Search

Summary: Background: Sézary syndrome is an extremely rare and fatal cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, has recently been associated with increased progression-free survival in a randomized clinical trial in CTCL. We aimed to evaluate OS and prognostic factors in Sézary syndrome, including treatment with mogamulizumab, in a real-life setting. Methods: Data from patients with Sézary (ISCL/EORTC stage IV) and pre-Sézary (stage IIIB) syndrome diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 were obtained from 24 centers in Europe. Age, disease stage, plasma lactate dehydrogenases levels, blood eosinophilia at diagnosis, large-cell transformation and treatment received were analyzed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazard ratio model. This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials (SURPASSe01 study: NCT05206045). Findings: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients were included (58% men, median age at diagnosis of 70 years, Q1-Q3, 61–79): 33 pre-Sézary (9.7% of 339), 296 Sézary syndrome (87.3%), of whom 10 (2.9%) had large-cell transformation. One hundred and ten patients received mogamulizumab. Median follow-up was 58 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 53–68). OS was 46.5% (95% CI, 40.6%–53.3%) at 5 years. Multivariable analysis showed that age ≥ 80 versus

Background: Surgery is the primary treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). In locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC), surgery may cause functional or aesthetic damage. In laBCC, neoadjuvant administration of vismodegib, an inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, may reduce tumor size, facilitate resection, and reduce functional and aesthetic consequences of surgery. The VISMONEO study assessed efficacy and safety of vismodegib in neoadjuvant treatment of laBCC. Methods: VISMONEO (NCT02667574) is an open-label, noncomparative, multicenter, phase 2 study. Patients with ≥1 histologically confirmed facial BCC, inoperable or operable with functional or major aesthetic sequelae risk, were included. Oral vismodegib 150 mg was administered once daily for 4 to 10 months before planned surgery, which was performed once the best response under vismodegib was observed. Primary endpoint was percentage of patients with BCC with tumor downstaging following surgical resection after neoadjuvant vismodegib. Downstaging was defined according to a 6-stage surgical classification related to the aesthetic and functional consequences of surgery. Findings: 55 patients (median age: 73 years) with laBCC were included from November 2014 to June 2015. At inclusion, 4 patients were inoperable, 15 were operable with a major functional risk, and 36 were operable with a minor functional risk or a major aesthetic risk. Mean size of target lesion was 47.3 mm (SD: 27.2 mm). 44 patients presented with downstaging after vismodegib treatment (80%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67 to 90). Of these 44 patients, 27 had a complete response (25 proved by biopsy). Mean treatment duration was 6.0 months. Overall Response Rate according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was 71% (95% CI, 59 to 88). At 3-years of follow-up, 16/44 patients had known recurrence (36%; 95%CI, 22 to 51). Interpretation: Neoadjuvant vismodegib allows for a downstaging of the surgical procedure for laBCCs in functionally sensitive locations. Funding: VISMONEO was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Background The optimal sequence of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and assessment of response in patients with brain metastases from melanoma remain challenging.Methods We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 patients with melanoma, including 26 patients with BRAF-mutant tumours, with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with ICI alone (n=10, group 1), SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=20, group 2) or ICI plus SRT (n=32, group 3). Response was assessed retrospectively using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) V.1.1, response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) and immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MRI follow-up from 43 patients was available for central review.Results Patients treated with ICI alone showed no objective responses and had worse outcome than patients treated with SRT without or with ICI. RECIST, RANO and iRANO criteria were concordant for complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). RANO called progression earlier than RECIST for clinical deterioration without MRI progression in some patients. Progression was called later when using iRANO criteria because of the need for a confirmatory scan. Pseudoprogression was documented in seven patients: three patients in group 2 and four patients in group 3. Radionecrosis was documented in seven patients: two patients in group 2 and five patients in group 3. Regression of non-irradiated lesions was seen neither in two patients treated with SRT alone nor in five patients treated with SRT plus ICI, providing no evidence for rare abscopal effects.Conclusions Pseudoprogression is uncommon with ICI alone, suggesting that growing lesions in such patients should trigger an intervention. Pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or SRT in combination with ICI. Abscopal effects are rare or do not exist. Response assessment criteria should be considered carefully when designing clinical studies for patients with brain metastases who receive SRT.