Search

Purpose: Universal Pulses (UPs) are excitation pulses that reduce the flip angle inhomogeneity in high field MRI systems without subject-specific optimization, originally developed for parallel transmit (PTX) systems at 7 T. We investigated the potential benefits of UPs for single channel (SC) transmit systems at 3 T, which are widely used for clinical and research imaging, and for which flip angle inhomogeneity can still be problematic., Methods: SC-UPs were designed using a spiral nonselective k-space trajectory for brain imaging at 3 T using transmit field maps (B 1 + ) and off-resonance maps (B 0 ) acquired on two different scanner types: a 'standard' single channel transmit system and a system with a PTX body coil. The effect of training group size was investigated using data (200 subjects) from the standard system. The PTX system was used to compare SC-UPs to PTX-UPs (15 subjects). In two additional subjects, prospective imaging using SC-UP was studied., Results: Average flip angle homogeneity error fell from 9.5 ± 0.5 % for 'default' excitation to 3.0 ± 0.6 % using SC-UPs trained over 50 subjects. Performance of the UPs was found to steadily improve as training group size increased, but stabilized after ~15 subjects. On the PTX-enabled system, SC-UPs again outperformed default excitation in simulations (4.8 ± 0.6 % error versus 10.6 ± 0.8 % respectively) though greater homogenization could be achieved with PTX-UPs (3.9 ± 0.6 %) and personalized pulses (SC-PP 3.6 ± 1.0 %, PTX-PP 2.9 ± 0.6 %). MP-RAGE imaging using SC-UP resulted in greater separation between grey and white matter signal intensities than default excitation., Conclusions: SC-UPs can improve excitation homogeneity in standard 3 T systems without further calibration and could be used instead of a default excitation pulse for nonselective neuroimaging at 3 T., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The use of multiple transmission channels (known as Parallel Transmission, or PTx) provides increased control of the MRI signal formation process. This extra flexibility comes at a cost of uncertainty of the power deposited in the patient under examination: the electric fields produced by each transmitter can interfere in such a way to lead to excessively high heating. Although it is not possible to determine local heating, the global Q matrix (which allows the whole-body Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) to be known for any PTx pulse) can be measured in-situ by monitoring the power incident upon and reflected by each transmit element during transmission. Recent observations have shown that measured global Q matrices can be corrupted by losses between the coil array and location of power measurement. In this work we demonstrate that these losses can be accounted for, allowing accurate global Q matrix measurement independent of the location of the power measurement devices., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Obesity and its co-morbidities, including type II diabetes, insulin resistance and cardiovascular diseases, have become one of the biggest health issues of present times. The impact of obesity goes well beyond the individual and is so far-reaching that, if it continues unabated, it will cause havoc with the economies of most countries. In order to be able to fully understand the relationship between increased adiposity (obesity) and its co-morbidity, it has been necessary to develop proper methodology to accurately and reproducibly determine both body fat content and distribution, including ectopic fat depots. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Spectroscopy (MRS) have recently emerged as the gold-standard for accomplishing this task. Here, we will review the use of different MRI techniques currently being used to determine body fat content and distribution. We also discuss the pros and cons of MRS to determine ectopic fat depots in liver, muscle, pancreas and heart and compare these to emerging MRI techniques currently being put forward to create ectopic fat maps. Finally, we will discuss how MRI/MRS techniques are helping in changing the perception of what is healthy and what is normal and desirable body-fat content and distribution., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)