, and the species composition varied on fine scales, leading to lower predation pressure near moorings. There was no relationship at the location with seagrass. On larger scales, we detected no differences in abundance or community composition among locations where moorings were present or absent. These findings show a clear impact of moorings on fish and highlight the importance of fine-scale assessments over location-scale comparisons in the detection of the effects of artificial structures., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The impacts of novel habitat-forming organisms on associated fauna have been difficult to predict, and may affect the fauna of neighbouring habitats due to changes in the spatial configuration of habitat patches of differing quality. Here, we test whether the localised expansion of a native habitat-forming macroalga, Caulerpa filiformis, on subtidal reefs can affect the abundance of fauna associated with a neighbouring macroalgal habitat. C. filiformis was a functionally distinct habitat for fauna, and the total abundance of epifauna associated with the resident alga, Sargassum linearifolium, was reduced at some sites when in close proximity to or surrounded by C. filiformis. Experimental manipulation of habitat configuration demonstrated that the low abundance of gastropods on S. linearifolium when surrounded by C. filiformis was likely explained by C. filiformis acting as a physical dispersal barrier for mobile fauna. Changes to the spatial configuration of novel and resident habitats can thus affect the abundance of fauna in addition to the direct replacement of habitats by species undergoing range expansions or increasing in abundance., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)